I looked up the Singapore healthcare system just out of curiosity because I was unfamiliar with it, and I'm surprised you're advocating for it.
Here is a quick description of it (Yes, I know its wikipedia)
Healthcare in Singapore - Wikipedia
Citizens are taxed to pay for their own healthcare which is then stored in a healthsavings account. This is more government than Ryan's voluntary HSA plan is proposing. Also the government controlling prices is something I'm surprised you support. This seems very statist and in fact falls in line with Singapore's reputation of being much a statist society as a whole.
Quite frankly I agree that ACA was an example of crony capitalism and if given the power to create a healthcare system is not one I would choose. However, obviously I would go more towards a reliance on the state controlling healthcare cost. The bottom line is I don't think that private industry when it comes to public good are able to act in the public's best interest if more money can be made somewhere. Its an amoral, and at worst immoral,system that should be removed from things such as healthcare, education, military, etc. I don't think the invisible hand is infallible.
I would agree with getting rid of IP laws if that means getting rid of patent restrictions on drugs and research. However, again, I would think this would run counter to what you would advocate because the pro-business argument is that patents help motivate private research and discovery because it allows exclusive access to profits and rewards related to whatever discovery or innovation said company creates. As far as removing the FDA, no will never agree with that though I would be open to modifications. I'm not educated enough on the rest to give an honest critique without research first so I won't try to.
However, I think at the most basic level, we are working on totally different realities here. The idea that government is an absolute evil is something I simply don't believe and I don't think we'll ever come to agreement on that basic fact.
It really boils down to what you think is the greatest evil. Is having a society through the act of government set some expectation among its citizens to support other citizens to some degree the most evil thing in the world? You would say this is through the act of violence but at the same time unless you're living in a cabin in the woods and off the grid, I think there should be some responsibility by a citizen to participate, in this case through taxes, since they often use the same services at some point in their lives.