the problem that I notice about this site and other sites like it, or other ppl that follow black qb's is that they ONLY really pay attention to whats being said about black qb's so they think that they are the only ones being talked about.
and if they do watch other games they usually watch other teams with good qb's so they don't hear it.
but you don't hear all the dudes saying guys like Orton, or Hoyer, or Shaub,etc,etc being talked about the same cuz most ppl don't watch them. nor are they getting any pub.
and about the younger guys,
how many Jags games do you watch? Bortles gets the same criticism.
how about Carr?
Also I hear TONS of ppl talking shyt about Dalton, Stafford, and Cutler and how they can't really read defenses well and rely solely on their receivers to bail them out(Green, Megatron, and marshall/jeffries respectively)
I clearly said the criticism is different. It's not based on intelligence or being able to grasp the complexities of the game. Do you see ESPN writing articles on Daulton, Stafford and Cutler?
You can't see the difference between the criticisms of black QBs and white ones? You think it's fair and balanced? Really?
Bortles is a rookie on a shyt team. How anyone can expect him to read defenses like Peyton, is baffling. Still, I don't read much criticims of him beyond Jacksonville fans. Jacksonville fans are silly anyways. They wanted McCown to start ahead of Garrard.
The Dalton criticism is again, different. Same with Stafford and Cutler. I'm not saying they don't get criticism. I'm picking on the kind of criticism they get. Tannehil gets some critique but it's still different.
That said...even I think the criticisms on Dalton and Stafford can be a little over the top. They're still young. Folk think QBs come into the league ready to ball out on a consistent basis. Those QBs are considered HOFers. Chris Chandler, Jeff George, Mike Tomzack, Bobby Brister all started...Imagine if the internet was around.
Last edited:





