How People in Open Relationships Make It Work

[Nymbus]

What breed of man is okay with his gf or even a female he likes fukking other men? every man I’ve ever dated has been like “don’t even stand too close to another man ”

I've seen it first hand ones that are afraid of being single or that depend on their girl for shelter

 

[hayesc0]

An open relationship speaks on your true feelings and commitment to someone. Someone who you truly loved you could never share

I honestly do not agree with that the view is a social construct now if you sneaking behind someones back and doing it that's different.

 

[King Khufu]

What breed of man is okay with his gf or even a female he likes fukking other men? every man I’ve ever dated has been like “don’t even stand too close to another man ”

Thats True.
I cant stand it when a chick takes her eyes off me.

 

[Eddy Gordo]

What breed of man is okay with his gf or even a female he likes fukking other men? every man I’ve ever dated has been like “don’t even stand too close to another man ”

Will Smith and Steph curry are two examples

 

[3:30]

Open relationships are no big deal

make a promise (mean it)not to divulge what you do with other people and you have the potential to go far

 

[JOHN.KOOL]

I honestly do not agree with that the view is a social construct now if you sneaking behind someones back and doing it that's different.

No nikka its not a social construct. Love and emotion are not social constructs

 

[hayesc0]

No nikka its not a social construct. Love and emotion are not social constructs

Not talking about love I'm talking about monogamy. I really don't think most people are wired for it.

 

[JOHN.KOOL]

Not talking about love I'm talking about monogamy. I really don't think most people are wired for it.

The idea of anyone being 'wired' for monogamy or polygamy is foolish and shows a lack of wisdom. Of course your not wired for it, your not wired for anything, you don't have DNA coding for your personal preferences neither are you born with inate knowledge of any of these things, either way it is all learned behaviour, what we pick up from our environment.

The reason why people struggle with monogamy is not because we aren't 'wired' for it, that is a poorly put together excuse, it is simply because of attitudes to matters regarding sex. In times old when Sex and acquiring women was mainly about leaving behind your seed and multiplying those who did procreated with many women just as animals do, sex then we became more and more hyper sexual and we had sex with more and more women just because we could. How do you expect people not to struggle with monogamy in a society that sexualizes everything?

 

[King Khufu]

@JOHN.KOOL I agree,to a point.
It's only a struggle if society demands sex but nobody is having it! That's real the real price of all this disfunction.

 

[hayesc0]

The idea of anyone being 'wired' for monogamy or polygamy is foolish and shows a lack of wisdom. Of course your not wired for it, your not wired for anything, you don't have DNA coding for your personal preferences neither are you born with inate knowledge of any of these things, either way it is all learned behaviour, what we pick up from our environment.

The reason why people struggle with monogamy is not because we aren't 'wired' for it, that is a poorly out together excuse, it is simply because of attitudes to matters regarding sex. In times old when Sex and acquiring women was mainly about leaving behind your seed and multiplying those who did procreated with many women just as animals do, sex then we became more and more hyper sexual and we had sex with more and more women just because we could. How do you expect people not to struggle with monogamy in a society that sexualizes everything?

Lol our bodies are designed to be with more than one person this has been proven. The penis is literally designed to remove another man's sperm from the vagina during sex. Also it has been a lot of research that suggest human behavior and norms are largely connected with your DNA coding but continue with your condescending tone

 

[Vandelay]

My analyst at a previous job was in an open relationship. I used to play softball with some coworkers and his girl would come out on occasion when we would go to the bar afterward. I always thought there was a weird dynamic there. She was unemployed for 8-9 months while my employee took care of everything. She even went to Europe for 3 weeks without him. Come to find out towards the end, my homie ended up getting some side...I thought it was odd him cheating, I thought was weird as well because I knew his girl so it was awkward. He confesses that they were in an open relationship. Even more awkward was, he seemed fukked up because he got some side which was even weirder to me because I thought that's what people did in open relationships. Apparently they were on the edge of breakup and inevitably did break up a few weeks later.

The whole scenario was fukked because I finally pieced it altogether. Whenever we were out at the bar after softball games, she would float around and seemingly have inappropriate conversation and contact with other people at the bar. Even me...I just shrugged it off as me being tipsy. But now I realize it was them being in an open relationship ultimately that my employee was not at all comfortable with but he apparently went along with for whatever reason.

Objectively in my mind, open relationships can't work because 9 times out of 10, most men can't get p*ssy at will. Only if they are exceptionally good looking or famous does this work in men's favor. And anyone non famous is flirting with disaster.

