Intel Vets Challenge "Russia Hack" Evidence

Status
Not open for further replies.

General Mills

More often than not I tend to take that L.
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
31,354
Reputation
21,001
Daps
232,790
Reppin
Piffsburgh, PA
Don Jr. admitted to collusion and tweeted proof.:umad::camby:
source.gif
:mjlol::mjlol::mjlol: :dead:
 

MoneyTron

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
27,256
Reputation
3,667
Daps
102,250
Reppin
Atlanta
Doesn't matter what your credentials are if you're not seeing current intelligence then you have just as much evidence as everyone else speculating.

The fact that anyone believes people are making this up just to spite Trump is hilarious.
That's pretty much all there is to it.

Trust These people brehs
:mjlol:
 

MoneyTron

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
27,256
Reputation
3,667
Daps
102,250
Reppin
Atlanta
I noticed the responses in here aren't disputing the actual article :sas1:
I'm not an IC professional and unlike many people on the internet I'm not going to pretend to me.

Its very rare that today's Congress, as divided as it is, is passing any legislation almost unanimously. They did just that because of the cyber attack.
 

Shogun

Veteran
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
25,564
Reputation
5,986
Daps
63,219
Reppin
Knicks
If the investigation proves the worst-case scenario of Russian collusions, Republicans will say fake news.
If the investigation proves there is no intentional collusion, or even that the Democrats orchestrated this whole thing (as these claims suggest), Democrats will do yet another 180 on the investigators and claim corruption.

And onward goes this thing of ours.
photo.jpg
 

Stone Cold

Superstar
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
13,071
Reputation
1,228
Daps
44,103
Reppin
NULL
I'm not an IC professional and unlike many people on the internet I'm not going to pretend to me.

Its very rare that today's Congress, as divided as it is, is passing any legislation almost unanimously. They did just that because of the cyber attack.
If you are basing your evidence of the "Russian hack" on bipartisanship that's very flawed because bipartisanship said Iraq had WMDs.
 

the next guy

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
40,098
Reputation
1,599
Daps
38,373
Reppin
NULL
I'm not an IC professional and unlike many people on the internet I'm not going to pretend to me.

Its very rare that today's Congress, as divided as it is, is passing any legislation almost unanimously. They did just that because of the cyber attack.
Not all the IC, just to be fair.

If the investigation proves the worst-case scenario of Russian collusions, Republicans will say fake news.
If the investigation proves there is no intentional collusion, or even that the Democrats orchestrated this whole thing (as these claims suggest), Democrats will do yet another 180 on the investigators and claim corruption.

And onward goes this thing of ours.
photo.jpg
Exactly. This is close to a fundraising exercise at this
If you are basing your evidence of the "Russian hack" on bipartisanship that's very flawed because bipartisanship said Iraq had WMDs.
I think Russia did interfere in terms of propaganda and misinformation, but all the major countries and superpowers do this. I don't think they hacked voting machines, that's not true.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top