Could it be that people are actually charged for hate crimes in California, at least compared to somewhere like Mississippi? I can imagine hate crimes being written off as "self defense" or "suicide" more often in the South.
Hate Crime Maps Reveal the Most Prejudiced Places in America
- Thread starter Busted_Toes
- Start date
Majestyx
Duck Season
that could be a factor, but these SoCal people are full of shyt and racist. For the record i've lived in every part of this country except the middle (idaho, montana, dakotas, etc..)
Naw
You are right, my beef is with the label. For example hate crime stats dont let me know what race the victims are. Anyone (including white people) can be victims of a hate crime. Plus again, if a place is high in violent crime, why does it matter whether the violent crime is "random" or "hate"? Either way I'm not moving my family there and if it's a choice between random violence and "hate crimes" I'll just stay put.
All the hate crime moniker does is make white people feel like victims of PCism and minorities feel like victims of racism.
Fentress County is white as hell thoughThe nikkas in Fentress County, TN vs the cacs in Slope County, ND
This list is
it's about percentage, thoughFentress County is white as hell though
This list is
if 1 out of the 2 black people living there committed a hate crime against whites, it would still put it at the top of the list
An area can be almost crime free by national standard and still be high on hare crime (reported or unreported)
Tell me you want it to be more specific about who hurt who but dont tell me the whole thing is BS. If you want more specifics then say it.
I too would love more specifics.
If im black i dont wanna move in an area thats mostly white and have had hate crimes against blacks.
Wanna get more specific?
Well If i'm Puerto Rican im not gonna wanna move in a neighborhood with a lot of (say) hondurans if they have a history of beef in that area between the two groups. Or if i'm haitian and im in FL in the early to mid 90's i dont wanna move in an all black-american neighborhood seeing the way they used to jump haitians (black like them) back then.
Say what you want ans that you want more detailed data. Dont just call the whole report or concept of hate crime "BS"
Last edited:
ehhhh we needed the hate crime designation though.
It was more of a political tool than a legal consistency type of thing.
It was like a special clause used to REALLY curb certain activities.
You gotta be careful with this argument.
If a white guy robbing a white guy isn't a hate crime, why is a white guy robbing a black guy a hate crime?
And crime is crime.... if someone is looking at two areas, they aren't going to think 'well this area has the same amount of violent/property crime, but at least it isnt HATE crime'
Either all crime is hate crime, or no crime is hate crime. I.e. if any robbery is classified as a hate crime, it shouldn't matter who the victims/perps are, all robberies are then hate crimes, or vice versa. How can u assault/murder somebody you don't hate
One more than one occasion i've seen folks try to shift this to shyt like affirmative action
Just be prepared
you dont need the data. ask the witnesses.
Point me to an example of such a crime, with all this data about who is walking around that should have been a victim instead but wasnt
If i'm a cop
cop: "so witness, what did you see?
witness:"uhh i saw a white male run up on three black people"
cop:"why did you just say run up on 3 black people? why are you emphasizing their race?"
witness" because it looked as if thats all they were targetting"
cop:"how so?"
witness: "well for one, i'm white and there were a few white people walking around that they could've robbed but they only chose to rob black people. it wasnt just women, it was black people, didnt matter the age, sex, etc."
cop:" ok, i'll put that in the file"
cop talks to his over head manager and so forth and they tell him to classify that as a robbery. and they will see about reclassifying it later. later never comes and thats the end of that. cop never knows what happened. and thats a good cop doing his job. we know we got all kinds of shady cops(especially in L.A.)
So if its going down in L.A. what you think is going down in the middle of texas? use your common sense.
They have to under report in places where a lot of minorities share the state with a lot of whites to keep tensions down and keep that stigma away.
now i would go out on a limb and say if there was a black county lets say 90% black.. ran by black people. and if the few white folks were being harrassed by black folks. a lot of black folks wouldnt admit it. because it would make their all black city look bad. It takes a special stand up group of leaders to do the right thing in those situations. we already know white folks be lying a lot when it comes to stats. especially when they are trying to "protect their image"
so looking at who normally puts out the data and knowing who's usually in charge in higher positions and knowing their track record. i can use deductive reasoning and say the books were cooked to some degree. up or down, depending on certain criteria.
remember the phrase. 'men lie... women lie..but numbers dont'
actually thats not necessarily true. or what that phrase implies is that as long as their are stats proving a person's point then its fact what has been shown in the stats.
well thats now how statistics work. you do realize if men and women lie ^^See above... and if men and women are the ones putting these numbers together. the numbers themselves could be off ... you do realize this right?
i agree, the entire report isnt bogus because it doesnt say everything YOU or I want to see/hear.
if you want that info. go to the census. it has it. or the FBI stats. it has it too. broken down by race. i posted it in here a long time ago.
Fillerguy
Veteran
nikkas live in North Dakota
At a certain point one of them must've said "Why do I live in North Dakota
"
At a certain point one of them must've said "Why do I live in North Dakota
"
