I haven't read this book. And honestly the first book was so through I don't think he needed to refute anything. Every claim he made in THEY CAME BEFORE COLUMBUS was sourced with primary source materials.
His critics were the same as those that argue against Ancient Egypt being black. To them it comes to one simple theory: "they couldn't possibly be nikkas". PERIOD. They never present any evidence to the contrary. They just deny, deny, deny.
