Dusty Bake Activate
Fukk your corny debates
Nah, you're just too emotionally invested in your favorite team to be able to assess them with any sort of objectivity so you go on angry tirades and ad hominem attacks like this whenever people raise the legitimate points about Tom Brady or the Patriots history legacy. And yes, spygate, the tuck rule, and having a kicker who was always money in the clutch in big games are legitimate points that will always be in any discussion regarding Brady's all time ranking amongst his NFL peers. The first two are about fairness and integrity. The last is just putting in context what an asset Vinatieri was...that's fair game for debate just like Montana having Rice or whatever other personnel advantages he or anyone else may have had is.This is low-hanging fruit troll bait. People basically got sonned into silence over this nonsense and stopped saying it about 5 years ago. Like, there's literally a window in SOHH/Coli history where this stuff was refuted so thoroughly that you got clowned for posting it ever again. Maybe you missed the era.
You're a good poster on many things, but your football analysis is always sounds like ESPN talking points. You literally just (a) repeated an unfounded bunch of bullshyt about the Pats filming walkthroughs and supposedly stealing Steelers signals and (b) said "tuck rule" and Vinatieri as if those are actual things that detract from Brady. It's not even worth explaining how flawed that nonsense is at this point. It's tiring.
Anyhow, Montana's SB performance puts him over Brady for now. If Brady wins again then he's the GOAT. His overall resume is more impressive.
That all being said, I still consider Brady #2 all time, very close to being #1. You view him in the same way a child views his mommy, where mommy is perfect and any mention of anything that isn't complimentary about mommy is wrong and whoever said it is bad, so it makes discussions like this with you difficult.


Bradshaw?

