Is This A Catch By Jesse James?

[tjax03]

If it was the browns playing defense refs wouldve ruled it a td.

It mattered who the steelers was playing. Bet that

 

[mozichrome]

No
When he decided to stretch that ball out that meant the stretch was now a part of the catch motion

If he didn't stretch the ball shiit would've been all great

 

[Ronnie Lott]

Not a catch

 

[L@CaT]

If the ball crosses the white it's a td.

Doesn't matter, rules state you have to come down with the ball cleanly. He clearly bobbled and dropped it at the end. Incomplete was the right call based on the rules.

 

[JLova]

It is a dumb fukking rule. Grey area to help the league determine the outcome of the game.

 

[King Poetic]

 

[mr x]

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

It was a reception after the catch was secured with his knees on the ground.... made a football move and crossed the plane....... touchdown at best.... down on 1 at worst

 

[Throwbacksample]

FROM NOW ON WHEN A WR CATCHES THE BALL IN THE ENDZONE DBS NEED TO JUST SMACK IT OUT RIGHT AFTER.

DOESN'T MATTER IF HE CATCHES IT. JUST SMACK IT OUT.

WE NOW KNOW WHAT A TD IS

DBs have always been trying to do that bro.

 

[Darealtwo1]

DBs have always been trying to do that bro.

No....I mean legit. Smack it out after they catch it. Even after the the ref puts up their hands. Just go smack it out. They could be celebrating. Just smack it out.

No more catches.

 

[Throwbacksample]

It was a reception after the catch was secured with his knees on the ground.... made a football move and crossed the plane....... touchdown at best.... down on 1 at worst

Why would he be down at the 1? Nobody touched him.

 

[Moody]

 

[Cynical Thoughts]

It was a reception after the catch was secured with his knees on the ground.... made a football move and crossed the plane....... touchdown at best.... down on 1 at worst

This. I thought the "football move" after the catch determined if it's a fumble or a catch.

 

[Larry Lambo]

When it happened I thought he was on the ground when he caught it turned around and reached, but now that I see it again he was falling the whole time.

He made a football move, but it according to the dumb ass rule he had to maintain control after making a move that clearly was only possible if he had physically caught the ball in the first place.

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

Why would he be down at the 1? Nobody touched him.

If they wanted to rule it no TD since he so called lost possession(even though he broke the plane) then they should rule the catch at the one since he made a football play for a TD.... it’s the reason why the whole breaking the plane was instituted... to make it easier to score.... hence a so called more entertaining game... I’m sure there are examples of players diving for the goal line and losing control of the ball.... but since the plane was broken, it was called a TD