@cook you might want to merge my thread with the transcript link into this thread. Just so we have all the NFL lies in one place.
got you. keep posting the lies. nfl looking funny in the light :rings:
@cook you might want to merge my thread with the transcript link into this thread. Just so we have all the NFL lies in one place.
Are we having press conferences for no name ball boys now?
because they're delusional illiterate fukking retards with a man crush...I would think the commissioner stepping in and telling an owner he has to suspend one of his employees would be more than a story about a "no name ball boy"
I don't understand why pats fans keep running with this story about the NFL making the Patriots suspend the guy...that would fit right in with the narrative the patriots are trying to write about the NFL and Goddell and you trying to tell me that Kraft would just conveniently leave that out of all his rants huh...that big bad Roger made him suspend a guy over deflating footballs that the NFL supposedly can't even prove they deflated...:yeah ok:
that's what i'm not sure on, i was listening to that Mason and Ireland show on espn radio and Mason i think threw around that they wanted to make up for their fumbling on the AP, Hardy and Ray Rice stuff last year. But it seems like a real stretch that they'd go in on a qb ( any of them) and a organization for something that previously was just a 25k fine. why not just wait till the next player fukks up and handle that shyt.
I'm a "grade A dumbass" because I don't want to read 450 pages of shyt I probably already heard, and prefer excerpts containing new or interesting information? Wtf? Stop quoting meYou really are a grade A dumbass. Like I said before, only @SubZeroDegrees @portcityplaya or Saints fans should be mad if Brady gets his suspension removed because the Saints got jobbed the same way. But let's revisit what just happen.
The Superbowl MVP suspended for 4 games.
A huge fine
The loss of 2016's first and 4th round picks.
For what? Footballs that were within the range of the Ideal Gas Law with no evidence whatsoever that they were deflated. What a joke.
Basically, Goodell thinks Brady was trying to conceal or downplay that fact that he talked to Jastremski about the tampering allegations. If, under that theory, Brady was trying to hide that fact that he and Jastremski talked about the allegations, Brady would ultimately be trying to hide the fact that were hoping to get their ducks in a row, for illegitimate purposes.
But here’s the thing. Brady ADMITTED on multiple occasions that he talked to Jastremski about the tampering allegations.
At page 79, Brady testified that he texted Jastremski “You good, Johnny boy?” because Jastremski was “obviously nervous [about] the fact that these allegations were coming out that they would fall back on him.”
Later, at page 130, Brady testified while explaining an 11-minute call with Jastresmki on January 19, the day after the AFC title game: “I don’t remember exactly what we discussed. But like I said, there was two things that were happening. One was the allegations which we were facing and the second was getting ready for the Super Bowl, which both of those things have never happened before. [Editor’s note: It wasn’t the first time Brady went to a Super Bowl, but it was the first Super Bowl for the Patriots with Jastremski in that specific job.] So me talking to him about those things were unprecedented, you know, he was the person that I would be communicating with.” (Emphasis added.)
At page 144, Brady further elaborates on the reasons for phone calls with Jastresmki on January 19, 20, and 21: “[T]he initial report was that none of the Colts’ balls were deflated, but the Patriots, all the Patriots’ balls were. So I think trying to figure out what happened was certainly my concern and trying to figure out, you know, what could be — possibly could have happened to those balls.” (Emphasis added.)

What does the Ravens have to do with the Patriots deflating footballs
How did we get "exposed"![]()
“I heard all that, I couldn’t believe it when I heard it,” Harbaugh told Bob Costas. “It’s ridiculous, it never happened, I’ve been, I never made any call, nobody in our organization made any call. As a matter of fact, just to make sure I had all the facts, I called up Chuck Pagano and asked him, ‘Did anybody else in our organization tip you off about deflated footballs?’ and he said, ‘No way.'”
In the days before they played the Patriots in the AFC Championship Game, the Colts were alerted by the Ravens to pay special attention to potential problems with the game balls
Colts equipment manager Sean Sullivan sent an email to G.M. Ryan Grigson before the AFC Championship saying that the Ravens’ special teams coach, Jerry Rosburg, had called Colts head coach Chuck Pagano to warn him of potential problems with game balls.
is nonsense...
Here he is laughably explaining it for youSomeone explain why Brady destroyed his phone if he had nothing to hide?![]()
REISNER: And you say you don't recall precisely when you gave this phone to your assistant for destruction, correct?
BRADY: Yes.
REISNER: But if you were following your practice, you would have done it around the time that you got a new phone, correct?
BRADY: I'm not sure.
REISNER: Well, the letter that you just said accurately describes your practice says you destroy SIM cards when you get a new phone and "to destroy the actual device when he is done with the phone," right?
BRADY: My assistant does that.
REISNER: Right. So if your actual practice was being followed, the phone would have been destroyed, the phone you were using would have been destroyed around the same time you started using another phone, correct?
BRADY: Right.
REISNER: And directing your attention back to the Declaration of Mr. Maryman, NFLPA Exhibit 6.
BRADY: Yeah.
REISNER The date of active use of your new phone, according to paragraph 4 of his declaration, was March 6, 2015, correct?
BRADY: Yes.
REISNER Do you remember anything else that happened on March 6, 2015?
BRADY: No.
REISNER: Was March 6, 2015 the date that you were interviewed by Mr. Wells and his team?
BRADY: Possibly; I don't know. Was it?
REISNER: If I represent to you that March 6, 2015 was the date you were interviewed by Mr. Wells and his team, you have no reason to doubt that, correct?
BRADY: Right, correct.
REISNER: And because your forensic expert didn't have access to the phone that was being used during what I'm calling this gap period, he couldn't review the text messages, the content of the text messages that were sent and received during this gap period, correct?
BRADY: I think we tried to provide him with everything that we possibly could, you know, to that point. If the phone was already taken out of service, then it was --
REISNER: You couldn't provide him with a phone that had been destroyed, correct?
BRADY: Or that I had given to my assistant, whether he destroyed it or not.
REISNER: That you gave to your assistant for the purposes of destruction, correct?
BRADY: Possibly.
REISNER: Was that your purpose? Was that your planwhen you provided the discarded phone to yourassistant, that your assistant would destroy thephone?
BRADY: That was kind of the normal routine.
REISNER: So that was your expectation when you provided that phone to your assistant that the phone would be, in fact, destroyed, correct?
BRADY: Yes.
REISNER: And if you were following your ordinary practice, that would have been around the beginning of the date of active use of the new phone that you were using, correct?
BRADY: Possibly.
REISNER: If you were following the practice described in Mr. Yee's letter, that's what would have occurred, correct?
BRADY: Not sure.
It's a conspiracy brehs !!!The judge that hears the case will not be weighing whether or not Brady was involved in DeflateGate, but rather whether the NFL followed the proper disciplinary system when doling out the suspension. The NFL and its players are governed by a collective bargaining agreement. That CBA states fairly explicitly that the players agree to accept the league’s discipline system in which Goodell hears and rules on player appeals. As mentioned earlier, it also specifies players must cooperate with investigations, which will be tough for Brady to argue after he reportedly destroyed his cell phone rather than turn it over as evidence during the Wells investigation.
