HIV Among Black Women 5 Times Higher Than Previously Thought

Anothergirl

Goat ™
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
8,856
Reputation
-383
Daps
9,309
Cause they use religion to justify that behavior:facepalm:. Some people believe that they are there just to have kids and struggle. Kinda bum shyt is that:comeon: ?

Too many people in the black community center their activities and actions on getting sex and nothing else.

Amen!!!!!
 

Luke Cage

Coffee Lover
Supporter
Joined
Jul 18, 2012
Messages
53,541
Reputation
19,940
Daps
274,443
Reppin
Harlem
As the health community geared up to recognize National Women and Girls HIV Awareness Day today, startling new research revealed that the disease is five times more prevalent among African-American women than previously thought.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that 1 in 32 African-American women will be diagnosed with HIV in their lifetime. But a national team of AIDS experts at Johns Hopkins and elsewhere say they are surprised and dismayed by the results of a new study they conducted, showing that the yearly number of new cases of HIV infection among black women is five times previous estimates from the CDC.


The team, called the HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN), announced results from its HPTN 064 Women's HIV Seroincidence Study (ISIS) this week, which found that among 2,099 women ages 18 to 44, 88 percent of whom were black, 1.5 percent (32 women) tested positive at the outset of the study, even though they all thought they were negative. Among those who initially tested negative for HIV, the rate of new infections was 0.24 percent within a year after joining the study.


Researchers say that women constitute roughly one-quarter of new HIV infections in the US with 66 percent of these infections occurring among black women, although black women constitute only 14 percent of the US female population. What's more alarming is that the rate revealed in the ISIS study is comparable to estimated HIV incidence rates in several countries in sub-Saharan Africa, including the Congo (0.28%) and Kenya (0.53%).


"While African American women do not engage in more risky behaviors than other women, a complex range of social and environmental factors place them at greater risk for HIV," the CDC said in a statement announcing the launch of a new campaign called "Take Charge. Take the Test." aimed at curbing the HIV crisis among black women.


According to a report by News One:
Some of the factors increasing the HIV/AIDS risk for Black women include lack of access to health care and the inability to sometimes negotiate safer sex because of financial dependence on a sexual partner. In addition, because Black men have higher rates of incarceration, which can lead to concurrent relationships and the higher prevalence of AIDS in the Black community, the chances of infection are higher with each sexual encounter.


Data from the ISIS study comes from analysis of at-risk women in these six urban areas in the northeastern and southeastern United States, which researchers say are hardest hit by the global AIDS epidemic.

HIV Among Black Women 5 Times Higher Than Previously Thought: Study




:stopitslime:

That article is from Huffington Post. :comeon:
Thats the same organization thats been accused of supporting pseudo-science. Their reputation in news is that of an organization the you ignore when discussing issues related to medicine and health because they don't care about scientific integrity when it comes to finding their sources.

Thats the reason why they're saying aids is 5 times higher in black women than previously thought, whereas other more prestigious new organizations like the washington post have reported the aids cases are declining.

my advice would be to throw any huffington post articles in the bushes
 

Onpoint12

Banned
Joined
Oct 24, 2012
Messages
177
Reputation
0
Daps
105
Reppin
NULL
That article is from Huffington Post. :comeon:
Thats the same organization thats been accused of supporting pseudo-science. Their reputation in news is that of an organization the you ignore when discussing issues related to medicine and health because they don't care about scientific integrity when it comes to finding their sources.

Thats the reason why they're saying aids is 5 times higher in black women than previously thought, whereas other more prestigious new organizations like the washington post have reported the aids cases are declining.

my advice would be to through any huffington post articles in the bushes

a couple different sites covered this
 

Marvel

Psalm 149:5-9
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
8,804
Reputation
812
Daps
15,176
Reppin
House of Yasharahla
i think the genetic resistance that people of euro decent seem to have to HIV was intentional obviously during it's creation and i think the "cure" is probably in limited circulation in "research and developement" kinds of testing. not something most of us will ever know about much less have access to...

*takes off tin foil hat*

My theory is that rich whites have been purchasing anti-HIV drugs for years and use them as a cocktail to prevent infection. They go on sex tour and smash random women around the world all the time. There was an article that came out a few months ago about a research in which high risk gay and bi men were given the drug and it cut down HIV infection considerably. Like rich white people they have not been using it already :comeon:

This article doesn't make me look at black women any differently. I still go :noah: anytime I see a beautiful black woman. There is now an over the counter HIV test available at drug stores. THIS IS HUGE! We need stop making assumptions about someone's status and at least use such products with your S/O.
 

