Islam Is Wrong About Jesus

[Solomon Caine]

Atheism is cac shyt..

Either way we're both unworthy to enter heaven as we are so

I ain’t no atheist



and that dude that claims to be an ex Muslim (the host) he couldn’t even recite a verse that even 5 year olds can recite. He’s been exposed. He’s a punching bag for real religious scholars. But I guess people will listen to anyone as long as what they hear reaffirms their already confused beliefs.

 

[ℒℴѵℯJay ELECTUA]

debating about religion in 2022..

that's Sohh Sohh'ish era 2002!

 

[Tom Foolery]

We kind of been here already.
HOW ISLAM GOT JESUS COMPLETELY WRONG!

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

debating about religion in 2022.

That ain't what's happening. This is just textual criticism as far as I'm concerned.

Still, not ONE refutation of anything stated in the vid.

​

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

We kind of been here already.
HOW ISLAM GOT JESUS COMPLETELY WRONG!

That's about 'religious belief'. This is about 'textual criticism'.

Different topic.​

 

[ℒℴѵℯJay ELECTUA]

That ain't what's happening. This is just textual criticism as far as I'm concerned.

Still, not ONE refutation of anything stated in the vid.

​

Well it's not like any of these religion's are outwitting each other with real deal proof of the existence of god, life after death and return of the so called Messiah and False Messiah..

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

The Bible we read is not even the real one, imagine what the real one is?

It is the 'real' one.....two, actually.

No need to imagine. Just learn Koine Greek, Aramaic, and Hebrew.​

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Well it's not like any of these religion's are outwitting each other with real deal proof of the existence of god, life after death and return of the so called Messiah and False Messiah..

What accounted for 'proof' 2,000 years ago doesn't fly these days. What does fly is scholarly study of the text, just like any other ancient text.

I mean, think about it. What would that 'proof' consist of in this era???​

 

[ℒℴѵℯJay ELECTUA]

What accounted for 'proof' 2,000 years ago doesn't fly these days. What does fly is scholarly study of the text, just like any other ancient text.

I mean, think about it. What would that 'proof' consist of in this era???​

The proof of this Deity does exist! No concrete proof as of yet..
It's all hearsay and brave -blind following until you reach the end of Life.

It's a mystery yet hilarious that we still carry this fantasy attached to our livelihoods..i respect it until it gets savagely exhausting with wars, killings, attacks and ruining lives!

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

The proof of this Deity does exist! No concrete proof as of yet..
It's all hearsay and brave -blind following until you reach the end of Life.

It's a mystery yet hilarious that we still carry this fantasy attached to our livelihoods..i respect it until it gets savagely exhausting with wars, killings, attacks and ruining lives!

And this is why I'm a noncognitivist and stick to textual criticism.

Still strange there's not ONE refutation of what Ehrman stated.​

 

[Double Burger With Cheese]

What accounted for 'proof' 2,000 years ago doesn't fly these days. What does fly is scholarly study of the text, just like any other ancient text.

I mean, think about it. What would that 'proof' consist of in this era???​

Most people would probably take some sort of supernatural experience as proof. Like if God or the creator or Jesus or whatever one of them nikkas trying to pop out, but if one of them descended from the heavens or some shyt. It would have to be something extreme like that for most people to consider as proof. Just like people who have had individual supernatural experiences tend to have stronger faith in general. But all those experiences are unique to individuals and can be written off as just in your head or hallucinations. But a global collective super natural experience would be hard to argue.

At the end of the day my philosophy is, you’ll figure out what happen when you die when you die.

 

[GrindtooFilthy]

Notice, not ONE refutation to what was actually stated.

​

No one in the Coli is versed in Koran scriptures, we need a real imam here to make sense of this

 

[GrindtooFilthy]

The Bible we read is not even the real one, imagine what the real one is?

This also, the closets thing we have to the original Bible is the Ethiopian orthodox Bible which predates all other versions out there

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

No one in the Coli is versed in Koran scriptures, we need a real imam here to make sense of this

So, none of the cats in that other thread...

HOW ISLAM GOT JESUS COMPLETELY WRONG!

....are educated on the subject???​

 

[GrindtooFilthy]

So, none of the cats in that other thread...

HOW ISLAM GOT JESUS COMPLETELY WRONG!

....are educated on the subject???​

I dunno man I’ve heard real Koranic explanations and no one on this site has done it it Justice, half the things explained in Arabic I’m not even sure if there’s an English counter part too it