I think it would only succeed in the NBA, and I would support it.
This is a very complex question that requires you to take alot of things into account.
The biggest of which are TV contracts which are usually renewed by the decade. If the NFL has a TV contract with CBS, FOX, NBC, ABC (espn), etc, that's not going to change just because of a mass exodus of black athletes.
However the endorsements and the money behind that would follow the player unless their contracts have clauses that say they must be employed by the league (some do, most don't to my knowledge).
But you have to worry about other things like stadiums, travel, city permits, etc etc. Things that can be established over time but not overnight.
As far as cacs watching it... well there would be nothing to watch if it wasn't on TV due to existing contractual agreements. But lets say it was on TV. The biggest result would be a massive... MASSIVE dropoff in how many people watched sports period.
Some cacs would watch it because they enjoy the sport and want to see the best athletes
Some cacs would watch the old leagues out of nostalgia, tradition, coverage, etc
Some cacs would not watch it out of principle and end up not watching anything
However, down the line I think that NFL and NBA would eventually become MLS status at best if no black people played in those leagues.
However i think the MLB would be just fine.
so basically your saying cacs would roadblock shyt at some level..therefore not support it...correct?so basically your saying cacs would roadblock shyt at some level..therefore not support it...correct?

Sounds like your taking the, "Whats the point of nggas taking the figurehead role, when everything is fine and dandy" approach. So its stillthat's a vanity play
cause they'll get on and won't break bread with no broke nikkas
the rich will eat the poor will keep starving
and why would they cut their profits down use some common sense jahahahahaa
*
to u homieI think theyd start out trying to pretend like they're happy with the best RB in the NFL being Danny Woodhead and the best player in the NBA being Kevin Love. But theyd change up quick

Just taking back control of the sports...where they MAJORLY monetize our labor and we carry. Secondly....![]()
werd nikka? our? nah everyone on this site is probably ridiculously out of shape.werd nikka? our? nah everyone on this site is probably ridiculously out of shape.
u know what I meant. Idc if money ever came my way...Im all for empowering the black dollar
. If cacs fukkn up billis off our blood sweat nd tears...Id rather a brotha be doin the sameno i'm taking the it doesn't matter who's making the money or who's in power unless it benefits me approachSounds like your taking the, "Whats the point of nggas taking the figurehead role, when everything is fine and dandy" approach. So its stillto u homie
I dont understand why this isnt discussed more often? At the least...large corporations would still seek out money partnerships nd deals...or would our athletic talents/skills suddenly be "not a huge deal now?
..."They just put a ball in a hoop or a goal"


. That's not to mention that you retain 99% of the DB's in the league so you will have a major dropoff in terms of offensive production while defenses will still be just as talented.To be profitable they do.