¤¤¤ How Soon Should She Give It Up? ¤¤¤

[iBrowse]

as soon as she's comfortable
but it's not a question of comfort most times
it's the fact that sex is used to extract emotional and financial gain from individuals

the longer you delay fukking the more things are done and said to manipulate and get that nut
sex is a natural appetite
knowing that it's used to exert control over the behavior of the weak

don't play buss it open

*

Fax. Most women (not even talking about thots) will bust it open for a man that she's really feeling...I don't care how extensive their CV is and how respectable they are...they will fukk. They're human not invalids .

 

[Rawtid]

I wish a hoefax was available (for men too just to be fair for women ) so I would know that in waiting and being exclusive I'm not getting some flea bitten bagina.

Bottom line is that men (including myself) loathe the notion of taking someone seriously who can't take themselves seriously..."why I gotta buy the cow when that dusty nikka got the milk for free"

Why I gotta buy the pig when every chick getting the sausage for free?

 

[KinksandCoils]

Why not just answer the question instead of making assumptions?

I don't use how soon a woman has sex with me to determine whether or not she's relationship, fwb, or one stand material.

If that's what you're getting at....

I need more than sex to nourish my
equilibrium. But I do need sex.

My next question was just gonna be is she aware of whatever you are looking for.

 

[010101]

gospel*

 

[Raava]

I love you @Rawtid

 

[Remote]

Realistically, I guess it depends on how often they see each other and how soon they start to feel exclusive.

You could say something like 2 weeks, but what if you've only gone on 2 or 3 dates in those 2 weeks?
Or what if you've hung out together 9 times in 2 weeks?

That's going to weigh in on the comfort you have with a person and the chemistry.

For me there's really no right answer to the question.
Well, I guess I'd say after the 1st date. I wouldn't wife up anybody I slept with on the 1st date.

 

[™BlackPearl The Empress™]

Answer the second part doe

You don't know

 

[Rawtid]

I can agree with this, I actually believe that waiting until marriage is the best method.

People like to claim they don't want to get stuck with something they don't like but ideally if everyone waited until marriage for sex they wouldn't even know what they liked or didn't until they did it with that person. Sex shouldn't be the focal point of a relationship even though it is important.

But that's assuming we talking about relationship and long term goals.


If we not, then I can't see why it matters to either party when a woman "gives it up"

Umm because fukking leads to kids and possibly disease. You can't expose yourself to that with a dude considering you apart of his "roster". shyt casual daters shouldn't even fukk at all, imo. I agree with waiting until marriage as well.

 

[Rawtid]

I love you @Rawtid

I love you too!

 

[KinksandCoils]

A month isn't a long time. Make up your mind.

Sex is not as important to me as it is for most people, so I can wait until the woman is ready.

But waiting over a month might make me start to question myself

 

[BlackManLiveFromLondon]

I've noticed that a lot of guys seem to take issue with a woman making them wait for sex especially when she didn't "make the last guy wait" (not sure how you would even know this).

Women's logic: Waiting it out will weed out men ONLY interested in sex. Waiting will make him think more highly of me.

Men's logic: Making me wait will make me lose interest/ think she is stringing me along.

So what's the deal? When should she be giving it up in order to keep his interest but not come off as "easy"?

If you're a man and you believe this logic then you are a clown. Women make the suckers and simps 'wait'. The real men get it early and then decide whether shes worth more than just 'sex'.

This thread will be full of female posters doing nothing but

/thread

 

[Diondon]

You don't know

That's not nice

 

[Gold]

This concept is silly to me

Its one thing if you are making a man wait because you are uncomfortable with having sex with him yet. Maybe you're emotionally not there yet, or whatever.

But making a man wait for some artificial length of time because of some arbitrary belief that "x amount of time is adequate"... that's nonsensical.


Brehettes act like its impossible to have a great relationship if someone if you've had sex with them early
If you're with an aint shyt nikka who just wants to hit, he's not going to turn into a saint just cuz you didn't let him fukk for 6 months


If i'm with someone and they say to me "i'm not emotionally ready to have sex with you" i have no problem waiting.
But if they hit me with "I never have sex with anyone within the first 3 months, it will ruin the relationship" I immediate lose some level of interest

Don't judge me based on some generic standard you used with those other nikkas

 

[™BlackPearl The Empress™]

That's not nice

It most cases you don't know.

 

[Guile]

Bullshyt. Men lie. Before you fukk. After you fukk. While you fukk. It doesn't matter, they gonna lie regardless. The best way for a woman to see what a nikka is truly about is to refrain for as long as possible. See how long he gonna put up the act. If he talk about leaving, let him.

False, he's just acting that way to get the p*ssy. If you're emotionally invested in him, it's already guaranteed. Men who don't feel like chasing other women will just waste your time and dog you out anyway.

So you're gonna refrain from sex forever if he puts up with it .

Yes. Why is this so hard for woman to grasp? No one wants to be with where some dusty nikka been up for much less effort.