If she denies it entirely then she's stupid, but if she disputes accounts/numbers etc then she's got some common sense 

If you're not a historian that's just into a pure esoteric debate, what is the point of disputing whether its 6 million or 4 million if you're not trying to invalidate the level of Jewish suffering and atrocityIf she denies it entirely then she's stupid, but if she disputes accounts/numbers etc then she's got some common sense![]()
I'm not going to lie. Sarah Silverman is a good looking Woman. I'm not trying to get Kimmeled.
They might look good up to 100 years old.tho to keep 100 hunna
Only 2 million more people? How precious does one regard a single human life then? It's accountability. The jewish people have parlayed this atrocity into a favorable position for themselves and such shouldn't have a problem with someone presenting a factual assessment of their history if it is possible. My problem is not with the jewish people on the whole but the double standards that the majority seem to live by.If you're not a historian that's just into a pure esoteric debate, what is the point of disputing whether its 6 million or 4 million if you're not trying to invalidate the level of Jewish suffering and atrocity![]()
I'm not going to lie. Sarah Silverman is a good looking Woman. I'm not trying to get Kimmeled.
Only thing that's messed up about the holocaust is the Jews made it seem like nobody else suffered in that war. The Russians lost about the same amount of people to even more brutal methods of killing by the Germans. The Chinese had it even worse at the hands of the Japanese. Germans at least let a good amount of Jews work or flee...The Japanese went through China slaughtering everybody with no other options.
Exactly! Anti-semitism was huge around the world and particularly in Europe before Hitler was even born. There were pogroms against the Jews decades before the Holocaust. It was one reason why the initial anti Jewish laws established in Germany when Hitler rose to power were accepted by ordinary Germans because Europeans were used to used to it.True. Hell even in the concentration camps it wasn't only the Jews getting exterminated.
What else is fukked up on the part of Europeans is that Hitler has been presented as some kind of monster, an anormal abberation while anti-semitism was high in ALL OF EUROPE before WW2 and that Hitler's policies were a logical consequence of other well-established political and social ideas in Germany (Lest we forget what Imperial Germany did in Namibia years before Hitler was anywhere near power). Europeans use Hitler and Nazis to divert attention from what they have done themselves, so it's not only Jews/Israël using the Holocaust for political means. Hitler was no "surprise" in Europe, he was a logical consequence. Extreme yes, but logical.
Exactly! Anti-semitism was huge around the world and particularly in Europe before Hitler was even born. There were pogroms against the Jews decades before the Holocaust. It was one reason why the initial anti Jewish laws established in Germany when Hitler rose to power were accepted by ordinary Germans because Europeans were used to used to it.
That is a common theme due to the education system in America at least. I'm white and had no clue about what the other nations did around the world until after high school and learning on my own about world history. Picasso and nearly every other famous artist from that country got their style from the art that was brought back from Africa, the Americas and the Carribean. They got that art from pillaging places as they went. Hitler was just a magnified version of what was already happening but he decided to mess with Russia and the surrounding nations so things got messy.Yep. One of the reasons why so many gladly collaborated with Nazi Germany (People always talk about "Nazis", but hardly ever of French, Belgians, Dutch, Italians, Croats, Austrians, Hungarians etc...who collaborated with them). Again, Hitler is used as a boogeyman by most Europeans to try to show that he was not a "normal occurence". It's easier to present him as a monster than as a logical result of century-long anti-semitism, rise of nationalism, post WW1 german feeling of humiliation (caused by the Versailles treaty) and "scientific racism" that was promoted all over Europe. It allows Europeans to distance themselves from them. Nowadays when one talks about antisemitism in France for example, it is implied that they're talking about muslims, to the point that people believe antisemitism was imported by Arab immigrants, which is total bs.
That is a common theme due to the education system in America at least. I'm white and had no clue about what the other nations did around the world until after high school and learning on my own about world history. Picasso and nearly every other famous artist from that country got their style from the art that was brought back from Africa, the Americas and the Carribean. They got that art from pillaging places as they went. Hitler was just a magnified version of what was already happening but he decided to mess with Russia and the surrounding nations so things got messy.