Cavs spent more time drafting players and trading players to support LeBron and not someone who could take over a game if he's a having a bad night.
I WISH more people understood this when they dare criticize professional sports players. The shyt irks me to NO end hearing people talk about a lack of "loyalty". There is NO SUCH THING as loyalty when millions of dollars and a persons best professional decision making are at hand. People talk about Lebron, Boozer, Ray Allen, and the lack of "loyalty blah blah" but go ask Dominique Wilkins, Karl Malone, Patrick Ewing, John Stockton, etc what "loyalty" got them. NO championships. As a player you either put yourself in a position to make the most money or win a championship. In SOME rare cases you can do both. But fukk loyalty, hand shake agreements, and all that crap. At the end of the day whoever wanna cut that highest check for your services is who you go with. PERIOD

I still say if you have to chose between the two: fukk CHAMPIONSHIPS and GET YOUR MONEY. You can have all the championships you wanted. Unless you have the money you are assed out. Plenty of broke winners out there.
See Antoine Walker
See Scottie Pippen
Both went broke (different levels of broke) under different circumstances but still broke.
- Championships wont pay for your mother's hip replacement surgery
- Championships wont put your kids through college
- Championships wont pay for your daughter's wedding
Money will
Looking at former Heat players alone who have done well financiallyas an example: Ask Matt Geiger and Jamal Mashburn if they would trade half of their current net worth for Antoine Walker's championship ring
Valid point but atrocious examples. Walker made more money than Geiger and Mashburn. He just made bad decisions financially. As far as Scottie goes its not like he willingly took less money for a title. He was just born a couple years too early.
Yup. But to be honest, he did built the team perfectly around Bron's strengths (rebounders, spot up shooters). If Booz had stayed, who knows....![]()
Oh I know Kobe quit on the Lakers just like Bron quit on the Cavs. How is it that is could win 60 plus games with the likes of Mo Williams and Shaq but they they weren't enough when it was time for the playoffs? If Bron would have went all out and loss that would have been fine but if you watched that whole series you know he didn't. Like the year before we they lost to Orlando you couldn't say nothing about that man. He averaged like 38 8 and 8 that series and went out balling his off. But in 2010 it was a different case.
Boston had more weapons and was a better defensive team than Orlando. Don't ever mention those teams in the same breath. Playoff series allows defensive teams like Boston to game plan more against one player and they took that the chance that nobody else would step...which is very obvious.Yeah, I don't think they were ultimately as bad as ppl act like they were.
They could've used another star, but at the same time they had a good amount of depth.
Bron had good teammates, but not great like he has in Miami
Yeah, I don't think they were ultimately as bad as ppl act like they were.
They could've used another star, but at the same time they had a good amount of depth.
Bron had good teammates, but not great like he has in Miami

That wasnt the game he quit in though
It was Game 5 and he DID quit in that game.


How do you not see the contradiction here?They weren't superior but they had enough to win and thusly demonstrate superiority.
Your willingness to dimiss a 20, 20, 10 triple double demosntrates that it isn't really about what actually happened but that it's more so about feelings and emotions. I realize you might have wanted/expected Bron to be superhuman and put on some performance straight out of the Mighty Ducks but that doesn't happen in the real world. With the way Rondo and KG were playing Bron would've had to go game 6 of last year every night for them to win. Like I said before his jumper wasn't there yet and the Celtics didn't have to really worry about anyone else hurting them.
I aint dismissing his triple double but I would have much rather seem him going out gunning instead of facilitating. If Bron would have balled like he did the previous year against the Magic than boys would have beat the Celts. And just cuz you have enough to beat a team in what should have been a seven game series does not mean u are superior. I equate superior to dominance and I don't think they were that I just think that series should have went down to the wire if anything. Even in 2008 without players like Mo Shaq Twan he took them to seven games and went out gunning. So I know that the effort and ability to play like I know Bron could have does exist in the real world.
You act is if the other team has nothing to do with it.
I get what you are saying though. That's just a semantic issue.He's not a gunner though. I could see if that was his natural approach but it's not. Beyond that, gunning has not necessarily proven to be a recipe for winning series. Of course the Cavs woulda won if Bron played like he did against ORL the year before, that's why the Celtics did all they could to prevent it.You act is if the other team has nothing to do with it.
I was referencing superior as in "greater than" aka what it means.I get what you are saying though. That's just a semantic issue.
In 2008 the Hawks also took them to 7 and those Cavs were much better on defense which is why they were able to make through an putrid start to the series by Bron. Spin it how you wish but you don't grab 19 fukkin rebounds without putting out some effort. Bron is an all around player at heart and especially when his shot isnt' falling or the defense is all over him he picks up his game in other areas. That series was more so about what the Celtics were doing and what Bron's "Pippens" weren't doing than Bron just deciding not to dominate.






