No one has yet to name them because they don’t exist (until someone post the artist)I want to hear the Black artist that people feel is at Bruno Mars's talent level that isn't getting a push that came out at around the same time
No one has yet to name them because they don’t exist (until someone post the artist)I want to hear the Black artist that people feel is at Bruno Mars's talent level that isn't getting a push that came out at around the same time
They don't make similar music. Paak hasn't really delved into that pop realm heavily like Bruno. He certainly has/had the machine to do it but refused to do so. Look at the singles he's dropped solo since signing to Interscope.
I’m not saying he should be as big but he should be bigger than he is.
fukking negged holy shytUnpopular opinion….I actually enjoy Bruno Mars little protégé Anderson Paak’s music maybe even more than his.
People prioritize entertainment over talent now. It’s also a streaming era. Outside of when I started a vinyl collection late last year I hadn’t bought an album in years.
We toss Spotify and Apple that little $15-$30 a month and stream everything.
the paper trail will always lead back to the black community? which kind of paper? money? that’s kind of the point, is it not? this cultural appropriation removes an avenue of wealth generation from black creatives, allowing white people to make money off the cultural products of the group they’re oppressing.So I watched the video, it was way too long imo, and it was mainly just a video essay on cultural appropriation and whether or not a handful of non-black artists should be considered culture vultures.
This has been touched on many times before in the past so we should all know white artists are going to get more fame doing black music. Other than that it doesnt really present any other new information other than a plea for blacks to support more soulful artists before it gets “massively appropriated”.
My whole take on it is, do we really need to? At this stage in music, as long as the history is documented on who created and innovated the sound/genre, I dont think it should matter on who gets the most fame for it. It can be irksome at most, especially on social media dealing with people who arent musically inclined, but the paper trail will always lead back to the black community. You cant really erase that. Rock music has been massively “appropriated” but its undeniable on where it started.
Also, non-black artists have been making our music even when its popular in our communities. Having more black musicians getting “back to the roots” isnt going to stop an Adele, Amy Winehouse or Justin Timberlake. I dont think thats ever going to go away.
I know a lot of people on here are #AtheistGang, but more black people embracing atheism means less black people in church which played a huge part in black music's soul.



the paper trail will always lead back to the black community? which kind of paper? money? that’s kind of the point, is it not? this cultural appropriation removes an avenue of wealth generation from black creatives, allowing white people to make money off the cultural products of the group they’re oppressing.
no thats by design labels are not promoting black artist that make the same kind of music.
rip mtume he goes over how labels stopped signing talented black artists