Larry isn't "under"rated, people rightfully give him respect as an All-Timer. Like, literally all the fukking time, and have been for years...
He's only "under"rated if you think he belongs in the same class as TO and Moss and Rice----->he doesn't. There are levels of greatness and he's obviously one of the best receivers ever, but hes rated properly. Somewhere in the class of receivers below those three, the holy trinity of receiving...
This is the class of elite receivers Fitz has played against in his 16-year career (no order):
Moss, Owens, Harrison, Chad Johnson, ****, Smith, Andre Johnson, Wayne, Calvin Johnson, Brown, Jones, Hopkins, Thomas...
So you guys need to tell me where Fitz falls in this pack, because you can make the argument that each and every one of those receivers are as good or better than Fitz. And for Moss and TO, probably shouldn't be in a reasonable convo with Fitz...
He's overrated because people want him to be mentioned with Moss and Owens yet when you start lining him up against other greats that played in his time, Fitz isnt exactly standing head and shoulders above the rest, is he?