This is your problem. You believe in the NWO but doesnt know how it works to get it.Cops shoots blacks , whites , green , blues
Who the fukk cares
This is your problem. You believe in the NWO but doesnt know how it works to get it.Cops shoots blacks , whites , green , blues
Who the fukk cares
because the vast majority of rifles have them now, and it restricts access. It also is irrelevant to the safety of individuals. It really is no different than the supreme court overturning the handgun ban.
Assault rifle = select fire weapon capable of automatic fire. Liberals call anything that looks like a military rifle an assault rifle. This bill would change the definition.
assault rifles are already illegal.It is literally blowing my mind why you're defending having an assault rifle.
You haven't listed one legitimate reason other than "it makes less efficient"
Theres no common sense here. Its pandering to those that fear guns, period.
...The measures banning rifles with detachable magazines and requiring background checks for ammo buyers are opposed by the National Rifle Assn., Gun Owners of California and the National Shooting Sports Foundation, the trade association for the firearms industry.
...Two of the bills approved by the Senate would ban the manufacture and sale of semiautomatic rifles with detachable magazines as well as semiautomatic, center-fire rifles with bullet buttons, a recessed button that, when pressed by a sharp object, allows removal of the magazine
Click to expand...
Where's the common sense here? Look at the stats. The vast majority of gun crimes are committed with hand guns. What possible safety can the public get from banning detachable mags? Straight up fear mongering, man. A removable clip is a difference of maybe 10-20 seconds in changing the clip vs reloading the rifle chamber.
Those already possessing such guns would have to register them with the state as assault rifles.
...Another measure approved Thursday would ban the possession of large-capacity magazines, those holding more than 10 bullets. Sen. Loni Hancock (D-Berkeley) told her colleagues that large-capacity magazines were found at the scene of the San Bernardino shooting.
Click to expand...
10 round clip limits do next to nothing. It takes 5 seconds to drop your mag and pop in a new one.
...Yet another bill approved Thursday, authored by De León [Senate President Pro Tem Kevin De León (D-Los Angeles)], would require those buying ammunition to present identification, which would be used by the seller to check to make sure the buyer is not a felon or otherwise prohibited from possessing guns.
Click to expand...
This is the one and only 'common sense' law thats being proposed. You need an ID to buy a gun so I don't have a problem with showing that same ID to buy the ammo for that gun.
And the answer to "Why do you even need an assault rifle?" is simply because I like them. You can drive a Camry to work or an Audi R8. Both provide the same utility and get me from point A to point B but the R8 will be a more powerful and enjoyable ride. Same premise for guns.
assault rifles are already illegal.
people just think these guns
are scarier than this
even though they both shoot the same caliber of bullet. It's all cosmetic
Sadly the public doesnt ask the same for police who have killed more people per year with guns. Plus restricing them from a large population bc a few bad apples proves that the percentage is extremely low. If 38 million people are in cali and lets say 10 million have guns, the bad apples barely even touch a percentage range is not even on the radar. We all know its not about the mass shootings though...except for you.It's not that I don't want you to not have guns....I've been to the shooting range before....it's awesome....It's just the few rotten apples have spoiled it and people are losing their lives.
And unlike most developed countries we haven't done anything about it.
This bill isnt about autos. Autos are already bannedlook, I'm not going to act like I know a ton about guns....but anything you can the press the trigger on and have it fire multiple bullets should be illegal... at least in civilian hands.
This bill isnt about autos. Autos are already banned
To be able to fight an oppresive governmentwhat's your justification for having large capacity magazines?
To be able to fight an oppresive government
How do you justify cops having these weapons?what's your justification for having large capacity magazines?
Give up your rights and handicap the population because you have an irrational fear, brehs.