The bottomline?
The bottom line is Jordan was 30 when he won his 3rd....LeBron was 29 & 30 and was losing in the NBA Finals and we don't know the outcome of him at 31 just yet.
I say that to say 2 things....don't compare his Championship resume to Jordan's because Bron's would never compare, & secondly, Jordan was still winning NBA Championships (already had 3 by 30 years old) while LeBron is still searching for his 3rd ring at 31 years old even though he's had double the amount of attempts than Jordan had (3 for Jordan...6 for LeBron) to do so.
Lebron ends his career with 6 rings would it matter how many times he lost in his finals lmao.
It''s dumb. Most superstars can't even get two the finals twice.
Only Lebron has these ridiculous stipulations and concenssions lmao
Jordan had two hall of famers, Pippen and Rodman lmao.
Jordan's teams were stacked and Jordan had the weakest comp in the Finals.
None of the teams he beat were all time great teams.
If Lebron beats Golden state, he has a better run than Jordan.
Golden State, The Spurs, and The Thunder are better than any of the teams jordan beat in the finals lmao.
The best team Jordan beat were the Utah fukking jazz where he was guarded by Brian Russell lmao.






phase, we can take an educated guess as to why Jerry West was picked over them (without ever being named a league MVP or winning any Championships at the time while Russell had 5 MVPs & 11 Championships and Wilt had 4 MVPs and 1 Championships) as well as it just so happening to be the exact same year Jerry West became the only player in NBA History to be named NBA Finals MVP while playing on the losing team
