Isiah Thomas GOES OFF on this current NBA era

NYC Rebel

...on the otherside of the pond
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
71,702
Reputation
11,560
Daps
241,626
He's not even remotely overrated. We had this talk last year whenit was explained thoroughly. Reggie's efficiency/volume dwarfs Mitch's.


I'm not sure how you're ranking the best Pacers teams, but Reggie was their best player from '90-'01. Big reason they were able to still contend when he was a shell of himself is because of the emergence of Ron Artest who the Pacers damn sure could've used in the mid '90s. If you look at how insane those Pacers offenses produced when he was on the court (122 Ortg on average during that 11 year span, which is incredible) he did more than his share to keep the team relevant. By the NBA's cupcake HOF standards the man should moonwalk there, that's not a borderline discussion

Yeah, it's fair to consider Miller one dimensional. But does that matter when he was borderline dominant at the one aspect of the game and it had a huge ripple effect on the entirety of his team's offense? And then he got even better in the postseason which is the biggest stage this game has to offer? And he didn't just shoot, but he did a great job of getting to the FT line which is a very important skill for volume scorers. His off ball movement wasn't just spotting up which a lot of people define it as. but also cutting to the basket, leaking out in transition where he was remarkable and being able to hit shots even when well contested by a closing defender.

Miller isn't seen as GAWD shooting guard idk where this even comes from. The consensus opinion is that he's a scrawny, irritating one dimensional yet elite jumpshooter that had a long career with the Pacers. Most famous thing he's remembered for is the 8 points in 9 seconds stretch against the Knicks in the '95 playoffs and doing a choking gesture toward Spike Lee. He's had a lot of other incredible postseason performances aside from that, but we don't talk about them. People will talk about how garbage he is as a broadcaster before his performance in the '95 PS against the Hawks (31 ppg; 66 TS%) and Magic (25.9ppg; 66 TS%). Nobody with a brain is saying he's on par with Jordan, just that he's had some good moments against MJ which is true.

.
What is tnbscopy/paste gibberish?

Half of that rubbish was someone posing questions and scenarios for him to answer.

What is that trash?

Reggie is one of the most overrated players ever. HOF who would have never made an all NBA team of any kind had it not been for a third one. While he played during the season, he was rightfully gauged as a step above average player, nothing more. The playoffs, facing the Knicks and orbiting planet Jordan in the 90s gave overrated his stature
 

Trip

slippery slope
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
21,395
Reputation
257
Daps
18,345
Reppin
FL
What is tnbscopy/paste gibberish?

Half of that rubbish was someone posing questions and scenarios for him to answer.

What is that trash?

Reggie is one of the most overrated players ever. HOF who would have never made an all NBA team of any kind had it not been for a third one. While he played during the season, he was rightfully gauged as a step above average player, nothing more. The playoffs, facing the Knicks and orbiting planet Jordan in the 90s gave overrated his stature

The most efficient 2 guard ever is a step above average lmao ok pal.
 

Trip

slippery slope
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
21,395
Reputation
257
Daps
18,345
Reppin
FL
He was a one dimensional player who could shoot while his teams struggled at shooting

He was a fukking SHOOTING guard who is literally the most efficient shooting player of all time. If your one dimension is the best of all time that doesn't make you average. It would be like calling Ray Allen or Rodman average.
 

YaBoy

All Star
Joined
Jul 29, 2012
Messages
3,799
Reputation
680
Daps
11,822
Reppin
NULL
Goes to mindset. I never saw any of these old school players besides Miller pulling that shyt. Be a man
fukk outta here. LeBron & others do it because it's effective & helps the team win. If they stopped rewarding flopping & started rewarding clotheslining, we'd have a much more physical game. Probably worse than the 80s/90s becauae of how much more athletic players are
 

NYC Rebel

...on the otherside of the pond
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
71,702
Reputation
11,560
Daps
241,626
He was a fukking SHOOTING guard who is literally the most efficient shooting player of all time. If your one dimension is the best of all time that doesn't make you average. It would be like calling Ray Allen or Rodman average.
He was a shooting guard who couldn't create shots off the dribble or create offense for anyone else. One of the reasons the Pacers had those shifty scoring droughts was when he wasn't shooting,he brought nothing else for their offense. So bad was it that The Pacers wee force to dump the ball into Antonio Davis at times, hoping his struggle post game could produce additional offense
 

