triplehate
Superstar
I wonder if the bytch ass haters on the coli are gonna apologize when they finally figure out that Pats fans been right the whole time.
We won't
I wonder if the bytch ass haters on the coli are gonna apologize when they finally figure out that Pats fans been right the whole time.
I am not. But unfortunately for you and your devry university degree @BarNone and @SuperCoolP_Cal are. :patfrancis:I'm guessing you are not an attorney but you're going to have to learn nuance when dealing with disputes of this sort.
But this is important, as it relates to the email sent by Colts GM Ryan Grigson and Colts equipment manager Sean Sullivan. This message was sent to NFL senior VP of football operations David Gardi and director of football operations Mike Kensil.
Kensil forwarded Grigson’s email without comment to James Daniel, Director of Game Operations at he NFL, who in turn forwarded it to other Game Operations personnel who would be at the game as an ‘FYI.’ Kensil also forwarded Grigson’s email to Dean Blandino and Alberto Riveron, both senior members of the NFL Officiating Department, with the message ‘see below.’ Both Riveron and Blandino decided that they would raise the issue with Walt Anderson, who had been assigned as the referee for the game.
At a pre-Super Bowl press conference, Blandino tried to say that nobody from the league was aware of any issues with the footballs prior to the game.
“Then there was an issue that was brought up during the first half,” Blandino said on Jan. 29 in Phoenix. “A football came into question and then the decisions was made to test them at halftime and now.”
When hit with a follow-up question from the New York Post about allegations that the NFL conducted a “sting operation” in order to catch the Patriots red-handed, Blandino again flatly denied any prior knowledge to anything about football inflation levels.
“I don’t know where [the idea of a sting] came from,” Blandino told the Post. “This was a problem that came up in the first half.”
I am not. But unfortunately for you and your devry university degree @BarNone and @SuperCoolP_Cal are. :patfrancis:
Here's an interesting nuance for you
Dean Blandino, NFL’s Officiating VP, Lied About DeflateGate Knowledge « CBS Boston
:safuture:

that's what i'm not sure on, i was listening to that Mason and Ireland show on espn radio and Mason i think threw around that they wanted to make up for their fumbling on the AP, Hardy and Ray Rice stuff last year. But it seems like a real stretch that they'd go in on a qb ( any of them) and a organization for something that previously was just a 25k fine. why not just wait till the next player fukks up and handle that shyt.What incentive would the NFL have to "frame" their Golden boy and face of their league?
Bro, there has not been reaching. The media is saying the stuff I said months ago. I said months ago that no court in the world could convict Brady for anything, and that the case against the Pats was weaker than the case against the Saints which was also bullshyt. You guys are reaching because occam's razor would tell you to believe the science of nobel laureates over some ridiculous scheme. You cannot convict someone of being generally aware of an event that there is no proof of occurring. I said that from day 1. There is a reason the NFL is asking the Judge to seal the documents of this arbitration. You guys hate the Patriots so much and Brady because he's a pretty boy white dude (and you want to see a white dude get railroaded just like black people do) that you're ignoring middle school science and all the facts of the case.I don't know about Barnone, but Supercal is a confirmed idiot.
not true at all. i supported the saints during bountygate cuz it was just as much bullshyt as spygate...but keep going with that narrative :kermitmolly:
did you see the bounties they had on Cam Newton ?And on the 49ersdid you see the bounties they had on Cam Newton ?

that's what i'm not sure on, i was listening to that Mason and Ireland show on espn radio and Mason i think threw around that they wanted to make up for their fumbling on the AP, Hardy and Ray Rice stuff last year. But it seems like a real stretch that they'd go in on a qb ( any of them) and a organization for something that previously was just a 25k fine. why not just wait till the next player fukks up and handle that shyt.
And why does that matter in this context, assuming those are independent reviewers in the first place? I see alot of lay opinions on evidentiary matters, opinions that are way off base. I see criticism of circumstantial evidence (which is actually often more reliable than direct evidence) at the same time i see circumstantial EVIDENCE regarding MOTIVATION
This has gotten really stupid.
Stupidest set of cohosts I've ever seen