 

[Mike Nasty]

A bunch of people who can't afford to live alone. A woman married to a gay man.

Why would I refer to someone as my primary partner if I didn't even care that the were getting smashed on the side.
All these sound like roommates that have fukked

I think most women would be bitter if they were getting dikked on the side and their "primary partner" didn't care.

 

[JOHN.KOOL]

Lol our bodies are designed to be with more than one person this has been proven. The penis is literally designed to remove another man's sperm from the vagina during sex. Also it has been a lot of research that suggest human behavior and norms are largely connected with your DNA coding but continue with your condescending tone

Proven where? Show where it has been 'proven' that your body is designed to be with more than one person. And also can you explain how a human being, who never designed or crated the body can determine what it has created for, it seems all they can d o is interpret certain things in a way to lead to a conclusion that they would like. For example...

You said that the penis is 'literally designed to remove another mans sperm from the vagina...' As if that proves the body is designed to be with multiple people. But what if that design of the penis is just a fail safe, in the event that it dies meet a vagina that has had multiple dikks it can remove then sperm and leave only its on like its meant to be. You see what I mean, even if the penis is designed that way it doesn't mean the body IS MEANT to be with multiple partners. That is an assumption which is the result of your preexisting bias.

As for your bit about human behaviour the sane thing apples, and I'll also add information or evidence suggesting something isn't proof of anything. And again it is all a slave to individual subjective interpretation.

The question I would then ask is, if for example human norms and behaviour is tied to DNA and coding then at what behaviors does it start or stop at? Is it feasible to believe only some norms and behaviours are coded and some are not? In turn how can we then judge human beings for any action or behaviour that may have been coded in their DNA and as a result they are hopelessly trapped to act out. How can we convict people of any crimes?

In relation to sex as our topic is, how can we shame pedophiles for attraction to kids when it may be coded for them in DNA. Like I have said before most people don't pay attention to where the rabbit hole they go down is leading. When it comes to science and research, studies and research take by scientists are funded by groups and individuals in the form if grants etc. These people who fund scientific research do so, so the scientific literature being produced suits whatever their agenda is, same way people and companies fund political candidates and parties. If you read a scientific paper or quite some research and don't not only read the entire thing carefully for what us actually proven but also spend even more time looking into the places and institutions where the study took place and the ones that funded it as well as the actual people who did the study then you are naive.

 

[JOHN.KOOL]

My analyst at a previous job was in an open relationship. I used to play softball with some coworkers and his girl would come out on occasion when we would go to the bar afterward. I always thought there was a weird dynamic there. She was unemployed for 8-9 months while my employee took care of everything. She even went to Europe for 3 weeks without him. Come to find out towards the end, my homie ended up getting some side...I thought it was odd him cheating, I thought was weird as well because I knew his girl so it was awkward. He confesses that they were in an open relationship. Even more awkward was, he seemed fukked up because he got some side which was even weirder to me because I thought that's what people did in open relationships. Apparently they were on the edge of breakup and inevitably did break up a few weeks later.

The whole scenario was fukked because I finally pieced it altogether. Whenever we were out at the bar after softball games, she would float around and seemingly have inappropriate conversation and contact with other people at the bar. Even me...I just shrugged it off as me being tipsy. But now I realize it was them being in an open relationship ultimately that my employee was not at all comfortable with but he apparently went along with for whatever reason.

Objectively in my mind, open relationships can't work because 9 times out of 10, most men can't get p*ssy at will. Only if they are exceptionally good looking or famous does this work in men's favor. And anyone non famous is flirting with disaster.

One of my boys met a couple, again apparently in an open relationship. Apparently no one minded, the husband even liked to watch his wife get fukked sometimes. He started having sex with the women and it didn't take long for her husband to start sending him text messages begging him to stop sleeping with his wife. Turns out he wasn't so good with it after all but went along with it because that's what she wanted and he didn't want to risk losing her.

 

[Vandelay]

One of my boys met a couple, again apparently in an open relationship. Apparently no one minded, the husband even liked watch to his wife get fukked sometimes. He started having sex with the women and it didn't take long for her husband to start sending him text messages begging him to stop sleeping with his wife. Turns out he wasn't so good with it after all but went along with it because that's what she wanted and he didn't want to risk losing her.

I don't get the appeal of some men liking to watch their wife get dug out. I also don't get men who would be cool with being watched while digging someone else's wife.

Humans are possessive creatures by nature. Only way we loose that possessive nature is when we have an abundance mindset. Most men can't get an abundance of p*ssy at will. So I fail to see how this is entertained unless the person just does not give a fukk about you.