The initial premise that you build your logic on is incorrect.
Your entire premise seems to equate men and women. To you, men and women are equal when that could be the furthest thing from the truth.
You're saying I'm using semantics to define options but no, I'm not.
I'll put it to you a different way. Women choose men. Women are the gatekeepers.
Why? Because if left to men, we would choose all of yall. Women are the chaste ones, the ones who say no 9 times out of 10.
You seem to think that because you could walk out your front door right now in a skin tight thigh high skirt that shows off your panties if you bend a little, and in a low cut blouse with your breasts hanging out, that because every man you encounter would want to have sex with you, that that means you have "options".
You're looking at it completely wrong. You choose. True enough. You would choose which out of the 100 men that you see that you want, but that's not options.
For the sheer fact that most women aren't seeking sex exclusively. Yall are seeking relationships or long term entanglements while 99 out of those 100 men you see would smash you and dash you.
How many men do you know that TRULY want to be in a relationship with you and aint cappin just to get you out your panties?
THOSE are your options. And I promise you, that number isn't gonna be anywhere close to the number of men that want to have sex with you.
Going back to what I originally said about your initial premise about men and women being equal... its wrong.
Because you're failing to take into account that men and women want very different things.
We call the number of women that want to sex us, our options.
Why? Because that's what we want.
Women would be better off calling the number of men who want relationships with you, your options.
Because that's what yall want.
Some of the most smart dumb nikka shyt I've seen in my life. Incredible.



because it is