Trip

slippery slope
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
21,395
Reputation
257
Daps
18,345
Reppin
FL
He was a shooting guard who couldn't create shots off the dribble or create offense for anyone else. One of the reasons the Pacers had those shifty scoring droughts was when he wasn't shooting,he brought nothing else for their offense. So bad was it that The Pacers wee force to dump the ball into Antonio Davis at times, hoping his struggle post game could produce additional offense

1. Creating a shot off a dribble vs creating a shot off a screen isn't any different. The points count exactly the same. There's no inherent value in shot creation if the shot you're creating isn't going in(most chuckers have this issue). Millers efficiency made up for his lack of ability in "shot creation"

2. Miller was literally the only player on those Pcers teams that could bring any offense cocnistently. It's not his fault he was surrounded by crappy offensive players is it? Put Pippen on the Pacers they'd at least have 1 ring.
 

The Devil's Advocate

Call me Dad
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
36,597
Reputation
8,160
Daps
100,945
Reppin
Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven
You think YouTube highlights shroud itself around 77 to 71 final scores?
no i think people who actually played the game at a hall of fame level know 29384901749287412938432947% more than anyone on the coli


i also believe looking at numbers is a retarded way to judge a game you never laid eyes on before... then telling people who watched decades of full games live that you know more... once again.... retarded
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,331
Reputation
19,940
Daps
204,118
Reppin
the ether
His entire legacy is built off two fukking games, one of which was a series where the pacers got blown out in game 7 anyway :russ:

Okay, now you're way undervaluing Reggie. He was the greatest shooter of his era. I loved watching him play. I know the two games you're referring to (the 8 in 9 game and the 25 in the fourth game) but he had plenty of other great games too, including a third against the Knicks I remember distinctly where he had like 11-13 points in the last 4 minutes.

The part I agree with is that a one-dimensional shooter is not a great bet for your lone superstar on a competitive team. People are talking about Ray Allen....but what was the best team that Ray Allen was ever the star of? How good would a team be with Klay Thompson as the star?




The current east outside of obviously Cleveland isn't any better than the Knicks or Pacers of the 90's who couldn't beat Chicago. I'd argue the Penny and Shaq Magic were easily better than anyone lebron has had to go through in the east over the last 5 years

The Raptors would kill the 1990s Knicks and Pacers, and they aren't even a top-5 team that Lebron has had to face. The second-best scorer on the Raptors is better than the best scorer on either of those teams, and Jonas Valanciunas/Demarre Carrol/Terrance Ross/Cory Joseph/Patrick Patterson form an unremarkable but solid supporting cast for Lowry/DeRozen.

Think about this. The Raptors have SIX guys who are shooting 36%+ from three, and DeRozen isn't even one of those, and they don't even rely on the three. You would have to put the 1997 Knicks/Pacers together into a superteam to match that.



Those Magic looked great on paper, but you have to remember how shallow they were, what awful coaching they had, and what babies Shaq and Penny were in the league. They hadn't hit 25 yet when that team broke up (shades of the 2012 Thunder). And in the 1996 ECF nearly everyone not named Shaq/Penny got hurt. Of the players who played all 4 games, ONLY TWO WHO AVERAGED MORE THAN 3.5 PPG IN THE SERIES. The starting lineup in Game 4 included Dennis Scott, Anthony Bowie, and an injured Jon Koncak, with Brooks Thompson, Donald Royal, and Jon Wolf as the only three guys to come off the bench. Shaq only took 13 shots in that game being guarded by Luc Longley...and the Magic still only lost by 5

The 1990s babies in here don't even know what the heck I just said. Damn, I forgot who the hell Brooks Thompson and Donald Royal were, and they combined for 20+ points in that game....Brooks Thompson was the 4th leading scorer on both teams combined. :deadmanny:

Here's a SI writeup from 1996 about that series:

The series so lacked drama that, after Chicago held Orlando to 10 fourth-quarter points in its 86-67 victory in Saturday's Game 3, the only question left
was whether the Magic would be eliminated before all the members of center Shaquille O'Neal and point guard Anfernee (Penny) Hardaway's supporting cast were wearing supporting casts. Power forward Horace Grant had one on his left arm, thanks to the hyper-extended elbow he suffered in Game 1 that sidelined him for the rest of the series, and guard Nick Anderson left the O-rena after Game 3 with one on his right wrist, badly sprained in a fourth-quarter fall.

