In seconds, AI builds proteins to battle cancer and antibiotic resistance

Richard Glidewell

Yall done tore all the bottom of ya shoes w/me!!!
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
8,970
Reputation
2,483
Daps
25,663
LMAO.......IT WAS INEVITABLY.........TIME TO EMP THEM DATABASES AND SEVERELY LIMIT COMPUTE POWER MOVING FORWARD..........if anything will stop AI it's things like this where people can come up with solutions and work arounds
 

SheWantTheD

Veteran
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
41,148
Reputation
2,520
Daps
102,878
No, AI does not come up with new information or data

It merely returns information or data that already exists.

There’s no artificial intelligence being that’s coming up with its own thoughts, ideas, new information, making breakthroughs in cancer research etc
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
68,653
Reputation
10,572
Daps
185,479
No, AI does not come up with new information or data

It merely returns information or data that already exists.

There’s no artificial intelligence being that’s coming up with its own thoughts, ideas, new information, making breakthroughs in cancer research etc

AlphaProteo generates novel proteins for biology and health research​


Research

Published: 5 September 2024​

Authors: Protein Design and Wet Lab teams​


[SUB]New AI system designs proteins that successfully bind to target molecules, with potential for advancing drug design, disease understanding and more.[/SUB]

Every biological process in the body, from cell growth to immune responses, depends on interactions between molecules called proteins. Like a key to a lock, one protein can bind to another, helping regulate critical cellular processes. Protein structure prediction tools like https://deepmind.google/impact/meet-the-scientists-using-alphafold/"]AlphaFold have already given us tremendous insight into how proteins interact with each other to perform their functions, but these tools cannot create new proteins to directly manipulate those interactions.

Scientists, however, can create novel proteins that successfully bind to target molecules. These binders can help researchers accelerate progress across a broad spectrum of research, including drug development, cell and tissue imaging, disease understanding and diagnosis – even crop resistance to pests. While https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06415-8"]recent machine learning approaches to protein design have made great strides, the process is still laborious and requires extensive experimental testing.

Today, we introduce https://storage.googleapis.com/deep...tein_Design_White_Paper_2024.pdf"]AlphaProteo, our first AI system for designing novel, high-strength protein binders to serve as building blocks for biological and health research. This technology has the potential to accelerate our understanding of biological processes and aid the discovery of new drugs, the development of biosensors and more.

AlphaProteo can generate new protein binders for diverse target proteins, including https://www1.rcsb.org/structure/1BJ1"]VEGF-A, which is associated with cancer and complications from diabetes. This is the first time an AI tool has been able to design a successful protein binder for VEGF-A.

AlphaProteo also achieves higher experimental success rates and 3 to 300 times better binding affinities than the best existing methods on seven target proteins we tested.

Learning the intricate ways proteins bind to each other​


Protein binders that can bind tightly to a target protein are hard to design. Traditional methods are time intensive, requiring multiple rounds of extensive lab work. After the binders are created, they undergo additional experimental rounds to optimize binding affinity so they bind tightly enough to be useful.

Trained on vast amounts of protein data from the https://www.rcsb.org/"]Protein Data Bank (PDB) and more than 100 million predicted structures from AlphaFold, AlphaProteo has learned the myriad ways molecules bind to each other. Given the structure of a target molecule and a set of preferred binding locations on that molecule, AlphaProteo generates a candidate protein that binds to the target at those locations.


https://deepmind.google/api/blob/website/media/GDM-ProteinDesignBlog-02-Binder-Final.mp4


[FIGURE]
[CAPTION]Illustration of a predicted protein binder structure interacting with a target protein. Shown in blue is a predicted protein binder structure generated by AlphaProteo, designed for binding to a target protein. Shown in yellow is the target protein, specifically the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain[/CAPTION]
[/FIGURE]

Demonstrating success on important protein binding targets​


To test AlphaProteo, we designed binders for diverse target proteins, including two viral proteins involved in infection (https://www.rcsb.org/structure/2WH6"]BHRF1 and SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor-binding domain), SC2RBD), and five proteins involved in cancer, inflammation and autoimmune diseases (IL-7Rɑ, PD-L1, TrkA, IL-17A and VEGF-A).

Our system has highly-competitive binding success rates and best-in-class binding strengths. For seven targets, AlphaProteo generated candidate proteins in-silico that bound strongly to their intended proteins when tested experimentally.

For one particular target, the viral protein https://www.rcsb.org/structure/2WH6"]BHRF1, 88% of our candidate molecules bound successfully when tested in the Google DeepMind Wet Lab. Based on the targets tested, AlphaProteo binders also bind 10 times more strongly, on average, than the best existing design methods.

For another target, https://www.rcsb.org/structure/1WWW"]TrkA, our binders are even stronger than the best prior designed binders to this target that have been through multiple rounds of experimental optimization.

[FIGURE]
[CAPTION]A grid of illustrations of predicted structures of seven target proteins for which AlphaProteo generated successful binders. Shown in blue are examples of binders tested in the wet lab; shown in yellow are protein targets; highlighted in dark yellow are intended binding regions.[/CAPTION]
[/FIGURE]

Validating our results​


Beyond in silico validation and testing AlphaProteo in our wet lab, we engaged Peter Cherepanov’s, Katie Bentley’s and David LV Bauer’s research groups from the Francis Crick Institute to validate our protein binders. Across different experiments, they dived deeper into some of our stronger SC2RBD and VEGF-A binders. The research groups confirmed that the binding interactions of these binders were indeed similar to what AlphaProteo had predicted. Additionally, the groups confirmed that the binders have useful biological function. For example, some of our SC2RBD binders were shown to prevent SARS-CoV-2 and some of its variants from infecting cells.

