Indian warns westerners that India is a “veritable hellhole,” most Indians are incompatible immigrants

[GoPinheiro]

Listened a little bit and it basically matches what I said in the other thread about Dinesh D'Souza...Most of these people just repeat the same compressed narratives from westerners and never challenge anything. Most of these "based" non-whites are only seen as based due to their ability to mimic western simplification of history.

For instance, the dude praises Western systems that the British left and said that Indians later corrupted everything. However, he never mentions that these systems were basically segregationist systems that marginalized the majority. He never mentions that "Indians" were never a unified identity. Never mentions that the British weaponized those ethnic groups that were more open to support and prioritize post-colonial trade with Britain.
India was a land comprised of many different nation-states and each with different laws, norms, cultures etc. Forcing all of them into 1 new identity, with foreign systems of government, means that you will have more dominant ethnic groups controlling most resources and marginalizing the rest. It means that voting is more about ethnic representation than policies that will benefit the majority. With some people being intentionally less productive because the state itself means close to zero them, on some "My language and culture are never represented, why should I contribute anything to this state?" or "My participation into this state also means my erasure because I have to assimilate to the most dominant groups and historically we have little in common.".
The lack of trust he described didn't just come out of nowhere. The lack of trust stems from the perception that the state prioritizes control over genuine representation. Like, when diverse groups are forced into a single national identity, the less powerful groups start viewing the government as an enforcer of assimilation rather than a protector of unique rights and cultures for each group.

"Western wealth hypnotizes them."
I mean, we are talking about 2-3 generations raised as heavy consumers of western media. And western media has been extremely obsessed with the wealthy. Even Japan, homogeneous place, that wasn't colonized by the west, also had an era(80s to early 90s) of people just obsessed with consuming western goods. Why? Western media consumption. That's when their media decided to fight back and started to focus mostly on promoting their minimalist way of life.

"The 1980s are often characterized as the height of rampant consumerism and excessive materialism, as a time when Japan embraced its financial and material affluence."

Living the Good Life? Waste and Wastefulness in Japan of the 1980s | Department of History

Your RSVP is appreciated.

history.stanford.edu

Most countries in Africa and Americas are also facing similar issues. Europeans also struggled with the same and that's how Yugoslavia and Soviet Union were disbanded.

You can't transition from this below into 1 state through force. It needs to be through trade and cooperation. The best states start cooperating and assimilating the rest. Establishing rules for admission. That's how the US operated when it funded and basically created the European Union.



PS: It is still fukk them Indians though, because they always side with Cacs and hopefully now they will finally understand the true nature of Cacs

 

[Robbie3000]

Listened a little bit and it basically matches what I said in the other thread about Dinesh D'Souza...Most of these people just repeat the same compressed narratives from westerners and never challenge anything. Most of these "based" non-whites are only seen as based due to their ability to mimic western simplification of history.

For instance, the dude praises Western systems that the British left and said that Indians later corrupted everything. However, he never mentions that these systems were basically segregationist systems that marginalized the majority. He never mentions that "Indians" were never a unified identity. Never mentions that the British weaponized those ethnic groups that were more open to support and prioritize post-colonial trade with Britain.
India was a land comprised of many different nation-states and each with different laws, norms, cultures etc. Forcing all of them into 1 new identity, with foreign systems of government, means that you will have more dominant ethnic groups controlling most resources and marginalizing the rest. It means that voting is more about ethnic representation than policies that will benefit the majority. With some people being intentionally less productive because the state itself means close to zero them, on some "My language and culture are never represented, why should I contribute anything to this state?" or "My participation into this state also means my erasure because I have to assimilate to the most dominant groups and historically we have little in common.".
The lack of trust he described didn't just come out of nowhere. The lack of trust stems from the perception that the state prioritizes control over genuine representation. Like, when diverse groups are forced into a single national identity, the less powerful groups start viewing the government as an enforcer of assimilation rather than a protector of unique rights and cultures for each group.

"Western wealth hypnotizes them."
I mean, we are talking about 2-3 generations raised as heavy consumers of western media. And western media has been extremely obsessed with the wealthy. Even Japan, homogeneous place, that wasn't colonized by the west, also had an era(80s to early 90s) of people just obsessed with consuming western goods. Why? Western media consumption. That's when their media decided to fight back and started to focus mostly on promoting their minimalist way of life.

"The 1980s are often characterized as the height of rampant consumerism and excessive materialism, as a time when Japan embraced its financial and material affluence."

Living the Good Life? Waste and Wastefulness in Japan of the 1980s | Department of History

Your RSVP is appreciated.

history.stanford.edu

Most countries in Africa and Americas are also facing similar issues. Europeans also struggled with the same and that's how Yugoslavia and Soviet Union were disbanded.

You can't transition from this below into 1 state through force. It needs to be through trade and cooperation. The best states start cooperating and assimilating the rest. Establishing rules for admission. That's how the US operated when it funded and basically created the European Union.



PS: It is still fukk them Indians though, because they always side with Cacs and hopefully now they will finally understand the true nature of Cacs

Hell, it took Western Europe 1000 years post Roman colonialism to get its act together to the degree that it got itself together.

The veneration of “western civilization” is something else. When you see it from a non White, it’s disgusting.

I will never ever understand the mind of a c00n.

 

[TEH]

Listened a little bit and it basically matches what I said in the other thread about Dinesh D'Souza...Most of these people just repeat the same compressed narratives from westerners and never challenge anything. Most of these "based" non-whites are only seen as based due to their ability to mimic western simplification of history.

