People place so much emphasis on athleticism when it comes to basketball now that it warps their perception of actual basketball "skill (e.g., Rudy Gay, Z-Bo)."Basketball is, and will always be, a game of skill that's correlated to size. That's why someone like Samuel Dalmbert is in the league and Rodney Carney isn't. While Wiggins is a great athlete, it doesn't automatically mean he's going to be this transcendent player. When you're talking about elite players, you're talking about them being all world in 2-3 categories. Wiggins is not "elite" in any basketball skill right now comparative to his size.
Obviously, he's 18 and can develop that. But, it's not some guarantee. It's purely hypothetical. And there's so many variables that go into that. How will he react when he gets money? Will he, as Chris Paul said, "relax?" What will his mindset be? What's his temperament? Why does he even play basketball? Certainly, someone like Kobe plays basketball for entirely different reasons than someone like Dwight, and so on. And that's just the psychological stuff. What if he's just as good as he's going to get? We see this all the time. OJ Mayo, anyone?
I do think Wiggins is going to be a good player. But, like John Thompson said, "Anybody can be good, but greatness is hard." There's so much that goes into being truly great at anything, and people underestimate that. I don't think he's going to be Durant or Super Cool Beas at KSU. It will be interesting to see how he does in college where the space probably more restrcited than he's accustomed to. It seems like his pet move is that spin move. I really want to see if he's effective with that.