Honestly,
I understand the risks associated with IT's size, defense, etc.
But I think it's a bit disingenuous to somehow put his performance and ability in the same category of "temporary" as Nate Robinson's Bulls playoff play a few years ago when Rose went down.
Outside of his size, is there much to go on that he can't perform at atleast 80% of what he's doing now?
The Celtics are in a very good spot, though, considering their draft position. I'm generally a "fan favorite" type fan regarding loyalty so take my opinion with a grain of salt but I say give him the money.