For instance, the dude praises Western systems that the British left and said that Indians later corrupted everything. However, he never mentions that these systems were basically segregationist systems that marginalized the majority. He never mentions that "Indians" were never a unified identity. Never mentions that the British weaponized those ethnic groups that were more open to support and prioritize post-colonial trade with Britain.
India was a land comprised of many different nation-states and each with different laws, norms, cultures etc. Forcing all of them into 1 new identity, with foreign systems of government, means that you will have more dominant ethnic groups controlling most resources and marginalizing the rest. It means that voting is more about ethnic representation than policies that will benefit the majority. With some people being intentionally less productive because the state itself means close to zero them, on some "My language and culture are never represented, why should I contribute anything to this state?" or "My participation into this state also means my erasure because I have to assimilate to the most dominant groups and historically we have little in common.".
The lack of trust he described didn't just come out of nowhere. The lack of trust stems from the perception that the state prioritizes control over genuine representation. Like, when diverse groups are forced into a single national identity, the less powerful groups start viewing the government as an enforcer of assimilation rather than a protector of unique rights and cultures for each group.

"Western wealth hypnotizes them."
I mean, we are talking about 2-3 generations raised as heavy consumers of western media. And western media has been extremely obsessed with the wealthy. Even Japan, homogeneous place, that wasn't colonized by the west, also had an era(80s to early 90s) of people just obsessed with consuming western goods. Why? Western media consumption. That's when their media decided to fight back and started to focus mostly on promoting their minimalist way of life.

"The 1980s are often characterized as the height of rampant consumerism and excessive materialism, as a time when Japan embraced its financial and material affluence."

Living the Good Life? Waste and Wastefulness in Japan of the 1980s | Department of History

Your RSVP is appreciated.

history.stanford.edu

Most countries in Africa and Americas are also facing similar issues. Europeans also struggled with the same and that's how Yugoslavia and Soviet Union were disbanded.

You can't transition from this below into 1 state through force. It needs to be through trade and cooperation. The best states start cooperating and assimilating the rest. Establishing rules for admission. That's how the US operated when it funded and basically created the European Union.



PS: It is still fukk them Indians though, because they always side with Cacs and hopefully now they will finally understand the true nature of Cacs

Yessir

The same can be said for several African counties.

Nigeria and SA come to mind especially.

 

[Marlow Stanfield]

 

[Ezekiel 25:17]

Indians got some TOP shelf c00ns in their peoples. Goddaamn.

Even if you feel like your people need to improve, to show ass like this is a bad look

Accountability is bad?

 

[null]

very few people in these threads understand indian culture.

 

[Windows 91]

"You want chips and a soda with that?"

Touching the food barehanded after touching paper money

 

[Neuromancer]

And what's crazy there are tons of Indians everywhere

In Uganda there is so many and they run literally most businesses

When I went to Kenya there was mad of them.

 

[QU Hectic]

Please open the door to your hotel room ma'am, I have to check something

She’s been back to India 2wice after this. Look it up

 

[GoPinheiro]

Hell, it took Western Europe 1000 years post Roman colonialism to get its act together to the degree that it got itself together.

I mean, even till 20th century they were still massacring each other in Bolshevik revolution(that they now blame Jews) or world wars. They killed more than 80 million of their own, in 3 decades, if you focuses solely on these 3 events that I mentioned. PS: Don't even need to include the 19th century independence wars in the New World that were just whites vs whites killing each other for control of the New World.

And Europe, despite their mapping manipulations of representing themselves as bigger than they truly are, is still way smaller than all other regions worldwide.

The veneration of “western civilization” is something else. When you see it from a non White, it’s disgusting.

I will never ever understand the mind of a c00n.

Western education, through its post-colonial Education systems, is the source of blame. The curriculum is designed in a way that glorifies bad X behavior coming from whites while automatically shaming same behavior if it comes from non-whites. It's an education system that forces you to value the things they value, including the bad things(but here, only if Cacs are the main actors). It forces you to see the world through their perspective and lenses. Thus, it also forces you to constantly excuse their degeneracy.

Pick the average c00n and show him a random black person/non-white non-black person killing some animal without any major motives(i.e just because he wants to). To him, that person is barbarian, non-civilized and represents a huge portion of his racial group. Now, show him stats and videos depicting whites as the main group consuming and financially supporting the industry of bullfighting(where people kill live bulls for the sake entertainment) or the main ones killing animals for the sake of trophy hunting...Suddenly, the same c00n doesn't understand racial stats and how some groups lead in behavior X more than others. Nope, he can only see you showing him "humans" engaging in erroneous behavior and "blacks do it too".







Also, below a good meme about it. PS: I'm not supporting Chinese actions here. Just saying that to the average c00n, both are not racially wrong. To them, one is racially wrong and the other is just "humans" acting supid. And this is the result of the type of education system they are forced to consume.

 

[419scam]

She’s been back to India 2wice after this. Look it up

 

[Rarely-Wrong Liggins]

I swear this forum has some sort of collective mental disorder. You all have been roasting Indians like pigs on a spit for almost an entire week but want to when an actual Indian echoes those exact sentiments. fukk outta here cowards. Stand on business.

I will say that of all the immigrants I prefer the Indian due to their ability to rile up both white and blue collar whites and their ability to shut up and be quiet if you're not directly dealing with them. They're usually nicer too, but I've never worked with a lot of Indians. It'll be interesting to see what happens when they flood over here and become the Mexican of the white collar work force.

 

[42 Monks]

 

[Zime]

She’s been back to India 2wice after this. Look it up

That's crazy.

 

[Sohh_lifted]

Im just glad this conversation is being had about Indians taking over jobs, almost every corporation I worked for outsourced to Indians or hired Indians like crazy.
Its also fukkin hilarious White people can understand their accents with nooooooo problems.