It is 2023. Why do you guys still want to financially provide for women?

[Wild self]

Depends on your dynamic with your wife. If you want her to be in her feminine nature, you have to assume this role. Or make more than her, while she works. But this is only for specific women, not all.

Now if you’re just in the “talking” stage that’s another story.

FIND yourself a Pick Me black woman and call it a life.

Don't try to cuff delusional feminists that negotiate on catering to you.

 

[Wild self]

So every relationship you've been in you never purchased anything for your girlfriend?

Not saying you gotta buy me a house but don't provide for me and see how that goes

You want a man to pay 100% of the bills while you stack?

 

[Wild self]

The job market is directly responsible for the out of wack dating dynamics. The average woman working in a white collar job now outearn men with the same level of education.

 

[Hitchens]

OP

This has to be the dumbest article nerdwallet posted and there's a few of them. It's both misleading and deceptive by using the notion a couple will have the same spending habits as a single person. Just another example how logic and critical thinking is going to shyt in this country.

The living expense data came from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

 

[Kiyoshi-Dono]

I don’t have many riches

 

[Traveler]

Your not investing in a woman. You are investing in your family.

 

[010101]

financially provide for your family

any woman outside your family is not your responsibility

duh..........

*

 

[CW_1991]

Is it just me or has the whole man/woman relationship dynamic been reduced into this kind of arithmetic equation?

At least as far as the discussions on it on the internet goes

 

[ItzRailT]

I sure as hell don't, never wanted too either, I can do good all by myself don't need no lazy dead weight anchoring me down.

 

[MarcMan]

Broke nikka babble.

Some of y'all sound like a couple guys I know. Cry about not being able to find a submissive woman but with nothing to bring to the table but platitudes and empty promises.

 

[blues_funk_reggae]

Why do you guys still want to financially provide for women?​

 

[MJ Truth]

This is a shytty analogy. Nowhere in my post did I advocate spending the money you save by not spending on someone and spend that money on something that is cheap and unnecessary. I said spend that money on something that is more lucrative.

Literally, what could POSSIBLY be a bigger investment than the person you marry and have kids with??

Just say you’re broke and can’t fathom it. It’s easy to argue against doing something that you don’t have the ability or option to do in the first place.

 

[Stir Fry]

I just find someone else

When was the last time you got laid? Are you in a position to raise a family rn?

 

[O.G.B]

Broke nikka babble.

Some of y'all sound like a couple guys I know. Cry about not being able to find a submissive woman but with nothing to bring to the table but platitudes and empty promises.

Dumb nikka drivel.

Some of y'all have to lead with financially providing for women off the top because many of these women you're canoodling with don't really find you attractive or like/respect you on a personal level unless you have something to offer monetarily.

That being stated, there's nothing wrong with providing/being the main provider for your wife/special women if she's worthy & dutiful in her womanhood.

 

[Ɀoᥱɣ]

Literally, what could POSSIBLY be a bigger investment than the person you marry and have kids with??

Just say you’re broke and can’t fathom it. It’s easy to argue against doing something that you don’t have the ability or option to do in the first place.

That's all it is, if he had he wouldn't be asking such a crazy question. If you're broke just say that lmao