I was thinking of doing a steve nash/mark price thread but I think nash is better to be honest
played longer, won mvp awards and shyt, just a good if not better shooter in his prime than mark price was and of course also a great passer
I think a fairer comparison would've been john stockton because neither won a title or league mvp
Nash had the better career, but if you used strictly the eye test nash was better offensively by a pinch and price was the better defender (by a lot).
Nash winning MVP's has more to do with the circumstances involved then him being deserving although i believe he had a legit argument to win both.
You put nash in the NBA in 85 and i guarantee you he has 0 MVP's