Jon Koncak, who took Grant's place in the starting lineup, played in Game 3 after a cortisone shot helped dull the pain in his injured left knee--if only temporarily. "I'm going to have a wonderful time getting out of bed tomorrow morning," he said after the game. Koncak wasn't the only one for whom rising from the sack was a dismal experience. Guard Brian Shaw was scratched for Game 3 when he woke up the day of the game with severe neck spasms. "When things like that happen," Hardaway said, "you can't help thinking that maybe it wasn't meant to be."

It got so bad for the Magic that even Chicago couldn't help but feel a touch of sympathy. "When I shook hands with [Orlando coach] Brian Hill before the game, I asked him what next could go wrong with his basketball team," Bulls coach Phil Jackson said after Game 3. "I guess he found out today." And when asked to assess the disheartened Magic's performance, most of the Chicago players tried to be tactful, particularly after their Game 3 victory in which they held Orlando to the second-fewest points in playoff history....

One question the Magic should ask itself is whether it is as passionate about winning a title as a championship team must be. Even given the Magic's injuries, the ease with which Chicago handled Orlando solidified the Magic's reputation as a team that is far more flash than substance. All the Little Pennys and Shaq Fus don't add up to a single championship ring.

That was the ONLY year that the Bulls beat the Magic (the year before they lost 4 games to 2 in the ECSF with Jordan). Their lineup was so decimated that they basically had two capable NBA-level players, so you can't talk about that like it was some great victory.

You can't accuse me of shytting on the 1990s Magic, a team that took out the Jordan Bulls, when even the 1990s writers were shytting on the 1990s Magic. :bryan:






This forum the only group of people I've heard of consistently hating 90's basketball :dahell:

It was an expansion era. Six new teams in seven years. How could that possibly not dilute the talent?

Not to mention that the ballers of the 1990s were growing up in the 1970s, when basketball popularity was at a huge low, and then in the 1980s when the crack epidemic hit. And it was all before global popularity massively increased the talent pool. So how could they possibly have not had less talent?

Ya'all always have to rely on some sort of magic to explain how the 1980s/1990s could be more talented than today's era. Take a small talent pool and water it down quickly with a bunch of expansion teams, and you have a diluted product. That's obvious logic even before you start talking about a one-dimensional shooter being the best player on the team that challenged Jordan the hardest or a guy who looks at the ground when he dribbles being Jordan's biggest one-on-one competition.




And arguing against NBA legends to do so. And think they right. Cause YouTube highlights

Wilt and Russell hated against the 1980s and 1990s, and Oscar Robertson is always talking about how tough the early 1960s were when you can watch the tapes and see that the talent level was a complete joke. Old heads ALWAYS cape for their own era. It takes massive humility to admit that an improved product is better than you were.
 

El Coupeacabra

Diamond Teeth Samurai
Joined
Nov 22, 2016
Messages
3,673
Reputation
1,525
Daps
21,362
Reppin
214/254/512/210/281
no i think people who actually played the game at a hall of fame level know 29384901749287412938432947% more than anyone on the coli


i also believe looking at numbers is a retarded way to judge a game you never laid eyes on before... then telling people who watched decades of full games live that you know more... once again.... retarded
Peep game...players are actually the worst people to listen to BECAUSE they're just natrually brilliant at what they do. Look at all the coaches in the league and tell me how many played at a hall of fame level??

Kobe Bryant cannot explain how to make ridiculous contested shots. Michael Jordan cannot teach you perfect post up footwork. Those two guys would be terrible coaches because their advice would literally be "shoot the ball and make it."

Most coaches and developmental staff are marginal players who stuck around thorough intense practice and knowledge of the game. Most analysis can't play a lick of basketball but can explain it 1000% better than the average player because they HAVE to learn and understand the game.

