"It is not a human right to destroy people's anuses" - Uganda MP; Uganda passes pro-Harlem bill

[Luke Cage]

neither russia or china believes what they're doing is right and thats why they do it through clandestine funding and front groups.

you don't need to post all this, because there is no logical argument you can make to justify being anti foreign government interference while making an exception for our own governments interference without total hypocrisy. it's impossible.


I already gave you the best solution. We can welcome them to our country ie political asylum. that's the only fair approach to disagreements with how foreign nations treat their own citizens or write their own laws.

 

[bnew]

you don't need to post all this, because there is no logical argument you can make to justify being anti foreign government interference while making an exception for our own governments interference without total hypocrisy. it's impossible.


I already gave you the best solution. We can welcome them to our country ie political asylum. that's the only fair approach to disagreements with how foreign nations treat their own citizens or write their own laws.

I never said I was anti-foreign government interference. I made a distinction between advocating for human rights laws and spreading propaganda for the purposes of destabilizing democracies. I see nothing wrong in governments petitioning one another to promote policies and laws that they can argue are beneficial to their citizens and respective countries.

 

[TEH]

Exactly. Just like us to grandstand over homosexuals to overcompensate and distract from real issues. People starving and can't find a job all over this country, but Ugandas greatesr executive priority is putting a stop to gay sex. The rest of the free world is just laughing at these pompous, backwards and failed religious societies like in Africa and the Middle east.

If African leaders could just get their heads out the fukking Bible, think for themselves for one moment, and take just half the energy they have in church and actually put it towards creating jobs and building a sustainable population and economy instead...maybe we'd be on our way to finally having a modern and respectable government we can call our own on the world stage. To compete, both economically and culturally with the rest of the world, including in the field of human rights. But of course, black folks would rather worry about making it to heaven, and being beside white Jesus of the British crown for eternity.

Just sick of us, always insisting on being archaic, ignorant people.


And just to disclaim no I'm not some hashtag, proud to be an American nikka, and I don't look down on Africans. This is an honest critique as a pan-African thinker.

Notice only you and a couple others are talking about God when God has nothing to do with the choices of man. Free will I remind you is a thing. Btw

Negged

 

[froggle]

Africa can't have a presence on the world stage. But we'll gladly take their resources.

ALL the countries who made this "world stage" got there by exploiting Africa. Even the great USA, the best economy in the world was built using stolen Africans

 

[Luke Cage]

I never said I was anti-foreign government interference. I made a distinction between advocating for human rights laws and spreading propaganda for the purposes of destabilizing democracies. I see nothing wrong in governments petitioning one another to promote policies and laws that they can argue to be beneficial to their citizens and countries.

In that case, you make a fair point. I just personally don't like to make distinctions like that, because ultimately morality is a social construct.
its not something that is inherent in nature.

so using it as justification for violation peoples sovereignty is a slippery slope. because whats to stop someone with their own set of morals from using the same justifications on us?

Our idea of human rights is just that, our own idea. We can invite people to partake in our ideas or we can be colonizers trying to force our ideas upon others without their consent. those are the only two options. personally i think the second option cancels out any moral justifications we made in the first place.

 

[TEH]

if uganda's spending their time passing legislation caping for white american evangelicals, surely they've taken care of all their other societal ills? maybe i'll finally visit kampala...

How U.S. Evangelicals Helped Homophobia Flourish in Africa

Anti-gay sentiment had previously existed on the continent, but white American religious groups have given it a boost.

foreignpolicy.com

jk why would i go to a shythole where two thirds of the people don't bathe or wash their hands, and their religious beliefs make them shyt in the streets?

As Uganda Strives To Be Open Defecation Free, Anti-Toilet Beliefs and Habits Persist

As Uganda fights open defecation, villages in the Karamoja region often recieve a bull to celebrate their status as open defecation free – but many revert to old habits as soon as the party’s over. Now, the government and NGOs are hoping a radio program and public shaming campaign will be enough...

globalpressjournal.com

He meant they shouldn’t be like the United States morally jackass. Lol at you bringing up clean drinking water when you knew what he meant.

 

[Drip Bayless]

It’s other factors at play here but Christianity has wreaked so much havoc on the African continent

 

[boriquaking]

If they're just being them in their own homes and private property, what's the issue? I know the fagbrehs over there are smart enough to keep it in the bedroom

People need people to punch down to.

 

[bnew]

In that case, you make a fair point. I just personally don't like to make distinctions like that, because ultimately morality is a social construct.
its not something that is inherent in nature.

so using it as justification for violation peoples sovereignty is a slippery slope. because whats to stop someone with their own set of morals from using the same justifications on us?

Our idea of human rights is just that, our own idea. We can invite people to partake in our ideas or we can be colonizers trying to force our ideas upon others without their consent. those are the only two options. personally i think the second option cancels out any moral justifications we made in the first place.

what exactly do you mean by "force"?

 

[bnew]

https://archive.is/L5Anx

 

[bnew]

Notice only you are talking about God when God has nothing to do with the choices of man. Free will I remind you is a thing. Btw

Negged

they literally justify the law with their religion quoting the book of genesis.

https://archive.is/4wZ2z

 

[TEH]

they literally justify the law with their religion quoting the book of genesis.

https://archive.is/4wZ2z

You’re missing the point. God didn’t make them do anything. The people in the USA read the same Bible.

Do you blame the Bible for slavery also … instead of greed for money and cacs?

 

[bnew]

heres the debate

https://archive.is/k8hOn

 

[mson]

they literally justify the law with their religion quoting the book of genesis.

https://archive.is/4wZ2z

The arguments are hilarious. Sounds like a mock parliamentary put on by third graders.

 

[T. Dubb Ya]

Good for Uganda!!!.. Keep that demonic lifestyle in check.