Hillary Clinton says Republicans are grooming Tulsi Gabbard for a 3rd party run (edit: not Russians)

[AnonymityX1000]

Wtf are you you talking about with this MSM smear bullshyt? A reporter asked her a simple fair and reasonable question that she refuses to answer. She refused to condemn Russian hacking...repeatedly. You don’t have to think Russiagate is this biggest scandal in modern memory to simply say you don’t think Russia hacking is a good thing. You sound just like a Trumptard.

So for the record, your position is even though Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election by hacking the DNC, tried to hack voting machines, the current administration has had its former National Security Director, campaign manager, 2 campaign aides, his personal lawyer along with 20 something Russians pled guilty, the President himself committed obstruction of justice 10 times in order to stop an inquiry into Russian interference, the whole IC says they’re going to interfere again in 2020, and Putin himself said they will again your position is it’s totally ok for a candidate for President to not “give a shyt” and just be cool with an authoritarian foreign government trying to interfere in American presidential elections and tacitly supporting her own presidential campaign?



Tulcels, ladies and gentlemen.

And what's the point of saying that? To appease people who won't believe it anyway? She disavowed David Duke and his endorsements and people still mention his support like it means something. She said she doesn't support Assad and said he is a brutal dictator and she still gets called an apologist for him.
What did she say? She said she has no control over Russia and who they support online, which is true. Disavowing does 0 to stop that and the MSM will ignore she did it anyway.
Tulsi curreenly has a bill on the floor to go to paper ballots which would be unhackable. So she does care about election meddling just not in your preferred way. She wants to do something about it not just say, "I disavow it." Which will not change Russia's support and the media will say it is still fishy anyway.

 

[Dusty Bake Activate]

Having an opinion that another country agrees with doesn't make you an asset of that country. That is the most assinine kindergarten level reasoning .

I don't like burning down rainforest in Brazil. The current American and Brazilian admistrations really don't care. However, the current administrations of Germany, France and EU threatened sanctions against Brazil.

Am I as an American, a European Union asset, just because my personal belief is in line with those governments?

She's explained her position on Syria and its not contingent on Russia's opinion. We created 12 million refugees and displaced people in Syria, destroyed their infrastructure, aided "moderates" that beheaded civilians and launched chem attacks, and spent billions of taxpaying dollars doing it. That's her position.

Is 12 million people without a home a good thing? Is that a Russian taking point? Do you see how dumb that sounds?

Yall should read this, seriously: Syrian War For Dummies - Three Versions

Spoiler

P.S. Here are some links to read if you would like to gain a Ph.D. version of the Syrian conflict:

• a. 1956: CIA plot to overthrow the Syrian government
• b. 1983: CIA document on plans to obliterate Syria to enable an oil pipeline
• c. 1986: CIA document on how to use Muslim Brotherhood to fuel a sectarian (Sunni v. Shiite) civil war in Syria
• d. 2001: Wesley Clark told that USA will take out 7 countries in 5 years (Libya, Syria etc.)
• e. 2005: CNN Interview. Christiane Amanpour tells Assad that the western governments are plotting a regime change in Syria
• f. 2006: State Dept cable: Detailed discussion of various strategies to enable regime change in Syria
• g. 2009: State Dept Email: Saudi Arabia is worried that a Shiite crescent is turning into a full moon (referring to a possible Iran-Iraq-Syria-Lebanon coalition)
• h. 2009: State Dept Cable: Saudi Arabia is the #1 source of funding of terrorism worldwide
• i. 2012 State Dept Email: Conquest of Syria means a weakened Iran and this is important for Israel
• j. 2012: State Dept Email: Use Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey to arm/train rebels
• k. 2014: Hillary Clinton admits in an email that Saudi Arabia and Qatar fund ISIS
• l. 2015: Joe Biden says Saudi Arabia and Qatar arming/funding Al Qaeda in Syria
• m. 2016: John Kerry in a leaked audio recording explains how the US trained/armed the opposition and was hoping to use ISIS to force Assad into negotiation
• n. Israel's Mossad chief admits helping Al Qaeda and says that it's because Al Qaeda never attacks Israel

Strawman. Nobody said another country agreeing with your positions means anything.

