
Michael Flynn as Security Advisor, John Kelly as Director of Homeland Security and Mad Dog Mattis as Secretary of Defense.
On one hand, people were concerned about his lack of knowledge on foreign policy and internal security issues so their expertise is well needed.
On the other hand, this could point to going against his campaign promises of non-interventionist policy and could indicate a more hawkish approach. There are also concerns about the government being overly militaristic in general.
Where do you stand on these three? I'm not personally a Flynn fan, am indifferent on Kelly and I like Mattis. I think the pros outweigh the cons but can see both sides of the argument.





Get this money and get a specialty in security and intel and cybersecurity and start your own defense contacting firm