A newborn in child care would be all of her money plus some so it's probably cheaper to have her stay at home.
I think that’s understand. But we are talking permanent stay at home mom
A newborn in child care would be all of her money plus some so it's probably cheaper to have her stay at home.
Traveling and shopping aren't traditional parts of the deal. Ask the average 80 or 90+ yr old woman that stayed at home how much shopping she did or how many trips she went on.
If we keeping it a buck, men would be far more receptive to actual traditional roles as it is far more beneficial. When women speak on it they usually base it on the santized, rose colored, or frankly make believe version.
What are you getting at?
Women weren’t looking for the basics, life was just simpler. And no, no woman will sign up to be abused but plenty would sign up for being a SAHM, but a lot of men who claim that this is the role women should want 100% don’t want to be the sole provider.

More than you make, so don’t worry about itHow much would a sole provider need to make in a modest city, say ATL?![]()
More than you make, so don’t worry about it
You trying to press the wrong one. I don’t believe in single income households unless one person is making crazy dough. I’m also anti “the anti 50-50” crowd - they don’t make sense.It's a god to honest question.
Give me a number.
How obtainable is that salary?
Are there enough jobs with that salary for a majority of men?

Over 70 percent of married women are in the workforce because they have to workI’ll park here and observe all the posters who talk out both sides of their mouth. Be in one thread talking about a woman’s traditional role and in the next not with the traditional male role![]()

You trying to press the wrong one. I don’t believe in single income households unless one person is making crazy dough. I’m also anti “the anti 50-50” crowd - they don’t make sense.