HUD Secretary Ben Carson to propose tripling rent for some low-income Americans

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
91,145
Reputation
3,781
Daps
162,641
Reppin
Brooklyn
By Tracy Jan April 25 at 12:57 PM
Housing and Urban Development Secretary Ben Carson on Wednesday will propose tripling the amount the poorest households are expected to pay for rent as well as encourage those receiving housing subsidies to work, according to the administration’s legislative proposal obtained by The Washington Post.

The move to overhaul how low-income rental subsidies are calculated would affect more than 4.5 million families relying on federal housing assistance. The proposed legislation would require congressional approval.

Tenants generally pay 30 percent of their adjusted income toward rent or a public housing agency minimum rent — which is capped at $50 a month for the poorest families. The administration’s legislative proposal sets the family monthly rent contribution at 35 percent of gross income or 35 percent of their earnings working 15 hours a week at the federal minimum wage. Under the proposal, the cap for the poorest families would rise to approximately $150 a month, three times higher than the current minimum.

The Trump administration has long signaled through its budget proposals and leaked draft legislation that it seeks to increase the rents that low-income tenants pay to live in federally subsidized housing.




Housing and Urban Development Secretary Ben Carson has mainly kept a low profile at HUD. Here’s some of what he has been up to. (Victoria Walker/The Washington Post)

The White House budget proposal for the 2019 fiscal yearindicated that it would “encourage work and self-sufficiency” across its rental assistance programs. The reforms would require adults who are able to work to “shoulder more of their housing costs and provide an incentive to increase their earnings,” budget documents said.

HUD also seeks to change the deductions that could be considered when determining a tenant’s rent, eliminating deductions for medical and child-care costs.

“When we are in the middle of a housing crisis that’s having the most negative impact on the lowest income people, we shouldn’t even be considering proposals to increase their rent burdens,” said Diane Yentel, president of the National Low Income Housing Coalition.

Carson plans to lay out the administration’s plans in a press call about an hour before a Wednesday afternoon House Financial Services subcommittee hearing on rent restructuring.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ral-housing-subsidies/?utm_term=.900cf0649fe6

Swell job, Ben.

:scust:
 

chico25

All Star
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
2,007
Reputation
421
Daps
5,681
Reppin
NULL
FAKE NEWS

You think people on section 8 pay $50?:russ:You think in public housing people pay $50? Maybe the people who have ABSOLUTELY no income . On Section 8 you pay 30 percent of total income .

You didn't read the article. It mentioned the 30% of monthly adjusted income that most people pay. It stated that Ben Carson wants to eliminate the deductions for medical expenses and child care that is currently taken into account when determining people's rent portion. It also clearly states that the current minimum rent that a housing authority can enact is capped $50. So housing authorities currently have the option of having a minimum rent between $0 and $50. This act would raise the cap to $150 but unless it's made mandatory to adopt that rate some places wouldn't change their minimum rent at all.

Also current regulations allow families to request that the minimum rent be waived due to financial hardship. I don't know if that will change with this act.
 

Colilluminati

TAMRON HALL STAN
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
10,773
Reputation
2,473
Daps
24,192
Reppin
MiddleWest
You didn't read the article. It mentioned the 30% of monthly adjusted income that most people pay. It stated that Ben Carson wants to eliminate the deductions for medical expenses and child care that is currently taken into account when determining people's rent portion. It also clearly states that the current minimum rent that a housing authority can enact is capped $50. So housing authorities currently have the option of having a minimum rent between $0 and $50. This act would raise the cap to $150 but unless it's made mandatory to adopt that rate some places wouldn't change their minimum rent at all.

Also current regulations allow families to request that the minimum rent be waived due to financial hardship. I don't know if that will change with this act.



You pay 30 percent on Section 8.


You think someone who can’t afford rent can afford child care or insurance on they’re own ? :francis:

If you can afford to pay for rent and insurance out of pocket you make too much money for section 8.


Ben Carson is a is wrong here , but let’s not get confused on the basics . :yeshrug:
 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
47,219
Reputation
7,216
Daps
150,142
Reppin
CookoutGang
Ben Carson is a is wrong here , but let’s not get confused on the basics . :yeshrug:
There's so much wrong here I don't know where to begin.

You pay 30 percent on Section 8.
Yes, that is prior to deductions, most of which are taken out ahead. So you pay 30 percent minus your deductions.
You think someone who can’t afford rent can afford child care or insurance on they’re own ? :francis:
The childcare deduction isn't just for day care. In fact, if they cannot afford childcare (most can't) they will receive a deduction because one family member will have to stay at home in lieu of. Going to work because as you said childcare is often too expensive for families on section 8. Especially for young children.

Healthcare deductions aren't just for insurance. Transportation, insurance, medicine, doctor bills, etc all fit. There are also disability related deductions.

If you can afford to pay for rent and insurance out of pocket you make too much money for section 8.

Hence the deductions.
 

chico25

All Star
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
2,007
Reputation
421
Daps
5,681
Reppin
NULL
You pay 30 percent on Section 8.


You think someone who can’t afford rent can afford child care or insurance on they’re own ? :francis:

If you can afford to pay for rent and insurance out of pocket you make too much money for section 8.


Ben Carson is a is wrong here , but let’s not get confused on the basics . :yeshrug:
Spoken like someone with only a cursory knowledge of the section 8 program. Do you know what the income limits are for section 8 in your city? The people on the program can't afford to pay for rent, childcare and health care on their own. That's why they're on a rental assistance program. That's why the law and program regulations currently takes into account the cost of childcare, disability related expenses and medical expenses that some families incur.

Note that I said medical expenses and health care not insurance, because as the poster above mentioned medical deductions are for any covered medical expenses if the family qualifies for the deductions. Some families might be on Medicare or Medicaid that covers some of their medical expenses, their deductions would be for whatever they pay out of pocket.
 

Colilluminati

TAMRON HALL STAN
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
10,773
Reputation
2,473
Daps
24,192
Reppin
MiddleWest
There's so much wrong here I don't know where to begin.


Yes, that is prior to deductions, most of which are taken out ahead. So you pay 30 percent minus your deductions.

The childcare deduction isn't just for day care. In fact, if they cannot afford childcare (most can't) they will receive a deduction because one family member will have to stay at home in lieu of. Going to work because as you said childcare is often too expensive for families on section 8. Especially for young children.

Healthcare deductions aren't just for insurance. Transportation, insurance, medicine, doctor bills, etc all fit. There are also disability related deductions.



Hence the deductions.



You and a handful of other dudes will debate me for no reason at all . I’m not even supporting Ben Carson or republicans I’m just speaking facts. Once again your just rambling about a bunch of nothing .


Majority of public housing/ section 8 reciepients are required to either work or go to school full time .You don’t get a deduction because your not working to watch your kids :russ:


Let me help you understand something .


If you qualify for section 8 then there is a 99% chance you also qualify for food stamps and childcare and insurance . All paid for by the government . Look it up . They all pretty much follow the same income restrictions.

You MIGHT have to pay a co pay towards child care .

These doctor bills and transportation bills and medical bills your talking about aren’t real. Your just telling me what you think is going on .


I can 100% guarantee you will never meet a woman paying for child care and insurance out of pocket and still receive section 8. LEGALLY


People literally take they husband/boyfriend off they’re cases to avoid losing the benefits because by the government standards that’s too much money for the household .


Think about what your telling me .

A single mother struggling to survive is paying child care out of pocket and insurance . :mjlol:


Do you know how much the average daycare charges a week? Do you know what insurance costs out of pocket?
 
Top