Has AI impacted you in a Good Way?

ChatGPT-5

Superstar
Joined
May 17, 2013
Messages
18,401
Reputation
3,058
Daps
58,020
the operations in QC occur in superposition. then you collapse that into a single value per qbit (range). how would QC solve matrix multiplication if you cannot access the values without collapsing the state?

certain optimisation problems work because they map to indicative probabilities like I said. hill climbing for example.
quantum systems can assist in optimization: they're not brute-forcing matrix math, they're sculpting probability landscapes to make good answers more likely to collapse into.
 

Micky Mikey

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Sep 27, 2013
Messages
16,858
Reputation
3,416
Daps
95,844
In some personal ways, yes. Overall I think AI has done very little to improve the material conditions of most people so far. The return on AI hasn't been worth the amount of money and energy dumped into it imo. Its been dissappointing and this is coming from someone who was gung ho on AI a year ago. Long term I'm sure it'll have some societal impact. For now its mainly hype and a bubble waiting to explode.
 

null

...
Joined
Nov 12, 2014
Messages
31,764
Reputation
5,615
Daps
49,605
Reppin
UK, DE, GY, DMV
Can you give some info where I can learn more about that?

watch one red one blue video series



install IBM's QC developer kit


you will see then how limited the interface (analagous to chip set) and the enter and exit operation to any (as far as i know) quantum calculation.

i.e. hadamard, (QC ops), then collapse to get result.

It can't solve the traveling salesman problem? :lupe:

you'd have to map the paths into numbers and define operations on those numbers to examine all possibilities.

this is an optimisation problem with a single answer (minimum) so i'd say yes.
 

null

...
Joined
Nov 12, 2014
Messages
31,764
Reputation
5,615
Daps
49,605
Reppin
UK, DE, GY, DMV
quantum systems can assist in optimization: they're not brute-forcing matrix math, they're sculpting probability landscapes to make good answers more likely to collapse into.

and if you want the right (enough) answer you have to run multiple times, let probs do their work and even then work to some confidence interval.

meanwhile i think they can do non-QC operations but with no speed up.
 

cyndaquil

Lv 100 Bold natured
Joined
Sep 2, 2014
Messages
9,640
Reputation
3,729
Daps
35,577
Reppin
JOHTO REGION
watch one red one blue video series



install IBM's QC developer kit


you will see then how limited the interface (analagous to chip set) and the enter and exit operation to any (as far as i know) quantum calculation.

i.e. hadamard, (QC ops), then collapse to get result.



you'd have to map the paths into numbers and define operations on those numbers to examine all possibilities.

this is an optimisation problem with a single answer (minimum) so i'd say yes.

Aight time for me to stop with the idiot disguise and go learn something. Thanks breh :salute:
 

O.T.I.S.

Veteran
Joined
Sep 15, 2013
Messages
78,925
Reputation
17,116
Daps
304,875
Reppin
The Truth
In some personal ways, yes. Overall I think AI has done very little to improve the material conditions of most people so far. The return on AI hasn't been worth the amount of money and energy dumped into it imo. Its been dissappointing and this is coming from someone who was gung ho on AI a year ago. Long term I'm sure it'll have some societal impact. For now its mainly hype and a bubble waiting to explode.
Thank you breh

This is how I feel… I could be wrong, but as of now, OTC-AI is just shyt I hear ordinary people talk about with “creating content”, organizing notes, etc…


Thats basically what it does really. Supposed to be a tool/assistant. I use it to data-mine for shyt into a condensed area and for its quick understanding/explanation, but it in no way makes me an expert on that subject or gives me the entire field of view to replace anyone yet. It gives you an overall and could be a great tool for studying (which was going to be my next personal experiment with it).

But other than that, the hype around it reminds me of VR hype but magnified. People are using it to cut corners, not be efficient. As these technologies develop together though, it will be interesting especially around the 2028-2030 area, but now it really isn’t what people think it is. It is inevitable though.
 

cyndaquil

Lv 100 Bold natured
Joined
Sep 2, 2014
Messages
9,640
Reputation
3,729
Daps
35,577
Reppin
JOHTO REGION
But other than that, the hype around it reminds me of VR hype but magnified. People are using it to cut corners, not be efficient. As these technologies develop together though, it will be interesting especially around the 2028-2030 area, but now it really isn’t what people think it is.
Got a quest 3 and I was disappointed because the resolution was not there yet. Even with real captured footage. It needs another 10 years of refinements honestly. Plus the files are huge!
 
Top