if I just said god begins when the ability to explain stops, why are you arguing the point with me that god doesn't explain anything?
Because then you'd move the goalposts whenever we discern and discover that god isn't responsible for something.
You can't keep presupposing god, where god is revealed not to be.
saying "god did it" isn't supposed to get you anywhere. THATS the point
Yet you keep doing it...
if the idea of god does not defy or exceed our reasoning, then why would we need it?
I don't know...which is why I don't understand why otherwise intelligent people keep lingering on to an obviously flawed concept. Its asinine.
reasoning is something we do as humans, god is supposed something beyond that.
Nope. I don't follow.
How does god "go beyond" that? What does that even mean? Stop speaking in parables and vague language.
that's why people use "faith" and "belief" in reference to it.
faith is the excuse people have to believe in things they can't explain.
thats a really shytty through process.
that the problem with people who don't believe in god. because god doesn't compute with your reasoning it can't exist.
False. God doesn't compute because all of the things you assert "god" to be is actually explained through other methods.
Everything you used to call "god" is actually NOT "god" so you keep redefining shyt in the hopes that we'll never encroach on where you redraw the boundaries.
The point is that yuo need to PROVE your god isntead of asking your god to be disproven.
again saying that nothing can exist if you can't explain it makes a lot less sense than belief that there is at least one thing that can
Nope.
Its not about intuition or probability. Because we often discover things that challenge our assertions, so to keep relying on this is inherently flawed.
Proof matters.
Without it, you'll wildly speculating without care or caution to actually confirm anything.