is this your best attempt at a thought provoking thread Dirty Jerz? 
Is It Possible For Everybody To Have A Job?
- Thread starter Dirty_Jerz
- Start date
Dirty_Jerz
Ethiop
is this your best attempt at a thought provoking thread Dirty Jerz?
Want to fight about it chump?
Sorry, I don't fight retarded people.
Broke Wave
The GOAT
not true again. employment is only a contract in a place with contract laws and employee relations. also, in indigenous communities, there were people who built monuments, people who were teachers, hunters, gatherers, farmers, different jobs... so sorry buddy.
Dirty_Jerz
Ethiop
Think what you want, but that's the definition of employment.
Hunting, gathering, etc. is a different matter entirely.
I'm not going to argue with someone who doesn't know the definition of what he's talking about.
people in egalitarian tribes don't do those things for money. They do it because they want to and HAVE to, to survive. shyt isn't a job at all.. it's called being Human
Black smoke and cac jokes
Your daps are mine
Yes, it is possible that everyone can be employed but it is not beneficial for the economy. Full employment means that everyone has a job but it does not translate into an efficient economy since it is important that everyone has a job that matches their skill sets. Mcdonalds can lower their wages or get subsidies to employ the 9-10% (I believe) of the unemployed people but it wouldn't benefit the country as a whole since people are not fully utilizing their capabilities.
a low amount of unemployment is good and actually indicates that people are still optimistic about finding the job that best fits them.
a low amount of unemployment is good and actually indicates that people are still optimistic about finding the job that best fits them.
Broke Wave
The GOAT
no. hunting , gathering things of those nature are jobs. your not going to argue with someone who knows more than you, because you don't want to risk being embarrased any further.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Transformation_(book)
:obamaword: and I'm the one supposedly telling people they are unqualified for convos.
You're mean Broke
Holy shyt, I think I just had a Deja Vu moment. I swear I saw this sequence of posts in one of my dreams..Real shiit!I've already won the argument.
You don't know what the definition of employment is. That's why you've fallen back on just using the word "job" in the colloquial sense.
Being contracted, orally or otherwise, to perform a specific, regular duty in the form of a job by an EMPLOYER is being EMPLOYED.
Nobody "employs" a hunter-gatherer, therefore he cannot by definition be "employed." The fact that he associates with people in a tribal band (likely based on a common ancestor) and trades with them does not mean he is "employed" to do so.
Just because everyone in a tribe had stuff to do, doesn't mean the concept of "employment" is applicable.
Broke Wave
The GOAT
no i didnt go back to the colloquial sense... and you changed the subject... read the fukking thread title you moron... read it again... then read it trey times... and then read my fukking answer... jesus chris
@BarNone you rubbed off on me
Last edited by a moderator:
RicanFury
Come Home With Me
Impossible, if everyone has a job what happens to the people working at the unemployment office
yin and yang