But if that country is an adversarial power that is actively trying to influence your nation’s elections in order to advance their geopolitical positions through cyber crimes and propaganda and you are tacitly accepting that country’s help while always playing an apologist role for them and condoning their efforts...and you hired a Kremlin-backed lobbyist to your campaign then yeah, you looking mighty funny in the light.

 

[FAH1223]

 

[AnonymityX1000]

Strawman. Nobody said another country agreeing with your positions means anything.

But if that country is an adversarial power that is actively trying to influence your nation’s elections in order to advance their geopolitical positions through cyber crimes and propaganda and you are tacitly accepting that country’s help while always playing an apologist role for them and condoning their efforts...and you hired a Kremlin-backed lobbyist to your campaign then yeah, you looking mighty funny in the light.

Never happened, stop lying.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

 

[AnonymityX1000]

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

 

[stro]

Old folk always used to say when you're name is not mentioned and you get offended, it means something. The ugly people know who they are, don't they? Also, if the shoe fits wear it. Just saying. There are at least four other candidates she could be referring to but only one spoke up. Tulsi being vague about Russia shyt does not give me a lot of confidence. I like her general stance on wars but she looks shaky here. Only blind Trump like sycophants don't see this. The ad hominem on Clinton rubs me wrong because it's a common tactic used by the guilty. shyt, Trump's whole career is founded in it.

It was obvious who Hillary was talking about because "Tulsi is a Russian asset" has been a talking point going around for months in certain circles, enough to get sporadic coverage on the cable networks. There was no one else that had come up about, especially not any of the other women. Tulsi probably didn't need to respond, at least not as aggressively as she did, but it wasn't like her responding was some guilt revealing trap. This has been a talking point certain actors in the DNC have been spitting out about Tulsi most of this year. It's actually something Tulsi herself has spoken out against on TV multiple times already.

 

[88m3]

The Hill
17 mins ·
JUST IN: President Trump lashed out at former rival Hillary Clinton for suggesting Rep. Tulsi Gabbard is Russia's choice and being groomed as a third-party candidate.

“She’s accusing everyone of being a Russian agent. These people are sick," Trump said.


About this website

THEHILL.COM

Trump defends Gabbard from Clinton's attacks: 'These people are sick'
“These people are sick. There’s something wrong with them,” Trump told reporters.

 

[88m3]

It was obvious who Hillary was talking about because "Tulsi is a Russian asset" has been a talking point going around for months in certain circles, enough to get sporadic coverage on the cable networks. There was no one else that had come up about, especially not any of the other women. Tulsi probably didn't need to respond, at least not as aggressively as she did, but it wasn't like her responding was some guilt revealing trap. This has been a talking point certain actors in the DNC have been spitting out about Tulsi most of this year. It's actually something Tulsi herself has spoken out against on TV multiple times already.

It's been a topic for years and has everything to do with Tulsi's actions and statements. This has nothing to do with the DNC or the "media" you sound like some rightwing shill.

 

[ill]

You cheer on the US while they bomb innocent civilians




This is beyond comical. The only people pushing Tulsi into the spotlight right now are the same people crying about Russia. No one gave a flying fukk about Tulsi before Hillary opened her mouth. She had no power in the party. She had no chance at any nomination. She had no publicity.

She isn't running 3rd party....and if she did she would be stealing votes from Trump. Not Warren/Bernie.

One minute Russian intel is a bunch of geniuses and the next they're peddling some low level politician with no pull?

Russia won multiple times over but right now they're winning because the mere mention of "Russia" and everyone loses their minds.

The only Russian asset is Hillary Clinton.

 

[AnonymityX1000]

It's been a topic for years and has everything to do with Tulsi's actions and statements. This has nothing to do with the DNC or the "media" you sound like some rightwing shill.

How many years? Please link us to info about Tulsi being a Russian asset from even last year?

 

[Pressure]

Us pulls out.
Violence intensifies.
Civilians getting clapped.

Coli nationalist: I'm glad!

 

[88m3]

How many years? Please link us to info about Tulsi being a Russian asset from even last year?

As long as I can remember. If you cared you would try to find them. I'm sure they've been posted in this thread and other threads about her and her background.

 

[AnonymityX1000]

As long as I can remember. If you cared you would try to find them. I'm sure they've been posted in this thread and other threads about her and her background.

If it was true you would try to find them to.