HL Climate Change Thread: Fare the well old world

acri1

The Chosen 1
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
25,346
Reputation
4,225
Daps
114,255
Reppin
Detroit
Really though.

What's the point of denying this? I don't really get what's advantageous about ignoring what's clearly an important issue. Obviously logic and scientific consensus isn't a factor since people believe what they want to believe. It is some sort of conservative litmus test? Are people really willing to screw over future generations of humans just because they're scared their taxes might increase a little or something? Is it just to be anti-liberal? Do they believe it's irrelevant because Jesus is about to return? Enlighten me.

People who don't believe in climate change, please share your emotional motivations for this, I honestly don't get it.
 

Slystallion

Live to Strive
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
13,106
Reputation
-10,458
Daps
17,425
Were you not around for climate gate which shows scientists screwed with data to get more funds? Also the motivation is to prevent an overreach of control from the government who will infringe on freedoms for things that are no where near concrete proof or evidence. Cafe standards have already increased the prices of all vehicles
 

acri1

The Chosen 1
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
25,346
Reputation
4,225
Daps
114,255
Reppin
Detroit

jadillac

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
56,595
Reputation
9,375
Daps
174,822
Whoaa...I was just about to make this exact same thread, "Why do people want to deny global warming?"

Whats funny is, if ur from the South, talk to any older person and they'll always say stuff like, "back when I was growing up, it wasn't quite this hot in the summer"...."or our winters were alot colder than what they are now" Or they may even say the completel opposite....point being, there's clearly a difference over time.

To what degree is debatable.
 

Gallo

Banned
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
1,982
Reputation
115
Daps
2,106
Reppin
NULL
Were you not around for climate gate which shows scientists screwed with data to get more funds? Also the motivation is to prevent an overreach of control from the government who will infringe on freedoms for things that are no where near concrete proof or evidence. Cafe standards have already increased the prices of all vehicles

Climate gate was proven to be a farce. And conservatives are usually OK with government infringing on freedoms as long as national security is the rationale(Patriot act, homeland security etc.). Climate change is a national security issue. Read what a few generals have written about it.

US Military on climate change.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/a...ges-ahead-with-plans-to-combat-climate-change
 

zerozero

Superstar
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
6,866
Reputation
1,260
Daps
13,498
global warming doesn't exist

voter fraud exists

it's astonishing how they can hold a negative belief on a fact and a positive belief on a non-fact
 

Slystallion

Live to Strive
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
13,106
Reputation
-10,458
Daps
17,425

thats an opinion piece from newsweek...an extremely liberal source that always rags on conservatives.

They already admit it shows scientists in bad light and their credibility has been damaged when the theory itself has been on shaky ground and never solid enough to warrant the increased costs that the government is asking for

your in a losing battle bytch

and to the the idiot who said national security is ok to infringe on our rights? Bullsh*t there are a ton of libertarians against that and its a completely different matter when your making products more expensive for everyday people as opposed to homeland security wanting to listen to habbibi's phone calls...the latter hardly affects anybody the former messes up your choices and wallet

go f*ck yourselves b*tches
 

Slystallion

Live to Strive
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
13,106
Reputation
-10,458
Daps
17,425
global warming doesn't exist

voter fraud exists

it's astonishing how they can hold a negative belief on a fact and a positive belief on a non-fact

shut your feminine apu sounding ass up...i'm coming for all you faq hags and raining hell to a podcast near you

book it!
 

Gallo

Banned
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
1,982
Reputation
115
Daps
2,106
Reppin
NULL
thats an opinion piece from newsweek...an extremely liberal source that always rags on conservatives.

They already admit it shows scientists in bad light and their credibility has been damaged when the theory itself has been on shaky ground and never solid enough to warrant the increased costs that the government is asking for

your in a losing battle bytch

and to the the idiot who said national security is ok to infringe on our rights? Bullsh*t there are a ton of libertarians against that and its a completely different matter when your making products more expensive for everyday people as opposed to homeland security wanting to listen to habbibi's phone calls...the latter hardly affects anybody the former messes up your choices and wallet

go f*ck yourselves b*tches

So the issue is economic infringement to you. Why take the short-term view and not the long-term view? It doesn't concern you that your children and their children will probably have to bear a greater economic burden because of your short-term interests?
 

Slystallion

Live to Strive
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
13,106
Reputation
-10,458
Daps
17,425
So the issue is economic infringement to you. Why take the short-term view and not long-term view? It doesn't concern you that your children and their children will probably have to bear a greater economic burden because of your short-term interests?

there is no proof that those long term claims are going to happen. Nothing concrete has ever been layed out in fact 30 years prior there was talk of an ice age
 

Type Username Here

Not a new member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
16,368
Reputation
2,395
Daps
32,645
Reppin
humans
Top