Anothergirl

Goat ™
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
8,856
Reputation
-383
Daps
9,309
My theory is that rich whites have been purchasing anti-HIV drugs for years and use them as a cocktail to prevent infection. They go on sex tour and smash random women around the world all the time. There was an article that came out a few months ago about a research in which high risk gay and bi men were given the drug and it cut down HIV infection considerably. Like they have not been using it already :comeon:

:leon: now that is something i've never thought about. but it makes total sense. that's exactly what i'm talking about i believe the 1% has access to treatments we don't. i remember reading an article about the H1N1 swine flu vaccine and basically it was you can't trust drug companies and government obviously because they'll inject the masses with stuff to either "test" on us or stuff that hasn't been tested enough to be sure about possible life threatening side effects.

they ended the article by saying something along the lines of... "and if you think the president(bush at the time i think?) and his family are getting the same H1N1 vaccine as the rest of us you better think again".
again it makes total sense that the elite are getting different (re: better and safer) treatments than the rest of us "undesireables".
 

Sad Bunny

they/them
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
76,452
Reputation
3,071
Daps
170,189
Lemme explain where my interest in the subject came from...

Years ago in my slumming phase, I was fukking with this breezy for about 5 months. I had just taken a fall and was crawling mayne. My car was in the bushes and I barely had a roof.

Met this broad who felt the kid any way and I began crushing. Crushed for bout 5 months and we were pretty close. Now women have this thing they do when they feeling good with a man and have plans. They go to the gyno and get tested.

Well this broad came to me one day with tears and told me her doctor told her she was HIV +. :rip: :rip:Shorty was smart cause she had locked my gun up where I couldn't get it. Well madness insued for a while until I calmed down and informed her "I guess we getting married".

Keep in mind that we had been fukkin like 5 months, and I'm a nasty ass nikka....:smugdraper: I fukks everything!!!

Fast forwarding and skipping most cause this is getting long...I got tested and been tested every year since. I'm negative like a mofo :ahh:!!! I lost contact wit breezy after we split but I saw her like a year ago and she still fine than a mufukka, not sick looking or nothing.

:huhldup:

were u shook? scared?

howd it end?

we need more details :mjpls::merchant::scusthov:
 

Gravity

Banned
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
18,816
Reputation
2,185
Daps
56,250
:snoop: there is no "skyrocketing rate" read the quote again
When you compare their rates to other races of women, they are. Unless you just don't believe the stats.
All the evidence points to the disease being spread between gay/bi men, then introduced to heterosexual women from those men.


You have no evidence/statistics to prove otherwise:manny:
If you don't think that there is evidence showing that women do pass the disease to men then you're just somebody who lives in his own world. Being delusional is a personal problem. I wonder how many other dummies out here caught it thinking like you think.

The numbers and REAL life aren't showing this however.

If we believed their numbers, we would be seeing many, many more brothers walking around like :to:.
Well that's a worldwide statistic. I actually don't know if that stat is true for the US alone. That's besides my point though, my point here is that HIV is spread through hetero vaginal intercourse and it's ignorant to think that these women are all getting it from "down low" black dudes. That's a scapegoat, that's just something to deflect away from the real problem which is personal responsibility.

I used to believe this, then I stepped back and looked. nikkas ain't gettin that shyt from puccy.

***I'm sorry Magic Johnson and others of influence but the truth needs be spread***

If a nikka got that shyt he got it from having his ass penetrated....
Like I said earlier, being delusional is a personal problem. I'm done debating with idiots that actually believe that men can't catch it from women.
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
72,589
Reputation
4,199
Daps
114,770
Reppin
Tha Land
When you compare their rates to other races of women, they are. Unless you just don't believe the stats.
Their rates are higher than other women, but overall the rates are declining for EVERYONE outside the gay community. Their rates are not "Skyrocketing"

If you don't think that there is evidence showing that women do pass the disease to men then you're just somebody who lives in his own world. Being delusional is a personal problem. I wonder how many other dummies out here caught it thinking like you think.

