
How in the fukk did you draw THAT conclusion to all of that? If you had read any of my other statements in this thread, you would've seen exactly why I consider Obama to be Bill's illegitimate son, who is failing at being an overachiever.
Take things out of context then look stupid with the ad homonems brehs...

. The short of that, if you bothered to read, was Obama gave up trying to be his own man within the first year or two of his presidency, and brought in the full Clinton team pretty much.
Clinton had a lot of successes, for his time after Bush. He was still able to raise taxes and improve the economy. He had his own terror crisis without have in to blow up the Middle East, and the little shot he did got a movie made from it. Wag the Dog anyone. The Clinton's corrupt banker ties played them in the end, as well as his callous American White liberal disregard for the ACTUAL problems of African Americans and crime.
It's hard to blame him for that, as we were kissing his ass too. We still criticized him because, and only because, he was White. If Obama had done half the shyt as Bill Clinton, when be had even more acrimony in Congress (impeachment is not joke and he still didn't act like the lame duck Obama did starting last year), Obama would have likely been the GOAT president.
Obama's a p*ssy, and doesn't live up to "dad". Now, don't get this twisted and feel I'm putting Bill on some kind of pedestal. That's why you really need to read other posts before calling people trolls and shyt. Many people here know how I feel about both the Clinton's and Obama, so it's kinda weird that you're over here trying to rain ether like this is the Coliseum, just because you disagreed. It's HL for a reason.
Both presidents were fukk ups, but i can say that Bill tried harder and left us with a Senate majority in the end. I don't think Obama would be able to say the same how this shyt is turning out.