"Im a square,theres nothing wrong with it,we run everything"-Van Lathan to a bedwench

Jazzy B.

Superstar
Joined
Aug 8, 2013
Messages
17,102
Reputation
2,846
Daps
61,928
If So-called squares, stopped giving women into thugs attention, it'll end. Once you put your foot down. I'm not dating a women who knowing got knocked up by so and so street dudes,And have that aura,you really ain't fukking with them they'll notice that and act accordingly.
I'm not a slave to my urges, I meditate and do all that shyt. And carefully pick who Im smashing. If I see that she heavy into certain Grimey dudes I bush her, immediately. Specifically if she has kids, some of these dudes could kill you or make you kill them.
Squares are losing cause they simps.
That's why Russell Wilson, lost.he had options yet choose who he choose,giving her value. Russell's a simp&square. There's thugs too who are simps. Simpletons cut across categories. Difference is thugs escape the simp category because they are more violent , can't keep emotions in check, thus mistaken for masculinity. Squares shouldn't mess with thug chasing girls, regardless of her society status, once you see who she's with or been with , you should treat her accordingly.
Don't mess with them Except for transactional sex if you must.
Other cultures girls hide it, but blks,Latino glorify that shyt. How can you build if the women value , pants sagging?. Some grown ass women at that.

It's ironic isn't it.

Squares complain about the women they want only wanting "thugs".

Yet they never go after nerdish female squares who don't want thugs.

When you ask them why they've got every excuse in the book "not enough attraction", "not in shape" "too homely", "too boring" etc. There's always an excuse.

I saw some chick say the other day that "Black Men wouldn't never go after a Ketanji Brown Jackson because of how she looks" which I thought was bullshyt.

But thinking on it Black squares who have issues with women that want thugs would definitely say no to a Ketanji Brown even though a woman like that would never consider or be interested in a "thug" :manny:
 

GrindtooFilthy

World Class SuperVillain
Supporter
Joined
Feb 22, 2014
Messages
16,260
Reputation
3,118
Daps
43,496
Reppin
MA, CT, NH
Being a square has nothing to do with how much money you make. A square is a man who works and isn’t in the streets.
nikka if that’s the definition then that’s literally the entire population of the nation, so when did the working man or being a proletariat devolve into not being a public menace or domestic terrorist on the street?
 

GrindtooFilthy

World Class SuperVillain
Supporter
Joined
Feb 22, 2014
Messages
16,260
Reputation
3,118
Daps
43,496
Reppin
MA, CT, NH
You're absolutely right breh.

They just don't want to admit it and it's why as a Black man you've got to be dumb as hell to follow this "become high value stuff" (which is for whiteboys) when you live in white society. Because in white society white men are "higher value" than black men by default.

So for a Black man attract women by especially black women he has to assume black women are race loyal by default because if the argument and theory is that "if you become a high value male women will flock to you", then shouldn't Black Women be choosing white men over black men as they of course have higher value and more access to resources and money in a white dominated society compared to Black Men? Doesn't this also mean Black Women who are picking Black Men are wrong as they are choosing lower value men? which is a main divestor talking point.

Once again breh you are absolutely right.

If a black man follows this then he's agreeing with Divestors :manny:
This sounds like Blanqueamiento :patrice:
 

TEH

Veteran
Joined
Jul 24, 2015
Messages
49,781
Reputation
14,834
Daps
203,676
Reppin
....


What does he mean "we" run everything? Black squares dont run America or even anything within the black community.

So if you make that the basis of why a woman should choose a man. You are basically cosigning divestor/wench talking points. If a black woman is going to be with a black man,who is Europeanized,who doesnt relate to most black people. Why wouldnt she go around the square black male,to the white man who actually runs everything in this country? And the pool is larger in terms of men who have wealth,high paying jobs etc.

These Kevin Samuel type dudes are dangerous. Making a black mans value be about money,his career and other European trappings. Black men worship what the European has,then get upset when our women turn to wenches. If you act like you got a crush,why wouldnt your woman#TheChildOfMan, #TwoSidesOftheSameCoin:wow:

You’re delusional

Squares do run things

You think rapper types are in charge anywhere?
:mjlol:


Ask 90% of us on the board with any level of success …
 

Wild self

The Black Man will prosper!
Supporter
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
83,122
Reputation
12,123
Daps
225,370
You see it, it's hi key c00n talk, I don't know why both black men and women put black men in such limited boxes while other races of men can be a range of things :francis:

They want you to be T'Challa with the swag of Future, just to be tolerable to be 'social'.

Crazy, how the most extroverted and social people are by far the most judgmental and short-tempered.
 

Marc Spector

the 4'11 Cuban
Joined
Aug 7, 2014
Messages
13,875
Reputation
3,929
Daps
53,366
Reppin
The Milky Way
You're absolutely right breh.

They just don't want to admit it and it's why as a Black man you've got to be dumb as hell to follow this "become high value stuff" (which is for whiteboys) when you live in white society. Because in white society white men are "higher value" than black men by default.

