If you're black and atheist, why arent you automatically considered a white supremacist?

[the cac mamba]

Ok we were talking about the bible though. But I knew you would start deflecting soon enough.

what gives you the right to write off a novel that 1.5 billion people hold as the sacred word of god

the catch is that whatever your answer is applies to my view of your novel

 

[Black Cobain]

Ok we were talking about the bible though. But I knew you would start deflecting soon enough.



Agree with bolded. But christianity has nothing to do with the bible .Its cacs taking the bible, and creating their own religion out of it. Thats why it hasnt helped black people in the slightest. Because its not for them.

The reign of blacks over whites, hasnt been as long as the reign of whites over blacks. Its been thousands of years of whites running things globally. How arent they superior in the mind of the atheist?

Just because atheists don't believe in a deity doesn't mean they fill the void with white supremacy, atheism is the rejection of a higher power.

 

[Everythingg]

So if it's power, if the Chinese become most powerful are we now Asian supremacists? By your logic

Should I pull out a colonialist map? The asians arent in power. Heck whites arent ultimately as my OP says, they were GIVEN their position by another group who is in power. The point is, that those who create a comfortable way of life for themselves and their family, who work less but receive more, in theory, should be "supreme" to those who are under their foot. Nobody has explained why this isnt the case...

again, we don't care about your bible it's not valid.

Thats not what those in power believe since they stole the scriptures from blacks, told blacks the people in the book were cacs like them, said the book was about them and for them (even though it was written BY and TO blacks) then buiilt a nation state based off of the book. Of course you cant explain why they did that either...

So your position thinks it's fine that innocent descendants suffer because a deal is a deal ( which he knew we would break).

Isnt that what life tells you anyways? If a mom was smoking crack while pregnant, doesnt the innocent descendant suffer? The ancestor of blacks agreed to a deal. Obey, live good. Disobey, be at the bottom of the totem pole.

This ultimate finesse is the pearly gate promise with no proof whatever.

No. Its where you're basically forced to go to work everyday just like billions of other people, to make those at the top who do NO WORK of their own trillions of dollars everyday. Oh and besides that money, then they proceed to tax you on your labor. They finessed you breh and are doing so as we speak. Talking of a better (and worse) place after this life, doesnt top that finesse move

I have no idea what you're going on about here..

That you cant even understand things from your point of view (which is why you dont understand what exactly it means when I say that the ancient Israelites were black per the bible and timeline of the bible and that those in power today, took the bible and taught blacks that it wasnt about blacks, but it was about THEM who took the bible from blacks) so how can you turn to God's point of view, to try and understand what He knew and what He didnt know would happen and how that pertains to us... THATS what Im going on about.

Its like a blind man trying to explain what a seeing man sees

 

[Everythingg]

what gives you the right to write off a novel that 1.5 billion people hold as the sacred word of god

The God they say they worship, said He chose blacks (you know my people) to be His people. Therefore, if they arent in line with who their God chose then

the catch is that whatever your answer is applies to my view of your novel

Does it breh?

 

[Lewis Black]

The reign of blacks over whites, hasnt been as long as the reign of whites over blacks. Its been thousands of years of whites running things globally. How arent they superior in the mind of the atheist?

Breh I mean this in the nicest possible way but you have no idea and you are making yourself look like a fool.



Thousands (meaning more than 2) of years lol? What the hell are you talking about my dude.


White people only truly took over Africa 200/300 years ago because of guns, thousands of years lol

 

[ShaneTheRogue]

Ok we were talking about the bible though. But I knew you would start deflecting soon enough.



Agree with bolded. But christianity has nothing to do with the bible .Its cacs taking the bible, and creating their own religion out of it. Thats why it hasnt helped black people in the slightest. Because its not for them.

The reign of blacks over whites, hasnt been as long as the reign of whites over blacks. Its been thousands of years of whites running things globally. How arent they superior in the mind of the atheist?

That's simply not true. It's been a couple of hundred...if that. Also you keep assuming that 1) people who aren't Christian are all atheists 2) Atheists are incapable of having a moral compass. Are you familiar with the "Social contract" philosophy?

Social Contract Theory | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Basically it's the philosophy of why we have laws and follow those laws and should have consequences if we don't. It predates the bible as well as Christianity.

