"I believe Goodell railroaded Tom Brady" UPDATE: Transcripts Released - NFL, RAVENS & COLTS EXPOSED

NYC Rebel

...on the otherside of the pond
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
71,877
Reputation
11,600
Daps
242,138
REISNER The date of active use of your new phone, according to paragraph 4 of his declaration, was March 6, 2015, correct?

BRADY: Yes.

REISNER Do you remember anything else that happened on March 6, 2015?

BRADY: No.

REISNER: Was March 6, 2015 the date that you were interviewed by Mr. Wells and his team?

BRADY: Possibly; I don't know. Was it?

:russ:

Lying ass....I'm DYING
 

Tony D'Amato

It's all about the inches
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
65,958
Reputation
-11,630
Daps
155,585
Reppin
Inches
I hate my team had to be the snitches, Brady is a lyin sack of sh1t. Someone had to stop their bullsh1t.


This fukker gonna drop 60 on us :to:
 

Absolut

Superstar
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
15,896
Reputation
700
Daps
56,315
imo this is similar to the case they tried to jam up barry bonds ass in regards to him knowing he was using steroids or not. the convo between the pats equipment guys/brady destroying his phone coincidentally right before he talked to the investigators etc clearly indicates there is smoke there. the problem will be proving he was aware, when they have nothing linking him. bonds roided, but they couldnt prove bonds knowingly did, because once he says he didnt know and theres no evidence proving otherwise that shyt is cut and dry. brady certainly was in tandem with the equipment guys about how he wanted the footballs, but once he says he wasnt aware and they dont have a link, theres zero case left. the draft pick penalties stay, but bradys 4 game suspension isnt going to be upheld
 

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Superstar
Joined
Aug 14, 2012
Messages
6,534
Reputation
135
Daps
15,921
imo this is similar to the case they tried to jam up barry bonds ass in regards to him knowing he was using steroids or not. the convo between the pats equipment guys/brady destroying his phone coincidentally right before he talked to the investigators etc clearly indicates there is smoke there. the problem will be proving he was aware, when they have nothing linking him. bonds roided, but they couldnt prove bonds knowingly did, because once he says he didnt know and theres no evidence proving otherwise that shyt is cut and dry. brady certainly was in tandem with the equipment guys about how he wanted the footballs, but once he says he wasnt aware and they dont have a link, theres zero case left. the draft pick penalties stay, but bradys 4 game suspension isnt going to be upheld

I'm not entirely up on the Barry Bonds case but were there other indivudals involved in the matter that showed some level of acknowledging Bonds was purposely trying to find ways to roid up?

(i.e. text message conversations)
 

The Fukin Prophecy

RIP Champ
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
24,645
Reputation
5,796
Daps
96,563
imo this is similar to the case they tried to jam up barry bonds ass in regards to him knowing he was using steroids or not. the convo between the pats equipment guys/brady destroying his phone coincidentally right before he talked to the investigators etc clearly indicates there is smoke there. the problem will be proving he was aware, when they have nothing linking him. bonds roided, but they couldnt prove bonds knowingly did, because once he says he didnt know and theres no evidence proving otherwise that shyt is cut and dry. brady certainly was in tandem with the equipment guys about how he wanted the footballs, but once he says he wasnt aware and they dont have a link, theres zero case left. the draft pick penalties stay, but bradys 4 game suspension isnt going to be upheld
This is not like Bonds at all bruh...For starters they were trying to get Bonds on purjery charges...Brady isnt being tried for purjery, Goodells ruling is centered around Brady's failure to cooperate which is easily proven...he had his phone destroyed after he was asked to produce documents from it...

All the government had on Bonds is that he purchased "cream" from Conte/Balco for rehabilitation...Its hard to prove Bonds was lying when dude is telling you a physician recommended it and that he trusted that physicians judgement...Trusting that physician doesn't equal guilty of knowingly taking steroids...that just proves Bonds was naive...

In Brady's case we have texts from the ball boys specifically mentioning deflating the balls and Brady...Add that along with the fact Brady destroyed his phone after the investigator asked for specific texts (documents) and you have more than enough to prove "more probable than not" which is what the NFL is claiming...
 

Absolut

Superstar
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
15,896
Reputation
700
Daps
56,315
This is not like Bonds at all bruh...For starters they were trying to get Bonds on purjery charges...Brady isnt being tried for purjery, Goodells ruling is centered around Brady's failure to cooperate which is easily proven...he had his phone destroyed after he was asked to produce documents from it...

All the government had on Bonds is that he purchased "cream" from Conte/Balco for rehabilitation...Its hard to prove Bonds was lying when dude is telling you a physician recommended it and that he trusted that physicians judgement...Trusting that physician doesn't equal guilty of knowingly taking steroids...that just proves Bonds was naive...

In Brady's case we have texts from the ball boys specifically mentioning deflating the balls and Brady...Add that along with the fact Brady destroyed his phone after the investigator asked for specific texts (documents) and you have more than enough to prove "more probable than not" which is what the NFL is claiming...
"Not cooperating" isn't going to hold up in court. They are saying Brady was aware of the situation. He says he isn't. It's exactly the same as the bonds situation. You can't prove it.
 

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Superstar
Joined
Aug 14, 2012
Messages
6,534
Reputation
135
Daps
15,921
"Not cooperating" isn't going to hold up in court. They are saying Brady was aware of the situation. He says he isn't. It's exactly the same as the bonds situation. You can't prove it.

Its conduct detrimental which is the specific charge. While there is no precedent for punishing someone for a scheme to deflate footballs, there has definitely been precedence for conduct detrimental penalties (fines and or suspensions) in the past.
 
  • Dap
Reactions: MGM
Top