So for a Black man attract women by especially black women he has to assume black women are race loyal by default because if the argument and theory is that "if you become a high value male women will flock to you", then shouldn't Black Women be choosing white men over black men as they of course have higher value and more access to resources and money in a white dominated society compared to Black Men? Doesn't this also mean Black Women who are picking Black Men are wrong as they are choosing lower value men? which is a main divestor talking point.

Once again breh you are absolutely right.

If a black man follows this then he's agreeing with Divestors



using the NBA as a allegory:

This is like telling a center to not develop a jumpshot because "it further validates guards!! :damn:" or telling teams to not take more 3 pointers because it makes the Warriors look good....

nikka i dont give A fukk who is leading in the league or who started what trends, the goal is to finish better and its RETARDED to tell nikkas "dont even compete, its a cac driven league :birdman:".

If it leads divestors into cac arms, who cares? You think Serge Ibaka wasnt gonna develop a jump shot because "i dont wanna prove my OKC Detractors right :troll:"?

fukk no, he adapted and developed a shot, got paid (albiet by a team that wasnt his first choice ) and then eventually found himself in a situation that led to a ring. Apply this example to the manosphere as needed
 
Last edited:

Kski

All Star
Joined
Nov 25, 2016
Messages
862
Reputation
375
Daps
3,580
Reppin
Cleveland
It's ironic isn't it.

Squares complain about the women they want only wanting "thugs".

Yet they never go after nerdish female squares who don't want thugs.

When you ask them why they've got every excuse in the book "not enough attraction", "not in shape" "too homely", "too boring" etc. There's always an excuse.

I saw some chick say the other day that "Black Men wouldn't never go after a Ketanji Brown Jackson because of how she looks" which I thought was bullshyt.

But thinking on it Black squares who have issues with women that want thugs would definitely say no to a Ketanji Brown even though a woman like that would never consider or be interested in a "thug" :manny:
Vast majority of the time nikkas who complain about Black women wanting thugs are full of shyt. They just tryna justify their pawging :mjpls:

They’ll gladly go after nerdy square white women
 

blockburna420

Consecutive thumbs up
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
21,273
Reputation
6,111
Daps
77,852
Reppin
Detroit
He's right. For all the coli talking about a real nikka, none of the real nikkas apply themselves to get to the point where they can be politicians, judges, etc etc. It's the square intelligent brothas in those positions.

Did this really need a thread?
:patrice: Kwame Kilpatrick and Judge Mathis
 

Jazzy B.

Superstar
Joined
Aug 8, 2013
Messages
17,102
Reputation
2,846
Daps
61,928
using the NBA as a allegory:

This is like telling a center to not develop a jumpshot because "it further validates guards!! :damn:" or telling teams to not take more 3 pointers because it makes the Warriors look good....

nikka i dont give A fukk who is leading in the league or who started what trends, the goal is to finish better and its RETARDED to tell nikkas "dont even compete, its a cac driven league :birdman:".

If it leads divestors into cac arms, who cares? You think Serge Ibaka wasnt gonna develop a jump shot because "i dont wanna prove my OKC Detractors right :troll:"?

fukk no, he adapted and developed a shot, got paid (albiet by a team that wasnt his first choice ) and then eventually found himself in a situation that led to a ring. Apply this example to the manosphere as needed

What are you talking about?

Nobody is saying black men shouldn't better themselves.

The issue is when you equate "high value" to things such as wealth, ownership, resources and state that is what a high value man is.

So all a black woman has to say is well "white men make more money, own more, have more resources than Black Men so why should I pick them over white men?"

Then what are you going to say?
 

Marc Spector

the 4'11 Cuban
Joined
Aug 7, 2014
Messages
13,875
Reputation
3,929
Daps
53,366
Reppin
The Milky Way
What are you talking about?

Nobody is saying black men shouldn't better themselves.

The issue is when you equate "high value" to things such as wealth, ownership, resources and state that is what a high value man is.

So all a black woman has to say is well "white men make more money, own more, have more resources than Black Men so why should I pick them over white men?"

Then what are you going to say?

Youre missing the point.

The HVM convo is highlighting the fact that there is a pecking order in the world and as a man you should mold yourself around it because it gives you the best chance to succeed in this world (especially with women).

This analagous to the NBA where there is a pecking order of skillsets. The NBA is in the 3 ball era, you have to be a good shooter to be a high value player.

So if Black Women said that "having money and resources and powermatter so we prefer cacs" ....

Then id do exactly what Ibaka did.

Realize this is the way of the world and integrate that into my skillset.

Doesnt mean everyone is going to be tripping over themselves to pay/choose you.

But all it takes is one and once you integrate that skill, its a good chance that whoever chooses you is also of *quality* as well even if they arent your first choice/team (if you know what i mean :mjpls:. This is where the HVM narrative ties into hopping the fence)
 

Marc Spector

the 4'11 Cuban
Joined
Aug 7, 2014
Messages
13,875
Reputation
3,929
Daps
53,366
Reppin
The Milky Way
Vast majority of the time nikkas who complain about Black women wanting thugs are full of shyt. They just tryna justify their pawging :mjpls:

They’ll gladly go after nerdy square white women

Honestly this is a oversimplification. Most brehs ive seen that solely go after non black womem are more successful with non black women :manny: these men would be the same men that BW called square of lame. Nerdy attractive women nearly dont exist.
 
Top