 

[the cac mamba]

The God they say they worship, said He chose blacks (you know my people) to be His people. Therefore, if they arent in line with who their God chose then



Does it breh?

yeah, because you think jesus is god/gods illegitimate son. and they think he was just a measly prophet. and you cant both be right, or the importance you place in your religion is meaningless

 

[Kilgore Trout]

If we look at the world, whites are obviously in a better position than the rest of the races. If you're atheist, and believe there is no life after this, then how do we explain this NOT meaning they are superior than blacks? If theres no life before or after this, then this life is of the upmost importance. So making this life as easy, comfortable, and long as possible is the goal for "natural" goal for the human with no Creator who judges their behavior here. The cac through white supremacy, has acheived this for himself and his own people. Doesnt that make him superior to the rest of the races who suffer under his boot? Of course they had to lie, cheat, and steal their way to supremacy and had help from another "force" which is a whole other story. And of course, they lie and steal the achievements, knowledge, religions etc.. of blacks and superimpose their "cacness" over it. So in NO WAY shape or form am I suggesting that whites are superior. But to an atheist? How do you not consider them to be superior?


An animal would LOVE to have someone else chase their food down, kill it, and the animal in wait waltz in and eat the meat of the hard work the other animal put in. And whites have effectively gotten the world to do this for them (and that other force that helped them). To you black atheists out there, who believe there is NOTHING to judge the vicious crimes they did in the past, no one to judge the theft of land they committed, no one to judge how they turned the oppressed into the problem in the media's eyes, I dont understand how you're not a philosophical white supremacist based on all this. Mind xplainin?

Lay off the weed

 

[Everythingg]

Just because atheists don't believe in a deity doesn't mean they fill the void with white supremacy, atheism is the rejection of a higher power.

This is more of a philosophical question. Not that atheists are literally on the front line of white supremacy with picket signs. Just a question if again, philosophically they are white supremacists since whites made the most of their existence (even if it was to the detriment of other "races).. Nobody has took an honest stab at this conundrum. All they can do is try to turn it back on what they THINK I believe...

 

[Lewis Black]

That's simply not true. It's been a couple of hundred...if that.

That one sentence just kinda deaded the thread, thousands of years lol.

Dude has been wrong about so many things but that is a glaring mistake which shows his lack of knowledge.

Just take the l my dude.

 

[Everythingg]

Breh I mean this in the nicest possible way but you have no idea and you are making yourself look like a fool.



Thousands (meaning more than 2) of years lol? What the hell are you talking about my dude.


White people only truly took over Africa 200/300 years ago because of guns, thousands of years lol

Europe has been colonizing the world since the 15th century breh

Not to mention there was Rome and Greece before that who controlled alot of the "known" (and I use this word loosely) world. Lame ass niccas wanna nitpick instead of having a discussion

 

[Roland Coltrane]

Ah the Humanist right?

 

[Everythingg]

That's simply not true. It's been a couple of hundred...if that. Also you keep assuming that 1) people who aren't Christian are all atheists 2) Atheists are incapable of having a moral compass. Are you familiar with the "Social contract" philosophy?

Social Contract Theory | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Basically it's the philosophy of why we have laws and follow those laws and should have consequences if we don't. It predates the bible as well as Christianity.

Again, Europe start colonizing the world in the 15th century. And thats after Greece and Rome did a number on the world too. Then theres the bankers, who actually run things, that have been there all along. But that is besides the point. The point wasnt: "They've been on the up and up for (insert specific timespan)" just that they have been for much longer than the blacks you or someone else did in the past (I believe they were referring to the Moors)

So where do laws come from to an atheist? If its men like me and the atheist, who determines the "right" and "wrong" laws we utilize? I've asked this time and time again. Can YOU be the first in this thread to answer it?

 

[Everythingg]

That one sentence just kinda deaded the thread, thousands of years lol.

Dude has been wrong about so many things but that is a glaring mistake which shows his lack of knowledge.

Just take the l my dude.

Niccas want to take the easy way out and try to beg me to lose, instead of MAKING me lose

As I said to you the first time, nobody has addressed the nature aspect of my argument. In nature, who tells the lion he is wrong to steal the food the panther who effectively chased down and killed his prey? Who in nature, goes to the lion and says "you were wrong for stealing what the panther worked hard to obtain?" Without the Creator, its nobody. So how is the lion WRONG in what he did? The goal of a lion (to us at least animals understand alot more than those in the know let on) to preserve his and his families lives for as long as possible making it as comfortable as possible..

Same with humans. With no OBJECTIVE morality to explain to humans why they SHOULD behave a certain way, anything goes. Thats how it is in nature right? So without the Creator set order to things, how does this same law of nature NOT apply to humans as well?

YOU need to take the L for nitpicking instead of having the discussion that I posed to you in the first place.. Begging me to take Ls instead of giving one out isnt whats hot in the streets I was raised in breh

 

[Lewis Black]

@Everythingg you delusional lol everybody in here telling you don't make any sense/ sound dumb.


But what can you expect from someone who says white people have been ruling for thousands of years