Do you think players watch highlight film of themselves and say "damn I go hard as shyt...let me watch my own tape to see exactly why I go so damn hard!" ???
 

The Devil's Advocate

Call me Dad
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
36,597
Reputation
8,160
Daps
100,945
Reppin
Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven
Peep game...players are actually the worst people to listen to BECAUSE they're just natrually brilliant at what they do. Look at all the coaches in the league and tell me how many played at a hall of fame level??

Kobe Bryant cannot explain how to make ridiculous contested shots. Michael Jordan cannot teach you perfect post up footwork. Those two guys would be terrible coaches because their advice would literally be "shoot the ball and make it."

Most coaches and developmental staff are marginal players who stuck around thorough intense practice and knowledge of the game. Most analysis can't play a lick of basketball but can explain it 1000% better than the average player because they HAVE to learn and understand the game.

Do you think players watch highlight film of themselves and say "damn I go hard as shyt...let me watch my own tape to see exactly why I go so damn hard!" ???
no i don't think players watch HIGHLIGHT film

they watch actual game film... not only by themselves.. but with their entire team. then they have highly paid coaches and staff who watch it with them

while watching this tape. they slow it down, rewind it, stop and pause it, while pointing out things that were missed, telling people what they should have been doing, complementing those who performed their duties correctly

THEN they go out and practice the shyt for another 3-4 hours a day... then they play 82 games worth of it


on their off time, they also watch games just being a fan... then they retire and get jobs that require them to watch the shyt and analyze and do the same shyt their coach was doing to them


nikkas watching highlights and 50 games a season ain't really doing anything close to that




you telling me kobe and jordan, who was coached by one of the greatest players of all time... couldn't teach the coli a little something something about the game of basketball??? maybe they couldn't teach more than coach pop... but they damn sure gonna teach more than anyone in this forum unless we got some coaches in here that i don't know about
 

El Coupeacabra

Diamond Teeth Samurai
Joined
Nov 22, 2016
Messages
3,673
Reputation
1,525
Daps
21,362
Reppin
214/254/512/210/281
no i don't think players watch HIGHLIGHT film

they watch actual game film... not only by themselves.. but with their entire team. then they have highly paid coaches and staff who watch it with them

while watching this tape. they slow it down, rewind it, stop and pause it, while pointing out things that were missed, telling people what they should have been doing, complementing those who performed their duties correctly

THEN they go out and practice the shyt for another 3-4 hours a day... then they play 82 games worth of it


on their off time, they also watch games just being a fan... then they retire and get jobs that require them to watch the shyt and analyze and do the same shyt their coach was doing to them


nikkas watching highlights and 50 games a season ain't really doing anything close to that




you telling me kobe and jordan, who was coached by one of the greatest players of all time... couldn't teach the coli a little something something about the game of basketball??? maybe they couldn't teach more than coach pop... but they damn sure gonna teach more than anyone in this forum unless we got some coaches in here that i don't know about
You ducked my question so let me ask you this...

Why didn't Kobe teach Shaq hoe to shoot free throws?

Why didn't Jordan make Rodman a killer midrange shooter?

Why haven't Steph and Klay and KD turned Draymond into the 4th sniper?

Because you have to be born with that talent level period. If its not there, its not there. You ever tried to explain the concept of paying bills to a 5 year old? You can't. Their minds can't comprehend the idea, its basically a foreign language to them.

That's what the talent disparity is like in the NBA. You cannot explain greatness. I'm sure Jordan could draw up a play for Kobe and he would be right there with him because they have the same mindset. Draw that same play up for Steve Nash and he won't get it. Not because he's not talented or smart but he doesn't have that approach to the game.

Obviously players watch film. But I asked exactly, do they watch their OWN HIGHLIGHT FILM for a reason. I bet you Jordan didn't sit around and marvel at his own post up footwork. Not to say he didn't study it, but he didn't sit and analyze it and break it down and try to understand it inside and out because HE DIDN'T NEED TO. He had it down pat, it was second nature.

To him its simply "Post up, fake the pass turn around, shoot." That's all he had to think about because god-given talent did the rest. He couldn't teach you to have a perfect fade away any more than Shaq could teach you how to be 7'1.
 
Top