Never too late. Either by disease or war or natural disasters. Maybe a combination of thins we will lose a lot of people. Then humans will understand that just having kids for the sake of it isn't the wave anymore.
The correct figure for the percentage of the earth's land mass which is actually occupied by humans is .03%.
this is some evil demonic shyt....the same mfs who destroyed the rainforest in Brazil. the same mfs who want to block out the sun, sterilize people without their consent. man fukk these demons.
Solar Geoengineering: Why Bill Gates Wants It, But These Experts Want To Stop It
The Earth is warming rapidly as a result of human-caused emissions. Some scientists think re-engineering the atmosphere to deflect more of the sun's heat could help. Others are warning that such a move would be both dangerous and unethical.www.forbes.com
get in tune these people engineering society is the reason so many are unhappy including the women they purport to be championing.
it's no wonder that 2 gay demons are behind the inception and proliferation of the whole abortion rights thing (not to be confused with allowing women to about for health or rape but the abortion as a contraceptive idea).
man ya'll nikkas getting thrown in a trick bag and don't even see it.
we don't have a resource problem we have a restrictive-market problem when gov't and interest groups such as the IMF are artificially controlling the standard of living and development of nations.
you have housing around the world more unaffordable than ever because a few hedge funds are gobbling up homes for higher prices than the market would dictate and yet no gov't does a thing to fix it.
you have countries like the Ukraine as central wheat producers while countries in africa are disallowed from producing and taking to market their own produce, wheat, grains etc. wake the fukk up. this fukker is likely part of their brain-trust.
when he had interstellar spacecraft switching from nuclear power back to fueling by oil again in like 25000 A.D., as if ANYONE would ever be using either of those as a fuel source by the time we get to interstellar travel.
I watched the first video, what in that interview did you consider an impressive future prediction?
The population math was just simple arithmetic, anyone can do that. He didn't even factor in any projections for how the growth rate may change over time. And it has been obvious for some time that the world doesn't contain the resources to support its population a US-standard lifestyle. That's not anything special, it was known in the 1960s, not to mention the 1980s. People just want to plug their fingers in their ears and keep supercharging capitalism anyway.
Besides that obvious fact, his analysis of the problems and solutions sounded a little bit naive. People don't have babies cause we celebrate Mother's Day lol. I wish he had done more research into the actual social and economic reasons for high birth rates and applied that rather than just using uninformed pop psychology reasoning.
He does the same thing a lot of scientists do - they know they're smart, and they know they know a lot about certain subjects, so they just assume they can speak with authority on other subjects outside their expertise that they haven't studied at all. From what I've heard, Asimov is a very bright dude, but that means little if you don't know the subject.
Also, as a kid reading the Foundation series in the 1990s, I was already
