first of all if it was nature's or god's will for
- humans to eat cooked food
- humans not to die in infancy of cholera
- humans to live in air conditioned buildings with indoor plumbing
- humans to travel as fast as wheeled vehicles
- humans to fly
homo's that use science to have children are selfish
- Thread starter Kuwka_Atcha_Ratcha
- Start date
first of all if it was nature's or god's will for
Mr. Somebody
Friend Of A Friend
Technosorcery is the future to create designer babies because individuals are not proud of their genetic makeup.
This is like saying that if it was in "god's" plan for you to live, you wouldn't have gotten sick or injured...so don't use science to artificially prolong your life.
Goodness, this is silly logic. Even for the coli.
Goodness, this is silly logic. Even for the coli.
TheDragon23
Banned
nikka 90% of the shyt we do wasnt natures intent 
so miss me with that argument
so miss me with that argument
TheDragon23
Banned
Mr. Somebody
Friend Of A Friend
Im not sure about that but im guessing in the future it will be possible. You could do that now if you procreated with a woman who was you know, not your shade.
TheDragon23
Banned
but im too black too naturally create a liteskin person. my kids would be brown skin max if i procreate with a white woman.
Mr. Somebody
Friend Of A Friend
O well. Lets be proud that we have healthy children instead of worrying about what color their skin will be.
TheDragon23
Banned
Mr. Somebody
Friend Of A Friend
You arent mature.
Kuwka_Atcha_Ratcha
Superstar
once again flawed logic,
you're comparing advancements which was created by man, to the laws of nature. the things you have listed do not run parallel of logic for this discussion.
Kuwka_Atcha_Ratcha
Superstar
no sir it is your logic that is flawed. the point being more so than if it was nature's/god's plan, the fact remains the child is being ROBBED of either a father or a mother on purpose for the sole gain of the homo couple.
Kuwka_Atcha_Ratcha
Superstar
the fact remains that the child is being robbed of either a mother or father, so if you wish to ignore that 'argument' you can't ignore the selfish aspect of it.nikka 90% of the shyt we do wasnt natures intent
ok, so these are two people that love each other, that love the child and want to build a loving home together. selfish.
how about the groupie "bedwenches" that punch holes in condoms in order to trap rappers/ballplayers for child support money? no love, deliberate "ROBBING" of a father, deliberately forming loveless single parent household, through (simple) science. ...where's their thread?
Last edited: