You and I define "human" differently
You think of man, as a lowly puppet, befuddled by his own existence, always one step behind, finding peace only in the submission of his imagination and pride.
I think of him as a MAN, definer of his existence, emboldened by his ignorance, submissive only to his will and desire for understanding.
Existentially, I find your position contemptible, not because of its content, but because of it's pretense, its complacency, its willingness to present and accept a masquerade of intellectual slavery as spiritual freedom, to satisfy itself with sleeping in a blanket of dogma because being awake is too noisy with unanswerable questions.