heisenburrr
Have Fun Staying Poor
ya'll can't be serious.
globalization, the advent of new technologies and television in second/third world countries makes it a no brainer that Jordan in his prime was more popular than Mike Tyson on the simple fact his image was carried way further in places and households that Tyson in his prime could have never reached.
The true test of popularity IMO is to evaluate the impact or recognition of an athlete in place were either one's respective sports had no appeal or no following at all, places that are way out there. Based on that, there is no way someone can argue that Tyson had that reach.
There's no point in arguing that boxing is more global than basketball. The fact is Michael Jordan, the Chicago Bulls & Nike IN THEIR PRIME were way more GLOBAL than Tyson.
so nobody tryna debate this point heh ?