Is the Nets trade with the Celtics the stupidest trade in NBA history?

dh86

Superstar
Joined
Jun 4, 2013
Messages
24,999
Reputation
1,071
Daps
56,394
Reppin
Detroit
:dahell:

The Hornets would have gotten Odom, Scola, Kevin Martin and Goran Dragic.

Thats a much better haul than fukking Chris Kaman, Eric Gordon, Al-Farouq Aminu, and the pick that became Austin Rivers.

At the day of the trade, Odom was 32 and Scola was 31 and played the same position as David West. The fukk would that have done for NO? Kevin Martin was 28, but for Chris Paul? That's really better than 2 recent lottery picks and a coming lottery pick?
 

Reality Check

Keepin' it 100
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,518
Reputation
2,465
Daps
54,706
I feel sorry for whoever gets Billy King as their next GM

I feel sorry for any owner desperate enough to bring up Billy King's name in a "who should we hire as our next GM" discussion. Even bringing him into consideration would be scraping the bottom of the barrel.
 

MJ Truth

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 1, 2015
Messages
39,006
Reputation
3,745
Daps
155,089
Of course it's dumb IN RETROSPECT.

But had the shyt worked out the way they planned (them winning a title in that 2 year span after the trade) then nobody looks at it as stupid. They just basically took a shot that was high-risk, high-reward, and they lost. :yeshrug:

I really never thought it was stupid at the beginning, so I can't say it's stupid now because it didn't work. If somebody called it a desperate move I wouldn't disagree though. That Russian just wanted to make Brooklyn a title team immediately, and this is the flip side when it doesn't work.

It never really had a possibility to really fail, to me, for Boston though, even if they never end up getting high draft picks.
 

lepard

All Star
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
3,400
Reputation
262
Daps
6,141
Reppin
NULL
Of course it's dumb IN RETROSPECT.

But had the shyt worked out the way they planned (them winning a title in that 2 year span after the trade) then nobody looks at it as stupid. They just basically took a shot that was high-risk, high-reward, and they lost. :yeshrug:

I really never thought it was stupid at the beginning, so I can't say it's stupid now because it didn't work. If somebody called it a desperate move I wouldn't disagree though. That Russian just wanted to make Brooklyn a title team immediately, and this is the flip side when it doesn't work.

It never really had a possibility to really fail, to me, for Boston though, even if they never end up getting high draft picks.

You're right, if they win a championship, it was worth it... they gambled and lost.

Still doesn't make sense as to why the Nets offered the same picks WITH protections against top 3?
 

Sonny Corinthos

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
25,733
Reputation
1,367
Daps
28,517
Reppin
Port Charles, NY
Nah can't argue this one how do you trade all this intending to have a 2 year window TOPS and then not even get a shot with that group?

King basically blew the future while blowing present as well:dahell:


With that said if the Celts don't get the number one pick yesterday it's not the unanimous dumbest trade. Them hitting number 1 even put Ainge in the realm as one of the greatest Fleecers of all time
 

MJ Truth

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 1, 2015
Messages
39,006
Reputation
3,745
Daps
155,089
:dahell:

The Hornets would have gotten Odom, Scola, Kevin Martin and Goran Dragic.

Thats a much better haul than fukking Chris Kaman, Eric Gordon, Al-Farouq Aminu, and the pick that became Austin Rivers.
Yeah, not really. :yeshrug:

It's all about the same level.
 

mastermind

Rest In Power Kobe
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
64,980
Reputation
6,464
Daps
173,667
At the day of the trade, Odom was 32 and Scola was 31 and played the same position as David West. The fukk would that have done for NO? Kevin Martin was 28, but for Chris Paul? That's really better than 2 recent lottery picks and a coming lottery pick?
Scola woulda been a back up.

And you intentionally left off Goran Dragic?

Yeah, not really. :yeshrug:

It's all about the same level.
Goran Dragic was an all nba player a couple of years later.

At worst its a push, but that is better than what the Hornets got in the Clippers trade.


At the end of the day, that lakers/hornets failed trade does not belong in this conversation.
 

dh86

Superstar
Joined
Jun 4, 2013
Messages
24,999
Reputation
1,071
Daps
56,394
Reppin
Detroit
Scola woulda been a back up.

And you intentionally left off Goran Dragic?


Goran Dragic was an all nba player a couple of years later.

At worst its a push, but that is better than what the Hornets got in the Clippers trade.


At the end of the day, that lakers/hornets failed trade does not belong in this conversation.

What was Goran Dragic as of December 2011?
 

dh86

Superstar
Joined
Jun 4, 2013
Messages
24,999
Reputation
1,071
Daps
56,394
Reppin
Detroit
what was Marc Gasol in 2008?

What was Tom Brady in 2001?

What was Steph Curry in 2009?

1. Young euro player that was a trade throw in for his star brother.
2. Patriots starting QB replacing Drew Bledsoe
3. #7 pick of the draft pegged by most to be a star

Now for my question?
 

JerseyBoy23

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
29,602
Reputation
4,117
Daps
71,183
Reppin
Essex County, NJ
Yes it was. The only solace is that Marcus Smart and Jaylen Brown aren't once in a lifetime players.

If Markelle is a great player, Billy King can't ever step foot in the tri-state area.
 

mastermind

Rest In Power Kobe
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
64,980
Reputation
6,464
Daps
173,667
Of course it's dumb IN RETROSPECT.

But had the shyt worked out the way they planned (them winning a title in that 2 year span after the trade) then nobody looks at it as stupid. They just basically took a shot that was high-risk, high-reward, and they lost. :yeshrug:

I really never thought it was stupid at the beginning, so I can't say it's stupid now because it didn't work. If somebody called it a desperate move I wouldn't disagree though. That Russian just wanted to make Brooklyn a title team immediately, and this is the flip side when it doesn't work.

It never really had a possibility to really fail, to me, for Boston though, even if they never end up getting high draft picks.
a lot of people thought it was stupid from the beginning. I did.

KG and Pierce looked semi washed their last season in Boston.

1. Young euro player that was a trade throw in for his star brother.
2. Patriots starting QB replacing Drew Bledsoe
3. #7 pick of the draft pegged by most to be a star

Now for my question?
Goran Dragic was a young euro player who had potential.

What are we doing here breh? Trades are made for potential and Dragic became a really good to great NBA player. That would have helped the Hornets out more than Eric Gordon or Al Fariq Aminu.

It was not a bad trade at all.
 

dh86

Superstar
Joined
Jun 4, 2013
Messages
24,999
Reputation
1,071
Daps
56,394
Reppin
Detroit
Lakers fans didn't get Chris Paul for free like they got Pau Gasol (and Kareem, Worthy, Magic, etc) for free and they're still tight about it. None of the things Boston gotten in the deal has panned out yet, so we have to wait to see if it tops one of the numerous lopsided Lakers deals
 
Top