If you're black and atheist, why arent you automatically considered a white supremacist?

Rack4K

Banned
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
4,793
Reputation
1,100
Daps
19,661
Reppin
BK
Whites have only been on top for roughly 500 years. Before that it was the Arabs. East Asians are likely next. Blacks ran the world during the height of Kemet.

In other words, no race is 'superior' innately. Every race gets their run on top.

The Warriors won one finals and the Cavs won the next. Are the Cavs 'superior'? Not necessarily. But they were better in 2016. That can change. Things always do.

And I'm not even atheist.
 

Black Cobain

Donkey Punch? I Donkey Slap!
Joined
Dec 20, 2015
Messages
7,581
Reputation
2,795
Daps
23,106
Reppin
New Afrika
This is more of a philosophical question. Not that atheists are literally on the front line of white supremacy with picket signs. Just a question if again, philosophically they are white supremacists since whites made the most of their existence (even if it was to the detriment of other "races).. Nobody has took an honest stab at this conundrum. All they can do is try to turn it back on what they THINK I believe...
Why can't Blacks try making the most of their existence? Why shouldn't we?
 

Everythingg

King-Over-Kingz
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
9,355
Reputation
-2,254
Daps
17,372
Whites have only been on top for roughly 500 years.

I'd say longer than that because of Rome/Greece but saying "thousands" was besides the point. They want to harp on that because they cant address whats being discussed.

Before that it was the Arabs. East Asians are likely next. Blacks ran the world during the height of Kemet.

How long were Arabs/blacks on top? And can we say they were on top, in the manner that cacs are today, where they got the whole world (economically speaking, not bill and bob down the street...) shook?

In other words, no race is 'superior' innately. Every race gets their run on top.

For how long though?

The Warriors won one finals and the Cavs won the next. Are the Cavs 'superior'? Not necessarily. But they were better in 2016. That can change. Things always do.

And I'm not even atheist.

Well there are refs in the basketball game that sometimes (well most of the time as Im starting to assume that sports are largely fixed) effect outcomes so I think that analogy doesnt fit.

Then again, maybe it does, because whites were given power and authority from another group (bankers today) who I guess we could call the "refs" :manny:
 

Everythingg

King-Over-Kingz
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
9,355
Reputation
-2,254
Daps
17,372
@Everythingg you delusional lol everybody in here telling you don't make any sense/ sound dumb.


But what can you expect from someone who says white people have been ruling for thousands of years :mjlol:

Its pretty sad that this is the height of your ability to have intelligent discussion. All you can do is flame and nitpick instead of addressing the topic of the thread which is OBJECTIVE MORALITY in regards to the atheist... Then again, what else should I expect from you when I've posed the same question three times and you've ducked it everytime to try to flame and nitpick :ehh:
 

Roland Coltrane

Superstar
Joined
Aug 17, 2014
Messages
8,955
Reputation
3,710
Daps
30,226
Reppin
AA GANG
He's a demon breh and this is the side you're on :yeshrug:
first of all, I don't believe in God, demons, angles, cherubs, or any of that shyt. :camby:

second of all, that speech he gave highlighted the the lunacy in believing in an omnipotent, omniscient being knowingly setting humanity up for failure and punishing them for it.

what kinda sadistic shyt is that :heh:
 

Everythingg

King-Over-Kingz
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
9,355
Reputation
-2,254
Daps
17,372
Why can't Blacks try making the most of their existence? Why shouldn't we?

Who said that blacks CANT or shouldnt do anything?

I said that whites were the most successful at prolonging their life while making it easiest as possible. In nature, how is this NOT the goal of an animal?

To an atheist, whats the difference between what binds an animal in nature (nothing as anything goes there) and a human (who since to the atheist is not bound by any laws since there has NEVER been anything/anyone objective to give it)? Im here posting points and brehs just ducking left and right.. Maybe you'll pick up the ball
 

Black Cobain

Donkey Punch? I Donkey Slap!
Joined
Dec 20, 2015
Messages
7,581
Reputation
2,795
Daps
23,106
Reppin
New Afrika
Who said that blacks CANT or shouldnt do anything?

I said that whites were the most successful at prolonging their life while making it easiest as possible. In nature, how is this NOT the goal of an animal?

To an atheist, whats the difference between what binds an animal in nature (nothing as anything goes there) and a human (who since to the atheist is not bound by any laws since there has NEVER been anything/anyone objective to give it)? Im here posting points and brehs just ducking left and right.. Maybe you'll pick up the ball
Just because somebody's not religious doesn't mean they can't have any moral code, rape is reprehensible, incest is reprehensible, murder is reprehensible and it doesn't take a book for almost every person on earth to know this.
 

Lamar Givens

Spitting truth you can’t handle
Supporter
Joined
Nov 20, 2016
Messages
3,351
Reputation
162
Daps
9,959
Reppin
Yeshua
To be black and atheist is the height of profound ignorance.

To claim to want to display black power, intellect, and progress while denying the Most High that created you while embracing a white cac philosophical belief system is the EPITOME of c00nery.

:mjlol:
 

Eddy Gordo

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
4,148
Reputation
615
Daps
13,933
Who said that blacks CANT or shouldnt do anything?

I said that whites were the most successful at prolonging their life while making it easiest as possible. In nature, how is this NOT the goal of an animal?

To an atheist, whats the difference between what binds an animal in nature (nothing as anything goes there) and a human (who since to the atheist is not bound by any laws since there has NEVER been anything/anyone objective to give it)? Im here posting points and brehs just ducking left and right.. Maybe you'll pick up the ball
We told you earlier. There is no objective morality. Their is only subjective morality. And that's usually subject to the over arching morals in society at the time. Good and evil are perspectives. Morality is a perspective. Most atheist I know don't have to say shyt like "I'm good because God told me to be." They either have basic human empathy and don't do fukk shyt because they can empathize with other individuals or they are sociopaths.
 

Lewis Black

Superstar
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
13,536
Reputation
5,116
Daps
53,251
I'd say longer than that because of Rome/Greece but saying "thousands" was besides the point. They want to harp on that because they cant address whats being discussed.



How long were Arabs/blacks on top? And can we say they were on top, in the manner that cacs are today, where they got the whole world (economically speaking, not bill and bob down the street...) shook?



For how long though?


1. Greeks were never an imposing empire.

2. Roman Empire lasted 500 years

3. Asian Chinese empire 2000 years

4. Arab Ottoman Empire 600 years


5. Egyptian black empire 500 years


Like I said you don't know what you talking about lol
 
Top