if you're just gonna post out of context quotes then
im not sure what issue you take with me stating objective facts, unless i can look at the whole conversation
Inside Bernie-world's war on Beto O'Rourke
- Thread starter ☑︎#VoteDemocrat
- Start date
im not sure what issue you take with me stating objective facts, unless i can look at the whole conversationyall don't find it funny how Bernie's stances, voting record, and policies always have "nuances" when it turns up something negative? 
And he's the ONLY politician who seems to get that much slack over here.
Very interesting, indeed...
And he's the ONLY politician who seems to get that much slack over here.
Very interesting, indeed...
You have the most disconnected views on policy bar none on this site.
You're a republican, who votes Democrat because the (D) makes your conscious feel better, but you routinely criticism almost any and all liberal positions.
And you constantly play into this falsehood that if democrats present republicans with watered down bills they sign them instead of either flat out obstructing or further watering down the bill until it no longer serves its purpose.
I support the democrat line on immigration pre-2013.
Full stop.
Bernie literally doesn't.
I don't criticize all "liberal positions"...I want positions that will actually get passed in the law. I'm tired of waiting on court decisions because far lefties hold up the process seeking utopias instead of workable, incremental, sustainable solutions.
if you're just gonna post out of context quotes then
word, frankly i dont think its about race at all, but economics, but of course the racial aspect is there, as well as it being a fact that whites' presence here was stolen. but its survival of the fittest in nature, to put it crudely
it might not be hurting much, but it aint helpin either
Obama isn't walking through that door again. And even if he does, those positions didn't help the liberal agenda at the ballot box.
ill
Superstar
$3 billion a year? Sounds like Trump's wall pays for itself in a few years at that rate.
so you're posting me stating the facts that whites stole america from the indians, and we now live in a country where white privilege exists, as some kind of condemnation of me
good to know
No, just how all over the place and at complete odds with reality your positions are.so you're posting me stating the facts that whites stole america from the indians, and we now live in a country where white privilege exists, as some kind of condemnation of me
if you're concerned with my positions (and you clearly are, given your extensive research
), all you need to do is ask direct questions instead of p*ssyfooting around :jaymelo:
You think you're more important than you are.if you're concerned with my positions (and you clearly are, given your extensive research
You think you're more important than you are.
this is boring. you win brehVoter records are a bytch, huh? 
ill
Superstar
At that rate it would require 8 years, 100 percent success and 0 detainees held.
Rublemath
I was just trolling but I’ll keep it going.
Immigration has been an issue for 30+ years. A wall would have paid for itself 3x already.