I never said men couldn't catch the disease from heterosexual sex, I said it is very improbable and not the primary way the disease is spread to men. If it was up to heterosexual sex alone the decease wouldn't be nearly as widespread as it is.

Like I said earlier, being delusional is a personal problem. I'm done debating with idiots that actually believe that men can't catch it from women.

:whoa: if you want to ignore science, biology, and statistics, then go right ahead but don't go calling other people idiots.
 

Gravity

Banned
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
18,816
Reputation
2,185
Daps
56,250
Their rates are higher than other women, but overall the rates are declining for EVERYONE outside the gay community. Their rates are not "Skyrocketing"



I never said men couldn't catch the disease from heterosexual sex, I said it is very improbable and not the primary way the disease is spread to men. If it was up to heterosexual sex alone the decease wouldn't be nearly as widespread as it is.



:whoa: if you want to ignore science, biology, and statistics, then go right ahead but don't go calling other people idiots.
Later for the semantics and word games. 2/3 of all new HIV infections amongst females are black women even though they're only 14% of the female population, but their numbers aren't skyrocketing in comparison to other races of women?

You said that all the evidence points to women catching it from gay dudes. Show me that evidence. I'd love to see proof that most women who have HIV caught it from a down low man. It is not very improbable for a man to catch HIV by having sex with a woman who has it, and you believing that makes you an idiot. It's those kind of dumb misconceptions that perpetuate the epidemic. All you have to do is look at Africa. Do you think that down low African men are responsible for the epidemic over there too? The ratio of men and women infected with HIV is 1-1 worldwide and that means just as many women are infected as men. There simply aren't that many gay/bisexual men out here in the world. There simply arent that many gay men out here having sex with both men and women. If it was improbable for a man to catch it from a woman like you say, then the numbers would be a hell of a lot lower.

I'm not ignoring anything, you are. You're the one talking out of your behind saying things like "it's improbable for a man to catch HIV from a woman" and "all the evidence points to women catching HIV from bisexual men". None of that is backed up by biology, science, or statistics.
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
72,589
Reputation
4,199
Daps
114,770
Reppin
Tha Land
Later for the semantics and word games. 2/3 of all new HIV infections amongst females are black women even though they're only 14% of the female population, but their numbers aren't skyrocketing in comparison to other races of women?
It's not word games. Skyrocketing insinuates increasing when in fact their rates are decreasing.

You said that all the evidence points to women catching it from gay dudes. Show me that evidence. I'd love to see proof that most women who have HIV caught it from a down low man. It is not very improbable for a man to catch HIV by having sex with a woman who has it, and you believing that makes you an idiot. It's those kind of dumb misconceptions that perpetuate the epidemic. All you have to do is look at Africa. Do you think that down low African men are responsible for the epidemic over there too? The ratio of men and women infected with HIV is 1-1 worldwide and that means just as many women are infected as men. There simply aren't that many gay/bisexual men out here in the world. If it was improbable for a man to catch it from a woman like you say, then the numbers would a hell of a lot lower.
:usure:

Researchers say that women constitute roughly one-quarter of new HIV infections in the US
so if we know only 1/4 of new aids cases occur in women, and it is much easier for men to pass it on to women, then where are the men getting it from?

Today, MSM still account for around three-quarters of HIV diagnoses among male adults and adolescents and the rate of HIV diagnoses among MSM is more than 44 times that of other men.
:ohhh:
So if men account for 3/4 of new aids cases. And gay men account for 3/4 of aids cases in men. That means straight men account for about 18% of new aids cases. Add in drug use and men lying about their sexual exploits and the rate goes down even lower.

Like i said it is very improbable for a man to contract aids through heterosexual sex.

The reason rates are so high in underdeveloped nations is due to lack of healthcare, unsanitary conditions, drug use, and the fact that a lot of babies are born with aids. It shouldn't even be called an STD in those nations.

I'm not ignoring anything, you are. You're the one talking out of your behind saying things like "it's improbable for a man to catch HIV from a woman" and "all the evidence points to women catching HIV from bisexual men". None of that is backed up by biology, science, or statistics.

I've provided evidence from a scientific, biological and statistical standpoint, yet you decide to ignore the evidence.
 

Gravity

Banned
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
18,816
Reputation
2,185
Daps
56,250
It's not word games. Skyrocketing insinuates increasing when in fact their rates are decreasing.
Their rates are increasing compared to other races of women. Are you slow?


:usure:

so if we know only 1/4 of new aids cases occur in women, and it is much easier for men to pass it on to women, then where are the men getting it from?
Most men in the US get it from gay sex, and I've never denied that. What I'm saying is that women are passing it on to men whether you and the rest acknowledge that or not.


:ohhh:
So if men account for 3/4 of new aids cases. And gay men account for 3/4 of aids cases in men. That means straight men account for about 18% of new aids cases. Add in drug use and men lying about their sexual exploits and the rate goes down even lower.

Like i said it is very improbable for a man to contract aids through heterosexual sex.
Wow, your math sucks. 1 minus 3/4 is 1/4, where did you get 18% from? Even if straight men who have caught HIV from women only make up 25% of new HIV cases in men, that still proves my point that women do spread it to men. I wonder how many of those 25% are men like you who thought that it was "improbable" for them to catch HIV from a woman. Those positive results were a hell of a wake up call, I'll bet you that.

The reason rates are so high in underdeveloped nations is due to lack of healthcare, unsanitary conditions, drug use, and the fact that a lot of babies are born with aids. It shouldn't even be called an STD in those nations.
So now HIV isn't even an STD in certain nations? You'll say anything. I don't disagree with HIV rates being high in certain countries because of the reasons that you listed, but there are also other reasons. People being ignorant believing in dumb misconceptions like "it's improbable for a woman to pass it to a man" is also a big reason for HIV rates being high.



I've provided evidence from a scientific, biological and statistical standpoint, yet you decide to ignore the evidence.
You haven't provided anything to back up your drivel. The stats that you listed were already provided by the article and I haven't ignored any of those stats. I asked you to show me your evidence that say that most black woman who have HIV caught it from a downlow man, and you failed to do so.
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
72,589
Reputation
4,199
Daps
114,770
Reppin
Tha Land
Their rates are increasing compared to other races of women. Are you slow?
Actually their rates would be decreasing slower, not increasing, in relation to other women. still in no way does that equate to "skyrocketing"


Most men in the US get it from gay sex, and I've never denied that. What I'm saying is that women are passing it on to men whether you and the rest acknowledge that or not.
I've already said it wasn't impossible just not very common.

Wow, your math sucks. 1 minus 3/4 is 1/4, where did you get 18% from?
Men account for 3/4 of ALL aids cases. Straight men account for 1/4 of aids cases IN MEN. 1/4 of 3/4= 18%. 18% of all new aids cases are found in straight men. Please read and understand before you reply, especially since you like to call other people idiots.
Even if straight men who have caught HIV from women only make up 25% of new HIV cases in men, that still proves my point that women do spread it to men. I wonder how many of those 25% are men like you who thought that it was "improbable" for them to catch HIV from a woman. Those positive results were a hell of a wake up call, I'll bet you that.
what donyou mean even if? The stats are there do you, or don't you believe them?

Out of that 25% can't you admit that some of them got it from needles, and some of them are lying about there sexuality?

So out of all the evidence that has been presented we can say that less than 25% of men with aids got it from vaginal sex. Once again all the evidence suggests it is improbable for a man to catch aids through vaginal sex.

So now HIV isn't even an STD in certain nations? You'll say anything. I don't disagree with HIV rates being high in certain countries because of the reasons that you listed, but there are also other reasons. People being ignorant believing in dumb misconceptions like "it's improbable for a woman to pass it to a man" is also a big reason for HIV rates being high.
In poor nations it doesn't matter if they are ignorant or not. They don't have access to healthcare or condoms.



You haven't provided anything to back up your drivel. The stats that you listed were already provided by the article and I haven't ignored any of those stats. I asked you to show me your evidence that say that most black woman who have HIV caught it from a downlow man, and you failed to do so.
They have not done a "where did black woman get HIV from"'study but if you look at all the evidence use some common sense and think logically you will understand.

Scientifically the World Health Orginization says it's not very probable for the disease to be spread from women to men.

Biologically a mans penis is not very receptive to any decease, the urethra Is very small and protected.

Statistically it has been shown that gay man account for most infections by far, and straight men account for the least. We all know that straight men aren't always honest about their sexuality. So the numbers are probably even more skewed toward gay men.

With all this evidence provided to you, you still deny the truth. All while calling other people dummies :mindblown:
 
Top