AlphaProteo’s performance indicates that it could drastically reduce the time needed for initial experiments involving protein binders for a broad range of applications. However, we know that our AI system has limitations as it was unable to design successful binders against an eighth target (https://www.rcsb.org/structure/1TNF"]TNFɑ), a protein associated with autoimmune diseases like rheumatoid arthritis.

Achieving strong binding is usually only the first step in designing proteins that might be useful for practical applications; there are many more bioengineering obstacles to overcome in the research and development process.

Towards responsible development of protein design​


Protein design is a fast-evolving technology that holds lots of potential for advancing science in everything from understanding factors causing disease to accelerating diagnostic test development for virus outbreaks, supporting more sustainable manufacturing processes and even cleaning contaminants from environments.

To account for potential risks in biosecurity, building on our long-standing approach to responsibility and safety,https://storage.googleapis.com/deep..."]we’re working with leading external experts to inform our phased approach to sharing this work and feeding into community efforts to develop best practices including NTI’s new AI Bio Forum.

Going forward, we’ll be working with the scientific community to leverage AlphaProteo on impactful biology problems and understand its limitations. We've also been exploring its drug design applications at Isomorphic Labs and are excited about what the future holds.

At the same time, we’re continuing to improve success rates and affinity of AlphaProteo’s algorithms while expanding its range of design problems it can tackle. We're working with researchers in machine learning, structural biology, biochemistry and other disciplines towards developing a responsible comprehensive protein design offering for the community.

Read our whitepaper here​

it's as if you didn't even read the article.
 
Last edited:

Braman

Veteran
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
16,343
Reputation
3,843
Daps
64,993
What are people alluding to when they say this; what's the wrong way to use AI?

This says more about the people saying it and their world view ….or lack thereof

Bc “AI” in the very broad term has BEEN in use across every sector in all walks of life. Nggas just get their news from Shaderoom and jbo so they have a limited/conservative perception of AI use cases. Ie…

The way you think it should be used for now, Captain Obtuse. Obviously

Ngga I know you not talkin

And this wasn’t ChatGPT. I guess it’s an AI specifically for things like this

Oh forreal?!?! :wtf:

what-jaguars.gif
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
68,653
Reputation
10,572
Daps
185,479
If this was real it wouldn’t be published in Nature Communications lmao

now it's not real? :what:

which part isn't real, the ai models, the protein or the results?


Nature Communications is a peer-reviewed, open access, scientific journal published by Nature Portfolio since 2010. It is a multidisciplinary journal that covers the natural sciences, including physics, chemistry, earth sciences, medicine, and biology. The journal has editorial offices in London, Berlin, New York City, and Shanghai.

The founding editor-in-chief was Lesley Anson,[1] followed by Joerg Heber,[2] Magdalena Skipper, and Elisa De Ranieri.[3] As of 2022, the editors are Nathalie Le Bot for health and clinical sciences, Stephane Larochelle for biological sciences, Enda Bergin for chemistry and biotechnology, and Prabhjot Saini for physics and earth sciences.[4] Starting October 2014, the journal only accepted submissions from authors willing to pay an article processing charge. Until the end of 2015, part of the published submissions were only available to subscribers. In January 2016, all content became freely accessible.[5]

Starting from 2017, the journal offers a deposition service to authors for preprints of articles "under consideration" as part of the submission process.[6]
 

O.T.I.S.

Veteran
Joined
Sep 15, 2013
Messages
82,484
Reputation
18,014
Daps
318,543
Reppin
The Truth
This says more about the people saying it and their world view ….or lack thereof

Bc “AI” in the very broad term has BEEN in use across every sector in all walks of life. Nggas just get their news from Shaderoom and jbo so they have a limited/conservative perception of AI use cases. Ie…



Ngga I know you not talkin



Oh forreal?!?! :wtf:

what-jaguars.gif
Yea.. foreal.

I guess you ignored the sentence directly after that?
 

Chrishaune

Veteran
Joined
Jun 28, 2012
Messages
38,860
Reputation
2,677
Daps
94,267
Reppin
Huntsville
No, AI does not come up with new information or data

It merely returns information or data that already exists.

There’s no artificial intelligence being that’s coming up with its own thoughts, ideas, new information, making breakthroughs in cancer research etc

People have forgotten A.I. has to be fed information.

And that information can be biased, and more than likely will be biased.

We'll wait to see what the side effects of these new A.I. drugs are.
 

Curioser

All Star
Bushed
Joined
Jul 10, 2012
Messages
2,240
Reputation
-410
Daps
3,432
Reppin
NULL
Uh it took seconds but how many seconds have passed since then and we don’t have a cure for MRSA. …. Always overhyping….
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
68,653
Reputation
10,572
Daps
185,479
Uh it took seconds but how many seconds have passed since then and we don’t have a cure for MRSA. …. Always overhyping….

you can contact them about that...

Key Contacts:

NameAffiliation(s)Role
Dr. Rhys GrinterMonash Biomedicine Discovery InstituteCo-lead, AI Protein Design Program
A/Prof. Gavin KnottUniversity of Melbourne Bio21 Institute; MonashCo-lead, AI Protein Design Program

seems like there was some promising research back in 2023.


 
Top