Ya Sinning Mane
Superstar
This question aint even right. i cant choose man.
they bout equal.
its not clear cut to me.idk
Good one OP
they bout equal.
its not clear cut to me.idk
Good one OP
Hakeem has more 40 pt games in one season than Duncan has in his career![]()

TD is in both top 10 all time in both blocks and rebounds, matter of fact he's the only PF that's top 10 in both categories
Duncan played in an era with no big men yet KG, Dirk, CWebb, Amare, Yao, Rasheed/Ben Wallace didnt exist
Hakeem had 5 straight first round playoff exits yet he's the dominant one
It's a gang of muthafukkas with more 40 point games than Duncan. I guess Dominique Wilkins was more dominant than TD now
![]()
Spurs won 20 games the year before Tim got there
His 2 best teammates in his career were drafted 29th and 57th in their respective drafts
I dont think the Spurs picked higher than 28th in the draft his whole career
How does that sound like a perfect situation![]()

Duncan had to go against prime diesel shaq and saw plenty of mutumbo also. Along with all the other great power forwards of his era.

"
its not even close. 
That is the point, he didn't dominate them where as Hakeem didDuncan dominated in an era that included prime shaq, Webber, kg, and dirk
That is the point, he didn't dominate them where as Hakeem did
he burnt them nikkas alive shyt was ugly but Duncan has had matchups vs dirk, shaq and kg where he was just as dominantLebron stans: Duncan
Kobe fans: Hakeem
Smart people: Hakeem
Its all about legacy agendas in basketball now. All opinions are extremely biased now.

I mentioned the 40pt example to illustrate Duncan was not an elite scorer. No possible way you can even be considered if you only scored over 40pt 9 times in your whole career. Ppl claiming that they are similar on the offensive end but Hakeem was a much better scorer thus him having more high scoring games in one season than Duncan in is WHOLE CAREER(also Hakeem is higher on the scoring list than Duncan even with the injuries that kept him out long periods of time). Hell Duncan isn't even the best scoring big man on the Spurs, David Robinson got that tittle. So offensively, Hakeem is just better.Being dominant is more than just scoring 40 a game, Ben Wallace and russel were dominant and they weren't great scorers
Duncan averaged 25 15 5 and 5 in the 03 finals one of the most dominant finals series of all time
He didn't dominate yet he had a 4 year stretch with 2 titles, made 1st team each season, 2 Finals MVP's, back to back MVP's, and a All Star MVPThat is the point, he didn't dominate them where as Hakeem did

I mentioned the 40pt example to illustrate Duncan was not an elite scorer. No possible way you can even be considered if you only scored over 40pt 9 times in your whole career. Ppl claiming that they are similar on the offensive end but Hakeem was a much better scorer thus him having more high scoring games in one season than Duncan in is WHOLE CAREER(also Hakeem is higher on the scoring list than Duncan even with the injuries that kept him out long periods of time). Hell Duncan isn't even the best scoring big man on the Spurs, David Robinson got that tittle. So offensively, Hakeem is just better.
Defensively, Hakeem is number 1 in blocks, has 2 Defensive POY, and 8th all time in steals. Duncan has more 1st team all defense but that is at the PF spot not center plus there wasn't any defensive big men other than KG and Wallace (Camby even got 1st team in that era).
Hakeem lead the league in Rebounds twice with Barkley and Rodman in the league. Hakeem is one of 4 players in NBA history to record a quadruple double and he done it TWICE.
I understand if you want to say 5>2 but I seen those 2 titles and those 2 titles were 2 of the top greatest runs by any player in the NBA. I'm not going to ignore the fact that Duncan always had an allstar and/or HOF on his team while Hakeem never even played with an Allstar Guard (Drexler wasn't an allstar by the time he went to Houston)