I don't know why you're bolding that like I'm dodging it... I do not give a shyt that he exposed what kind of fukkery America is on globally.
Then we have a massive problem because you're ignoring what is easily 75% of the information he revealed.
THE REST OF THE WORLD DOES NOT DESERVE TO KNOW THAT INFORMATION.He didn't even give all the information he could have given out. He didn't give the Russians any secrets so far that we know of, he simply told the rest of the world that America is also spying on them in order to get international outrage... Something totally fukking simple.
That is N O T the mark of innocence.
ITS THAT TOTALLY fukkING SIMPLE.
USA > The rest of the world.
Just like they feel like they're better than the rest of the world.
Get that through your fukking skull.
The ONLY person thats ever come out from such leaks was valerie plame because SHE went public. Most other agents are killed or put on ice. Ask Robert Hanssen how many lives are lost to his fukkery.If there was a single person put at risk by Snowden's international leaks the government would be putting them on every news channel right now making whatever case they can so I don't buy that bullshyt.
You're being fukking retarded at this point.
The USG would NEVER release those names nor would they allow people to go forward because that would corrupt ON GOING OPERATIONS. You don't expose shyt in the middle of an intelligence gathering mission, NOR do you expose your methods!!!
This makes no goddamn sense from you.
I don't give a fukk about foreign dignitaries. If you care so much about "their rights" go move there.I personally wouldn't have released the international leaks but it's literally inconsequential. American citizens are not supposed to "just know" their government is breaking the law and spying on them, but foreign dignitaries and leaders SURE AS HELL SHOULD![]()
1. renounced citizenshipAnd finally as for Al Awlaki... he was a United States citizen protected by the Constitution.
2. tried in-absentia in yemen.
For rolling with suspected terrorists.His son wasn't rolling with him at the time, he was droned on a separate occasion days later.
They had papers on dude. You conveniently ignore this.Al Awlaki was a misguided fellow who hated America and made mean videos but if the government had any evidence to suggest that he was actively committing treason why didn't they at LEAST try him in a FISA court?
Window of opportunity. Plus, you can't just arrest everyone who is an international terrorist. Stop pretending that this was a "hand cuff" situation.Why didn't they present the evidence to a judge and at least got an arrest warrant?
Snowden isn't coordinating, managing funds, and movtivating others to commit mass murder.They could have legally killed him many ways if they had ANY evidence proving their deluded fantasy and it turns out there was none. They just wanted him dead, a U.S. citizen killed on foreign soil without a trial by this government. What's stopping them from droning Snowden?




Man it's people like you who are part of the problem.